Economic impact of competition policy: A look beyond consumer surplus

Jan Svitak, Jarig van Sinderen

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

Abstract

Competition authorities try to mitigate negative distortionary effects on the markets by tackling abuse of market power or cartels and by controlling mergers. This study attempts to assess the impact of these endeavours by going beyond calculations of lumpsum effects on consumer surplus. We revise the simulation of Van Sinderen and Kemp (Economist 156(4):365-385, 2008) who use a cut in income taxes as a modelling device to simulate the impact of anti cartel policies. Our approach avoids attributing effects caused purely by changes in taxation to market power and uses changes in the Lerner index as the impuls. We have updated the model to enable simulating the impact of competition policies on productivity and R&D in order to get a balanced view on the effects. We find that the re-distribution of surplus from producers to consumers supported by ACM in this new setting is likely to have a positive effect on productivity, GDP, wages and consumption, and a small positive effect on employment. This differs from the outcome of Van Sinderen and Kemp, who did not find a positive impact on productivity, due to an overestimation of the employment growth.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)23-40
JournalDe Economist
Volume166
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Mar 2018
EventConference on the Impact assessment of Interventions of Competition and Consumer Authorities - Amsterdam, Netherlands
Duration: 1 Jan 2016 → …

Keywords

  • Antitrust
  • Competition law enforcement
  • Efficiency
  • Innovation
  • Welfare effects

Cite this

Svitak, Jan ; van Sinderen, Jarig. / Economic impact of competition policy : A look beyond consumer surplus. In: De Economist. 2018 ; Vol. 166, No. 1. pp. 23-40.
@article{821875033e4149eea9fbf7175a4e5eaa,
title = "Economic impact of competition policy: A look beyond consumer surplus",
abstract = "Competition authorities try to mitigate negative distortionary effects on the markets by tackling abuse of market power or cartels and by controlling mergers. This study attempts to assess the impact of these endeavours by going beyond calculations of lumpsum effects on consumer surplus. We revise the simulation of Van Sinderen and Kemp (Economist 156(4):365-385, 2008) who use a cut in income taxes as a modelling device to simulate the impact of anti cartel policies. Our approach avoids attributing effects caused purely by changes in taxation to market power and uses changes in the Lerner index as the impuls. We have updated the model to enable simulating the impact of competition policies on productivity and R&D in order to get a balanced view on the effects. We find that the re-distribution of surplus from producers to consumers supported by ACM in this new setting is likely to have a positive effect on productivity, GDP, wages and consumption, and a small positive effect on employment. This differs from the outcome of Van Sinderen and Kemp, who did not find a positive impact on productivity, due to an overestimation of the employment growth.",
keywords = "Antitrust, Competition law enforcement, Efficiency, Innovation, Welfare effects",
author = "Jan Svitak and {van Sinderen}, Jarig",
year = "2018",
month = "3",
doi = "10.1007/s10645-017-9312-9",
language = "English",
volume = "166",
pages = "23--40",
journal = "De Economist: Tijdschrift voor alle standen, tot bevordering van volkswelvaart, door verspreiding van eenvoudige beginselen van staatshuishoudkunde",
issn = "0013-063X",
publisher = "Springer",
number = "1",

}

Economic impact of competition policy : A look beyond consumer surplus. / Svitak, Jan; van Sinderen, Jarig.

In: De Economist, Vol. 166, No. 1, 03.2018, p. 23-40.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Economic impact of competition policy

T2 - A look beyond consumer surplus

AU - Svitak, Jan

AU - van Sinderen, Jarig

PY - 2018/3

Y1 - 2018/3

N2 - Competition authorities try to mitigate negative distortionary effects on the markets by tackling abuse of market power or cartels and by controlling mergers. This study attempts to assess the impact of these endeavours by going beyond calculations of lumpsum effects on consumer surplus. We revise the simulation of Van Sinderen and Kemp (Economist 156(4):365-385, 2008) who use a cut in income taxes as a modelling device to simulate the impact of anti cartel policies. Our approach avoids attributing effects caused purely by changes in taxation to market power and uses changes in the Lerner index as the impuls. We have updated the model to enable simulating the impact of competition policies on productivity and R&D in order to get a balanced view on the effects. We find that the re-distribution of surplus from producers to consumers supported by ACM in this new setting is likely to have a positive effect on productivity, GDP, wages and consumption, and a small positive effect on employment. This differs from the outcome of Van Sinderen and Kemp, who did not find a positive impact on productivity, due to an overestimation of the employment growth.

AB - Competition authorities try to mitigate negative distortionary effects on the markets by tackling abuse of market power or cartels and by controlling mergers. This study attempts to assess the impact of these endeavours by going beyond calculations of lumpsum effects on consumer surplus. We revise the simulation of Van Sinderen and Kemp (Economist 156(4):365-385, 2008) who use a cut in income taxes as a modelling device to simulate the impact of anti cartel policies. Our approach avoids attributing effects caused purely by changes in taxation to market power and uses changes in the Lerner index as the impuls. We have updated the model to enable simulating the impact of competition policies on productivity and R&D in order to get a balanced view on the effects. We find that the re-distribution of surplus from producers to consumers supported by ACM in this new setting is likely to have a positive effect on productivity, GDP, wages and consumption, and a small positive effect on employment. This differs from the outcome of Van Sinderen and Kemp, who did not find a positive impact on productivity, due to an overestimation of the employment growth.

KW - Antitrust

KW - Competition law enforcement

KW - Efficiency

KW - Innovation

KW - Welfare effects

U2 - 10.1007/s10645-017-9312-9

DO - 10.1007/s10645-017-9312-9

M3 - Article

VL - 166

SP - 23

EP - 40

JO - De Economist: Tijdschrift voor alle standen, tot bevordering van volkswelvaart, door verspreiding van eenvoudige beginselen van staatshuishoudkunde

JF - De Economist: Tijdschrift voor alle standen, tot bevordering van volkswelvaart, door verspreiding van eenvoudige beginselen van staatshuishoudkunde

SN - 0013-063X

IS - 1

ER -