Toezicht op de snijtafel: Grote verschillen van opvatting over de rol van de inspectie in po en vo

Translated title of the contribution: Education supervision under dispute: Large differences of opinion about the role of the Inspectorate in primary and secondary education

Paul Zoontjens

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

    Abstract

    Recent initiatives from Parliament to put restrictions to the role of the Inspectorate towards the schools are contradictory to those of government to increase it. What should set the right balance? Both initiatives ask for a critical approach on the basis of principles that are derived from the current understanding of freedom of education. The existence of a Inspectorate is necessary in our system, but its role should either be too restricted or to be too extensive. The essence of the solution of this problem should be the recognition that the Inspectorate has been created to preserve the basic level of quality education and not to go beyond.
    Translated title of the contributionEducation supervision under dispute: Large differences of opinion about the role of the Inspectorate in primary and secondary education
    Original languageDutch
    Pages (from-to)5-14
    Number of pages10
    JournalSchool en Wet
    Volume95
    Issue number4
    Publication statusPublished - Sep 2015

    Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Education supervision under dispute: Large differences of opinion about the role of the Inspectorate in primary and secondary education'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this