TY - JOUR
T1 - Effect of COVID-19 lockdown on maternity care and maternal outcome in the Netherlands
T2 - A national quasi-experimental study
AU - Gravesteijn, B.
AU - Boderie, N.W.
AU - van den Akker, T.
AU - Bertens, L.C.M.
AU - Bloemenkamp, K.
AU - Ochoa, L. Burgos
AU - Jonge, Ank De
AU - Kazemier, B.M.
AU - Klein, P.P.
AU - Kwint-Reijnders, I.
AU - Labrecque, J.A.
AU - Mol, B.W.
AU - Obermann-Borst, Sylvia
AU - Peters, Lilian L
AU - Ravelli, Anita
AU - Rosman, A.
AU - Been, Jasper
AU - de Groot, Christianne
AU - Ambrosino, E.
AU - Auweele, K.V.
AU - Been, J.
AU - Beijers, R.
AU - Bertens, L.
AU - Bloemenkamp, K.
AU - Boderie, N.
AU - Burdorf, L.
AU - Ochoa, L.B.
AU - de Jonge, A.
AU - de Weerth, C.
AU - Franx, A.
AU - Harper, S.
AU - Kazemier, B.M.
AU - Klein, P.P.
AU - Kretz, D.
AU - Labrecque, J.
AU - Mol, B.W.
AU - Muris, J.
AU - Nieuwenhuijze, M.
AU - Obermann, S.
AU - Oudijk, M.
AU - Peters, L.
AU - Ramerman, L.
AU - Ravelli, A.
AU - Schonewille-Rosman, A.
AU - Struijs, J.
AU - Torij, H.
AU - Beukering, M. Van
AU - van den Akker, T.
AU - van den Heuvel, M.
AU - van Dillen, J.
AU - van Lenthe, F.
AU - Verheij, R.
PY - 2024/10
Y1 - 2024/10
N2 - ObjectivesThe COVID-19 pandemic and associated lockdowns disrupted health care worldwide. High-income countries observed a decrease in preterm births during lockdowns, but maternal pregnancy–related outcomes were also likely affected. This study investigates the effect of the first COVID-19 lockdown (March–June 2020) on provision of maternity care and maternal pregnancy–related outcomes in the Netherlands.Study designNational quasi-experimental study.MethodsMultiple linked national registries were used, and all births from a gestational age of 24+0 weeks in 2010–2020 were included. In births starting in midwife-led primary care, we assessed the effect of lockdown on provision of care. In the general pregnant population, the impact on characteristics of labour and maternal morbidity was assessed. A difference-in-regression-discontinuity design was used to derive causal estimates for the year 2020.ResultsA total of 1,039,728 births were included. During the lockdown, births to women who started labour in midwife-led primary care (49%) more often ended at home (27% pre-lockdown, +10% [95% confidence interval: +7%, +13%]). A small decrease was seen in referrals towards obstetrician-led care during labour (46%, −3% [−5%,−0%]). In the overall group, no significant change was seen in induction of labour (27%, +1% [−1%, +3%]). We found no significant changes in the incidence of emergency caesarean section (9%, −1% [−2%, +0%]), obstetric anal sphincter injury (2%, +0% [−0%, +1%]), episiotomy (21%, −0% [−2%, +1%]), or post-partum haemorrhage: >1000 ml (6%, −0% [−1%, +1%]).ConclusionsDuring the first COVID-19 lockdown in the Netherlands, a substantial increase in homebirths was seen. There was no evidence for changed available maternal outcomes, suggesting that a maternity care system with a strong midwife-led primary care system may flexibly and safely adapt to external disruptions.
AB - ObjectivesThe COVID-19 pandemic and associated lockdowns disrupted health care worldwide. High-income countries observed a decrease in preterm births during lockdowns, but maternal pregnancy–related outcomes were also likely affected. This study investigates the effect of the first COVID-19 lockdown (March–June 2020) on provision of maternity care and maternal pregnancy–related outcomes in the Netherlands.Study designNational quasi-experimental study.MethodsMultiple linked national registries were used, and all births from a gestational age of 24+0 weeks in 2010–2020 were included. In births starting in midwife-led primary care, we assessed the effect of lockdown on provision of care. In the general pregnant population, the impact on characteristics of labour and maternal morbidity was assessed. A difference-in-regression-discontinuity design was used to derive causal estimates for the year 2020.ResultsA total of 1,039,728 births were included. During the lockdown, births to women who started labour in midwife-led primary care (49%) more often ended at home (27% pre-lockdown, +10% [95% confidence interval: +7%, +13%]). A small decrease was seen in referrals towards obstetrician-led care during labour (46%, −3% [−5%,−0%]). In the overall group, no significant change was seen in induction of labour (27%, +1% [−1%, +3%]). We found no significant changes in the incidence of emergency caesarean section (9%, −1% [−2%, +0%]), obstetric anal sphincter injury (2%, +0% [−0%, +1%]), episiotomy (21%, −0% [−2%, +1%]), or post-partum haemorrhage: >1000 ml (6%, −0% [−1%, +1%]).ConclusionsDuring the first COVID-19 lockdown in the Netherlands, a substantial increase in homebirths was seen. There was no evidence for changed available maternal outcomes, suggesting that a maternity care system with a strong midwife-led primary care system may flexibly and safely adapt to external disruptions.
KW - COVID-19
KW - Homebirth
KW - Maternal health
KW - Natural experiment
KW - SARS-CoV−2
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85199061463&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.puhe.2024.06.024
DO - 10.1016/j.puhe.2024.06.024
M3 - Article
SN - 0033-3506
VL - 235
SP - 15
EP - 25
JO - Public Health
JF - Public Health
ER -