Effect of COVID-19 lockdown on maternity care and maternal outcome in the Netherlands: A national quasi-experimental study

  • B. Gravesteijn*
  • , N.W. Boderie
  • , T. van den Akker
  • , L.C.M. Bertens
  • , K. Bloemenkamp
  • , L. Burgos Ochoa
  • , Ank De Jonge
  • , B.M. Kazemier
  • , P.P. Klein
  • , I. Kwint-Reijnders
  • , J.A. Labrecque
  • , B.W. Mol
  • , Sylvia Obermann-Borst
  • , Lilian L Peters
  • , Anita Ravelli
  • , A. Rosman
  • , Jasper Been
  • , Christianne de Groot
  • , E. Ambrosino
  • , K.V. Auweele
  • J. Been, R. Beijers, L. Bertens, K. Bloemenkamp, N. Boderie, L. Burdorf, L.B. Ochoa, A. de Jonge, C. de Weerth, A. Franx, S. Harper, B.M. Kazemier, P.P. Klein, D. Kretz, J. Labrecque, B.W. Mol, J. Muris, M. Nieuwenhuijze, S. Obermann, M. Oudijk, L. Peters, L. Ramerman, A. Ravelli, A. Schonewille-Rosman, J. Struijs, H. Torij, M. Van Beukering, T. van den Akker, M. van den Heuvel, J. van Dillen, F. van Lenthe, R. Verheij
*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

36 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Objectives
The COVID-19 pandemic and associated lockdowns disrupted health care worldwide. High-income countries observed a decrease in preterm births during lockdowns, but maternal pregnancy–related outcomes were also likely affected. This study investigates the effect of the first COVID-19 lockdown (March–June 2020) on provision of maternity care and maternal pregnancy–related outcomes in the Netherlands.

Study design
National quasi-experimental study.

Methods
Multiple linked national registries were used, and all births from a gestational age of 24+0 weeks in 2010–2020 were included. In births starting in midwife-led primary care, we assessed the effect of lockdown on provision of care. In the general pregnant population, the impact on characteristics of labour and maternal morbidity was assessed. A difference-in-regression-discontinuity design was used to derive causal estimates for the year 2020.

Results
A total of 1,039,728 births were included. During the lockdown, births to women who started labour in midwife-led primary care (49%) more often ended at home (27% pre-lockdown, +10% [95% confidence interval: +7%, +13%]). A small decrease was seen in referrals towards obstetrician-led care during labour (46%, −3% [−5%,−0%]). In the overall group, no significant change was seen in induction of labour (27%, +1% [−1%, +3%]). We found no significant changes in the incidence of emergency caesarean section (9%, −1% [−2%, +0%]), obstetric anal sphincter injury (2%, +0% [−0%, +1%]), episiotomy (21%, −0% [−2%, +1%]), or post-partum haemorrhage: >1000 ml (6%, −0% [−1%, +1%]).

Conclusions
During the first COVID-19 lockdown in the Netherlands, a substantial increase in homebirths was seen. There was no evidence for changed available maternal outcomes, suggesting that a maternity care system with a strong midwife-led primary care system may flexibly and safely adapt to external disruptions.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)15-25
Number of pages11
JournalPublic Health
Volume235
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Oct 2024

Keywords

  • COVID-19
  • Homebirth
  • Maternal health
  • Natural experiment
  • SARS-CoV−2

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Effect of COVID-19 lockdown on maternity care and maternal outcome in the Netherlands: A national quasi-experimental study'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this