TY - JOUR
T1 - Effectiveness of a multilevel intervention to improve mental health of hospital workers
T2 - The SEEGEN multicenter cluster randomized controlled trial
AU - Mulfinger, Nadine
AU - Jarczok, Marc N.
AU - Mueller, Andreas
AU - Genrich-Hasken, Melanie
AU - Worringer, Britta
AU - Kuellenberg, Janna Katharina
AU - Junne, Florian
AU - Rapp, Felicitas
AU - Rieger, Monika A.
AU - Rothermund-Nassir, Eva
AU - Ziegenhain, Ute
AU - Hander, Nicole R.
AU - Maatouk, Imad
AU - Helaß, Madeleine
AU - Peters, Martin
AU - Sander, Anja
AU - Krisam, Regina
AU - Limprecht, Ronald
AU - Gesang, Elena
AU - Ruhle, Sascha A.
AU - Süß, Stefan
AU - Puschner, Bernd
AU - Angerer, Peter
AU - Gündel, Harald
PY - 2025/8/21
Y1 - 2025/8/21
N2 - Introduction Hospital workers are at high risk for stress-related mental health issues and are considered a vulnerable workforce in most Western countries. Although multilevel interventions that address individual and organizational factors show promise, there is limited robust evidence of their effectiveness in hospital settings. This study evaluated the SEEGEN trial, a cluster-randomized controlled trial conducted in the German healthcare sector, to assess the effectiveness of a structured multilevel intervention designed to reduce psychosocial stress and to promote mental well-being among hospital employees. The intervention included five modules that targeted different hierarchical levels, sources of interpersonal and structural stress, and potentially vulnerable life stages. These modules were: (i) top management training, (ii) dilemma management - coping by taking responsibility, (iii) promoting stress-preventive relational leadership competence, (iv) reconciling work and family life, and (v) staying healthy at work.Methods The study was conducted at three clinical centers in Germany and included 18 clusters with a total of N = 415 participants. The clusters were randomly assigned to either an intervention or a wait-list control group. The primary outcome was psychological strain (Irritation Scale; IRR), and the secondary outcomes were mental well-being (WHO-5) and perceived psychosocial safety climate, (PSC-12). Intervention effects were estimated using a two-level linear analysis of covariance. Changes from baseline to the 11-month follow-up were analyzed.Results The intervention had no statistically significant effect on the primary or secondary outcomes.Conclusions The lack of significant effects may be attributed to low participation rates, an insufficient intervention dosage, and contextual factors, such as the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic and staffing shortages in the participating hospitals. Although the intervention cannot currently be recommended for widespread implementation, the study provides valuable insights into developing, delivering, and overcoming the challenges of multilevel workplace interventions in healthcare settings.
AB - Introduction Hospital workers are at high risk for stress-related mental health issues and are considered a vulnerable workforce in most Western countries. Although multilevel interventions that address individual and organizational factors show promise, there is limited robust evidence of their effectiveness in hospital settings. This study evaluated the SEEGEN trial, a cluster-randomized controlled trial conducted in the German healthcare sector, to assess the effectiveness of a structured multilevel intervention designed to reduce psychosocial stress and to promote mental well-being among hospital employees. The intervention included five modules that targeted different hierarchical levels, sources of interpersonal and structural stress, and potentially vulnerable life stages. These modules were: (i) top management training, (ii) dilemma management - coping by taking responsibility, (iii) promoting stress-preventive relational leadership competence, (iv) reconciling work and family life, and (v) staying healthy at work.Methods The study was conducted at three clinical centers in Germany and included 18 clusters with a total of N = 415 participants. The clusters were randomly assigned to either an intervention or a wait-list control group. The primary outcome was psychological strain (Irritation Scale; IRR), and the secondary outcomes were mental well-being (WHO-5) and perceived psychosocial safety climate, (PSC-12). Intervention effects were estimated using a two-level linear analysis of covariance. Changes from baseline to the 11-month follow-up were analyzed.Results The intervention had no statistically significant effect on the primary or secondary outcomes.Conclusions The lack of significant effects may be attributed to low participation rates, an insufficient intervention dosage, and contextual factors, such as the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic and staffing shortages in the participating hospitals. Although the intervention cannot currently be recommended for widespread implementation, the study provides valuable insights into developing, delivering, and overcoming the challenges of multilevel workplace interventions in healthcare settings.
KW - Psychosocial safety climate
KW - Leadership
KW - Workplace
KW - Burnout
UR - https://www.webofscience.com/api/gateway?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=wosstart_imp_pure20230417&SrcAuth=WosAPI&KeyUT=WOS:001555556700001&DestLinkType=FullRecord&DestApp=WOS_CPL
U2 - 10.1371/journal.pone.0330490
DO - 10.1371/journal.pone.0330490
M3 - Article
C2 - 40839616
SN - 1932-6203
VL - 20
JO - PLOS ONE
JF - PLOS ONE
IS - 8
M1 - e0330490
ER -