Effects of family cohesion and heart rate reactivity on aggressive/rule-breaking behavior and prosocial behavior in adolescence

The TRAILS Study

J.J. Sijtsema, E. Nederhof, R. Veenstra, J. Ormel, A.J. Oldehinkel, B.J. Ellis

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

Abstract

The biological sensitivity to context hypothesis posits that high physiological reactivity (i.e., increases in arousal from baseline) constitutes heightened sensitivity to environmental influences, for better or worse. To test this hypothesis, we examined the interactive effects of family cohesion and heart rate reactivity to a public speaking task on aggressive/rule-breaking and prosocial behavior in a large sample of adolescents (N = 679; M age = 16.14). Multivariate analyses revealed small- to medium-sized main effects of lower family cohesion and lower heart rate reactivity on higher levels of aggressive/rule-breaking and lower levels of prosocial behavior. Although there was some evidence of three-way interactions among family cohesion, heart rate reactivity, and sex in predicting these outcome variables, these interactions were not in the direction predicted by the biological sensitivity to context hypothesis. Instead, heightened reactivity appeared to operate as a protective factor against family adversity, rather than as a susceptibility factor. The results of the present study raise the possibility that stress reactivity may no longer operate as a mechanism of differential susceptibility in adolescence.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)699-712
JournalDevelopment and Psychopathology
Volume25
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2013

Fingerprint

Multivariate Analysis
Protective Factors

Cite this

@article{d8ea130f9e55472d82c69dd870dea9e2,
title = "Effects of family cohesion and heart rate reactivity on aggressive/rule-breaking behavior and prosocial behavior in adolescence: The TRAILS Study",
abstract = "The biological sensitivity to context hypothesis posits that high physiological reactivity (i.e., increases in arousal from baseline) constitutes heightened sensitivity to environmental influences, for better or worse. To test this hypothesis, we examined the interactive effects of family cohesion and heart rate reactivity to a public speaking task on aggressive/rule-breaking and prosocial behavior in a large sample of adolescents (N = 679; M age = 16.14). Multivariate analyses revealed small- to medium-sized main effects of lower family cohesion and lower heart rate reactivity on higher levels of aggressive/rule-breaking and lower levels of prosocial behavior. Although there was some evidence of three-way interactions among family cohesion, heart rate reactivity, and sex in predicting these outcome variables, these interactions were not in the direction predicted by the biological sensitivity to context hypothesis. Instead, heightened reactivity appeared to operate as a protective factor against family adversity, rather than as a susceptibility factor. The results of the present study raise the possibility that stress reactivity may no longer operate as a mechanism of differential susceptibility in adolescence.",
author = "J.J. Sijtsema and E. Nederhof and R. Veenstra and J. Ormel and A.J. Oldehinkel and B.J. Ellis",
year = "2013",
doi = "10.1017/S0954579413000114",
language = "English",
volume = "25",
pages = "699--712",
journal = "Development and Psychopathology",
issn = "0954-5794",
publisher = "CAMBRIDGE UNIV PRESS",
number = "3",

}

Effects of family cohesion and heart rate reactivity on aggressive/rule-breaking behavior and prosocial behavior in adolescence : The TRAILS Study. / Sijtsema, J.J.; Nederhof, E.; Veenstra, R.; Ormel, J.; Oldehinkel, A.J.; Ellis, B.J.

In: Development and Psychopathology, Vol. 25, No. 3, 2013, p. 699-712.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Effects of family cohesion and heart rate reactivity on aggressive/rule-breaking behavior and prosocial behavior in adolescence

T2 - The TRAILS Study

AU - Sijtsema, J.J.

AU - Nederhof, E.

AU - Veenstra, R.

AU - Ormel, J.

AU - Oldehinkel, A.J.

AU - Ellis, B.J.

PY - 2013

Y1 - 2013

N2 - The biological sensitivity to context hypothesis posits that high physiological reactivity (i.e., increases in arousal from baseline) constitutes heightened sensitivity to environmental influences, for better or worse. To test this hypothesis, we examined the interactive effects of family cohesion and heart rate reactivity to a public speaking task on aggressive/rule-breaking and prosocial behavior in a large sample of adolescents (N = 679; M age = 16.14). Multivariate analyses revealed small- to medium-sized main effects of lower family cohesion and lower heart rate reactivity on higher levels of aggressive/rule-breaking and lower levels of prosocial behavior. Although there was some evidence of three-way interactions among family cohesion, heart rate reactivity, and sex in predicting these outcome variables, these interactions were not in the direction predicted by the biological sensitivity to context hypothesis. Instead, heightened reactivity appeared to operate as a protective factor against family adversity, rather than as a susceptibility factor. The results of the present study raise the possibility that stress reactivity may no longer operate as a mechanism of differential susceptibility in adolescence.

AB - The biological sensitivity to context hypothesis posits that high physiological reactivity (i.e., increases in arousal from baseline) constitutes heightened sensitivity to environmental influences, for better or worse. To test this hypothesis, we examined the interactive effects of family cohesion and heart rate reactivity to a public speaking task on aggressive/rule-breaking and prosocial behavior in a large sample of adolescents (N = 679; M age = 16.14). Multivariate analyses revealed small- to medium-sized main effects of lower family cohesion and lower heart rate reactivity on higher levels of aggressive/rule-breaking and lower levels of prosocial behavior. Although there was some evidence of three-way interactions among family cohesion, heart rate reactivity, and sex in predicting these outcome variables, these interactions were not in the direction predicted by the biological sensitivity to context hypothesis. Instead, heightened reactivity appeared to operate as a protective factor against family adversity, rather than as a susceptibility factor. The results of the present study raise the possibility that stress reactivity may no longer operate as a mechanism of differential susceptibility in adolescence.

U2 - 10.1017/S0954579413000114

DO - 10.1017/S0954579413000114

M3 - Article

VL - 25

SP - 699

EP - 712

JO - Development and Psychopathology

JF - Development and Psychopathology

SN - 0954-5794

IS - 3

ER -