TY - JOUR
T1 - Efficiency of computerized clinical decision support systems involving anticoagulants
T2 - A flashmob study in Dutch hospital pharmacies
AU - Dutch CDSS‐efficiency study group
AU - Graafsma, Jetske
AU - van de Garde, Ewoudt M W
AU - Derijks, Hieronymus J
AU - Hoge, Rien H L
AU - Klopotowska, Joanna E
AU - Karapinar-Carkit, Fatma
AU - van den Bemt, Patricia M L A
N1 - © 2024 The Author(s). British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of British Pharmacological Society.
PY - 2025/1
Y1 - 2025/1
N2 - AIMS: Computerized decision support systems (CDSSs) aim to prevent adverse drug events. However, these systems generate an overload of alerts that are not always clinically relevant. Anticoagulants are frequently involved in these alerts. The aim of this study was to investigate the efficiency of CDSS alerts on anticoagulants in Dutch hospital pharmacies.METHODS: A multicentre, single-day, cross-sectional study was conducted using a flashmob design in Dutch hospital pharmacies, which have CDSSs that operate on both a national medication surveillance database and on self-developed clinical rules. Hospital pharmacists and pharmacy technicians collected data on the number and type of alerts and time needed for assessing these alerts. The primary outcome was the CDSS efficiency on anticoagulants, defined as the percentage of alerts on anticoagulants that led to an intervention. Secondary outcomes where among other CDSSs efficiency related to any medications and the time expenditure. Descriptive data-analysis was used.RESULTS: Of the 69 hospital pharmacies invited, 42 (61%) participated. The efficiency of CDSS alerts on anticoagulants was 4.0% (interquartile range [IQR] 14.0%) for the national medication surveillance database alerts and 14.3% (IQR 40.0%) for alerts from clinical rules. For any medication, the efficiency was lower: 1.8% (IQR 7.5%) and 13.4% (IQR 21.5%) respectively. The median time for assessing the relevance of all alerts was 2 (IQR 1:21) h/day for pharmacists and 6 (IQR 5:01) h/day for pharmacy technicians.CONCLUSION: CDSS efficiency is generally low, both for anticoagulants and any medication, while the time investment is high. Optimization of CDSSs is needed.
AB - AIMS: Computerized decision support systems (CDSSs) aim to prevent adverse drug events. However, these systems generate an overload of alerts that are not always clinically relevant. Anticoagulants are frequently involved in these alerts. The aim of this study was to investigate the efficiency of CDSS alerts on anticoagulants in Dutch hospital pharmacies.METHODS: A multicentre, single-day, cross-sectional study was conducted using a flashmob design in Dutch hospital pharmacies, which have CDSSs that operate on both a national medication surveillance database and on self-developed clinical rules. Hospital pharmacists and pharmacy technicians collected data on the number and type of alerts and time needed for assessing these alerts. The primary outcome was the CDSS efficiency on anticoagulants, defined as the percentage of alerts on anticoagulants that led to an intervention. Secondary outcomes where among other CDSSs efficiency related to any medications and the time expenditure. Descriptive data-analysis was used.RESULTS: Of the 69 hospital pharmacies invited, 42 (61%) participated. The efficiency of CDSS alerts on anticoagulants was 4.0% (interquartile range [IQR] 14.0%) for the national medication surveillance database alerts and 14.3% (IQR 40.0%) for alerts from clinical rules. For any medication, the efficiency was lower: 1.8% (IQR 7.5%) and 13.4% (IQR 21.5%) respectively. The median time for assessing the relevance of all alerts was 2 (IQR 1:21) h/day for pharmacists and 6 (IQR 5:01) h/day for pharmacy technicians.CONCLUSION: CDSS efficiency is generally low, both for anticoagulants and any medication, while the time investment is high. Optimization of CDSSs is needed.
KW - Humans
KW - Anticoagulants/adverse effects
KW - Decision Support Systems, Clinical
KW - Netherlands
KW - Cross-Sectional Studies
KW - Pharmacy Service, Hospital/organization & administration
KW - Pharmacists/organization & administration
KW - Medical Order Entry Systems/standards
KW - Pharmacy Technicians/organization & administration
U2 - 10.1111/bcp.16236
DO - 10.1111/bcp.16236
M3 - Article
C2 - 39256034
SN - 0306-5251
VL - 91
SP - 157
EP - 165
JO - British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology
JF - British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology
IS - 1
ER -