Electrophysiological correlates of complement coercion

Gina R Kuperberg, Arim Choi, Neil Cohn, Martin Paczynski, Ray Jackendoff

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

Abstract

This study examined the electrophysiological correlates of complement coercion. ERPs were measured as participants read and made acceptability judgments about plausible coerced sentences, plausible noncoerced sentences, and highly implausible animacy-violated sentences ("The journalist began/wrote/astonished the article before his coffee break"). Relative to noncoerced complement nouns, the coerced nouns evoked an N400 effect. This effect was not modulated by the number of possible activities implied by the coerced nouns (e.g., began reading the article; began writing the article) and did not differ either in magnitude or scalp distribution from the N400 effect evoked by the animacy-violated complement nouns. We suggest that the N400 modulation to both coerced and animacy-violated complement nouns reflected different types of mismatches between the semantic restrictions of the verb and the semantic properties of the incoming complement noun. This is consistent with models holding that a verb's semantic argument structure is represented and stored at a distinct level from its syntactic argument structure. Unlike the coerced complement noun, the animacy-violated nouns also evoked a robust P600 effect, which may have been triggered by the judgments of the highly implausible (syntactically determined) meanings of the animacy-violated propositions. No additional ERP effects were seen in the coerced sentences until the sentence-final word that, relative to sentence-final words in the noncoerced sentences, evoked a sustained anteriorly distributed positivity. We suggest that this effect reflected delayed attempts to retrieve the specific event(s) implied by coerced complement nouns.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)2685-701
Number of pages17
JournalJournal of Cognitive Neuroscience
Volume22
Issue number12
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Dec 2010
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Coercion
Coffee

Keywords

  • Adolescent
  • Analysis of Variance
  • Brain Mapping
  • Cerebral Cortex
  • Comprehension
  • Electroencephalography
  • Evoked Potentials
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Judgment
  • Language
  • Male
  • Reaction Time
  • Young Adult

Cite this

Kuperberg, Gina R ; Choi, Arim ; Cohn, Neil ; Paczynski, Martin ; Jackendoff, Ray. / Electrophysiological correlates of complement coercion. In: Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience. 2010 ; Vol. 22, No. 12. pp. 2685-701.
@article{d49f747becdc425bb283c1744f82b729,
title = "Electrophysiological correlates of complement coercion",
abstract = "This study examined the electrophysiological correlates of complement coercion. ERPs were measured as participants read and made acceptability judgments about plausible coerced sentences, plausible noncoerced sentences, and highly implausible animacy-violated sentences ({"}The journalist began/wrote/astonished the article before his coffee break{"}). Relative to noncoerced complement nouns, the coerced nouns evoked an N400 effect. This effect was not modulated by the number of possible activities implied by the coerced nouns (e.g., began reading the article; began writing the article) and did not differ either in magnitude or scalp distribution from the N400 effect evoked by the animacy-violated complement nouns. We suggest that the N400 modulation to both coerced and animacy-violated complement nouns reflected different types of mismatches between the semantic restrictions of the verb and the semantic properties of the incoming complement noun. This is consistent with models holding that a verb's semantic argument structure is represented and stored at a distinct level from its syntactic argument structure. Unlike the coerced complement noun, the animacy-violated nouns also evoked a robust P600 effect, which may have been triggered by the judgments of the highly implausible (syntactically determined) meanings of the animacy-violated propositions. No additional ERP effects were seen in the coerced sentences until the sentence-final word that, relative to sentence-final words in the noncoerced sentences, evoked a sustained anteriorly distributed positivity. We suggest that this effect reflected delayed attempts to retrieve the specific event(s) implied by coerced complement nouns.",
keywords = "Adolescent, Analysis of Variance, Brain Mapping, Cerebral Cortex, Comprehension, Electroencephalography, Evoked Potentials, Female, Humans, Judgment, Language, Male, Reaction Time, Young Adult",
author = "Kuperberg, {Gina R} and Arim Choi and Neil Cohn and Martin Paczynski and Ray Jackendoff",
year = "2010",
month = "12",
doi = "10.1162/jocn.2009.21333",
language = "English",
volume = "22",
pages = "2685--701",
journal = "Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience",
issn = "0898-929X",
publisher = "MIT Press",
number = "12",

}

Kuperberg, GR, Choi, A, Cohn, N, Paczynski, M & Jackendoff, R 2010, 'Electrophysiological correlates of complement coercion', Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, vol. 22, no. 12, pp. 2685-701. https://doi.org/10.1162/jocn.2009.21333

Electrophysiological correlates of complement coercion. / Kuperberg, Gina R; Choi, Arim; Cohn, Neil; Paczynski, Martin; Jackendoff, Ray.

In: Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, Vol. 22, No. 12, 12.2010, p. 2685-701.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Electrophysiological correlates of complement coercion

AU - Kuperberg, Gina R

AU - Choi, Arim

AU - Cohn, Neil

AU - Paczynski, Martin

AU - Jackendoff, Ray

PY - 2010/12

Y1 - 2010/12

N2 - This study examined the electrophysiological correlates of complement coercion. ERPs were measured as participants read and made acceptability judgments about plausible coerced sentences, plausible noncoerced sentences, and highly implausible animacy-violated sentences ("The journalist began/wrote/astonished the article before his coffee break"). Relative to noncoerced complement nouns, the coerced nouns evoked an N400 effect. This effect was not modulated by the number of possible activities implied by the coerced nouns (e.g., began reading the article; began writing the article) and did not differ either in magnitude or scalp distribution from the N400 effect evoked by the animacy-violated complement nouns. We suggest that the N400 modulation to both coerced and animacy-violated complement nouns reflected different types of mismatches between the semantic restrictions of the verb and the semantic properties of the incoming complement noun. This is consistent with models holding that a verb's semantic argument structure is represented and stored at a distinct level from its syntactic argument structure. Unlike the coerced complement noun, the animacy-violated nouns also evoked a robust P600 effect, which may have been triggered by the judgments of the highly implausible (syntactically determined) meanings of the animacy-violated propositions. No additional ERP effects were seen in the coerced sentences until the sentence-final word that, relative to sentence-final words in the noncoerced sentences, evoked a sustained anteriorly distributed positivity. We suggest that this effect reflected delayed attempts to retrieve the specific event(s) implied by coerced complement nouns.

AB - This study examined the electrophysiological correlates of complement coercion. ERPs were measured as participants read and made acceptability judgments about plausible coerced sentences, plausible noncoerced sentences, and highly implausible animacy-violated sentences ("The journalist began/wrote/astonished the article before his coffee break"). Relative to noncoerced complement nouns, the coerced nouns evoked an N400 effect. This effect was not modulated by the number of possible activities implied by the coerced nouns (e.g., began reading the article; began writing the article) and did not differ either in magnitude or scalp distribution from the N400 effect evoked by the animacy-violated complement nouns. We suggest that the N400 modulation to both coerced and animacy-violated complement nouns reflected different types of mismatches between the semantic restrictions of the verb and the semantic properties of the incoming complement noun. This is consistent with models holding that a verb's semantic argument structure is represented and stored at a distinct level from its syntactic argument structure. Unlike the coerced complement noun, the animacy-violated nouns also evoked a robust P600 effect, which may have been triggered by the judgments of the highly implausible (syntactically determined) meanings of the animacy-violated propositions. No additional ERP effects were seen in the coerced sentences until the sentence-final word that, relative to sentence-final words in the noncoerced sentences, evoked a sustained anteriorly distributed positivity. We suggest that this effect reflected delayed attempts to retrieve the specific event(s) implied by coerced complement nouns.

KW - Adolescent

KW - Analysis of Variance

KW - Brain Mapping

KW - Cerebral Cortex

KW - Comprehension

KW - Electroencephalography

KW - Evoked Potentials

KW - Female

KW - Humans

KW - Judgment

KW - Language

KW - Male

KW - Reaction Time

KW - Young Adult

U2 - 10.1162/jocn.2009.21333

DO - 10.1162/jocn.2009.21333

M3 - Article

VL - 22

SP - 2685

EP - 2701

JO - Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience

JF - Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience

SN - 0898-929X

IS - 12

ER -