Embodied relations are encoded in language

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

Abstract

Studies of embodied cognition have shown that comprehenders process iconic word pairs (attic-basement) more quickly than reverse-iconic pairs (basement-attic) when the pairs are presented to them in a vertical spatial arrangement. This effect disappears in a horizontal spatial arrangement. This has been claimed to show that comprehenders perceptually simulate these word pairs. A complementary explanation is that linguistic conceptualizations (word order) reflect prelinguistic conceptualizations (spatial iconicity), whereby comprehenders use these linguistic conceptualizations in the comprehension process. The results of corpus linguistic, rating, and semantic judgment studies reported here supported this explanation: Iconic word pairs were more frequent than reverse-iconic word pairs; frequency of word order explained response times in a semantic judgment task better than iconicity did; and when iconic word pairs were presented in a horizontal arrangement, the iconicity effect disappeared, but the word order effect remained. These findings show that spatial iconicity patterns are reflected in word order patterns and that comprehenders are sensitive to these word order patterns in language-processing tasks.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)838-844
Number of pages7
JournalPsychonomic Bulletin & Review
Volume15
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Aug 2008
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Linguistics
Language
Iconic
Iconicity

Keywords

  • Comprehension
  • Humans
  • Judgment
  • Mental Recall
  • Orientation
  • Paired-Associate Learning
  • Reaction Time
  • Semantics
  • Set (Psychology)

Cite this

@article{436c03582dee44c2ac342e7e91077c3b,
title = "Embodied relations are encoded in language",
abstract = "Studies of embodied cognition have shown that comprehenders process iconic word pairs (attic-basement) more quickly than reverse-iconic pairs (basement-attic) when the pairs are presented to them in a vertical spatial arrangement. This effect disappears in a horizontal spatial arrangement. This has been claimed to show that comprehenders perceptually simulate these word pairs. A complementary explanation is that linguistic conceptualizations (word order) reflect prelinguistic conceptualizations (spatial iconicity), whereby comprehenders use these linguistic conceptualizations in the comprehension process. The results of corpus linguistic, rating, and semantic judgment studies reported here supported this explanation: Iconic word pairs were more frequent than reverse-iconic word pairs; frequency of word order explained response times in a semantic judgment task better than iconicity did; and when iconic word pairs were presented in a horizontal arrangement, the iconicity effect disappeared, but the word order effect remained. These findings show that spatial iconicity patterns are reflected in word order patterns and that comprehenders are sensitive to these word order patterns in language-processing tasks.",
keywords = "Comprehension, Humans, Judgment, Mental Recall, Orientation, Paired-Associate Learning, Reaction Time, Semantics, Set (Psychology)",
author = "Louwerse, {Max M}",
year = "2008",
month = "8",
doi = "10.3758/PBR.15.4.838",
language = "English",
volume = "15",
pages = "838--844",
journal = "Psychonomic Bulletin & Review",
issn = "1069-9384",
publisher = "Springer",
number = "4",

}

Embodied relations are encoded in language. / Louwerse, Max M.

In: Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, Vol. 15, No. 4, 08.2008, p. 838-844.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Embodied relations are encoded in language

AU - Louwerse, Max M

PY - 2008/8

Y1 - 2008/8

N2 - Studies of embodied cognition have shown that comprehenders process iconic word pairs (attic-basement) more quickly than reverse-iconic pairs (basement-attic) when the pairs are presented to them in a vertical spatial arrangement. This effect disappears in a horizontal spatial arrangement. This has been claimed to show that comprehenders perceptually simulate these word pairs. A complementary explanation is that linguistic conceptualizations (word order) reflect prelinguistic conceptualizations (spatial iconicity), whereby comprehenders use these linguistic conceptualizations in the comprehension process. The results of corpus linguistic, rating, and semantic judgment studies reported here supported this explanation: Iconic word pairs were more frequent than reverse-iconic word pairs; frequency of word order explained response times in a semantic judgment task better than iconicity did; and when iconic word pairs were presented in a horizontal arrangement, the iconicity effect disappeared, but the word order effect remained. These findings show that spatial iconicity patterns are reflected in word order patterns and that comprehenders are sensitive to these word order patterns in language-processing tasks.

AB - Studies of embodied cognition have shown that comprehenders process iconic word pairs (attic-basement) more quickly than reverse-iconic pairs (basement-attic) when the pairs are presented to them in a vertical spatial arrangement. This effect disappears in a horizontal spatial arrangement. This has been claimed to show that comprehenders perceptually simulate these word pairs. A complementary explanation is that linguistic conceptualizations (word order) reflect prelinguistic conceptualizations (spatial iconicity), whereby comprehenders use these linguistic conceptualizations in the comprehension process. The results of corpus linguistic, rating, and semantic judgment studies reported here supported this explanation: Iconic word pairs were more frequent than reverse-iconic word pairs; frequency of word order explained response times in a semantic judgment task better than iconicity did; and when iconic word pairs were presented in a horizontal arrangement, the iconicity effect disappeared, but the word order effect remained. These findings show that spatial iconicity patterns are reflected in word order patterns and that comprehenders are sensitive to these word order patterns in language-processing tasks.

KW - Comprehension

KW - Humans

KW - Judgment

KW - Mental Recall

KW - Orientation

KW - Paired-Associate Learning

KW - Reaction Time

KW - Semantics

KW - Set (Psychology)

U2 - 10.3758/PBR.15.4.838

DO - 10.3758/PBR.15.4.838

M3 - Article

C2 - 18792513

VL - 15

SP - 838

EP - 844

JO - Psychonomic Bulletin & Review

JF - Psychonomic Bulletin & Review

SN - 1069-9384

IS - 4

ER -