Emotion regulation mediates relationships between mindfulness facets and aggression dimensions

Carlo Garofalo, Steven Gillespie, Patrizia Velotti

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

Abstract

Recent years have witnessed an increase of research on socio‐affective factors that can explain individual differences in aggressive tendencies across community and offender populations. Specifically, mindfulness and emotion regulation have emerged as important factors, which could also constitute important prevention and treatment targets. Yet, recent studies have advanced the possibility that mindfulness may also have a “dark” side, being associated with increased levels of aggression‐related variables, especially when accounting for the variance associated with emotion regulation. The present study sought to elucidate relationships among mindfulness, emotion regulation, and aggression dimensions (i.e., verbal and physical aggression, anger, and hostility) across violent offender (N = 397) and community (N = 324) samples. Results revealed expected associations between both mindfulness and emotion regulation and aggression dimensions, such that greater impairments in mindfulness and emotion regulation were related to increased levels of aggression across samples. Further, analyses of indirect effects revealed that a latent emotion dysregulation factor accounted for (i.e., mediated) relationships between mindfulness facets and aggression dimensions in both samples. Previously reported positive associations between the residual variance in mindfulness scales (i.e., controlling for emotion regulation) and aggression‐related variables were not replicated in the current samples. Taken together, findings suggest that mindfulness and emotion regulation have unequivocal relations with lower levels of aggression, and should therefore be considered as relevant targets for prevention and treatment programs aimed at reducing aggressive tendencies.
Original languageEnglish
JournalAggressive Behavior
DOIs
Publication statusE-pub ahead of print - 2019

Fingerprint

Hostility
Mindfulness
Aggression
Emotion Regulation
Individuality
Offenders
Anger
Impairment
Emotion
Individual Differences
Physical Aggression
Verbal Aggression

Keywords

  • ALEXITHYMIA
  • BEHAVIOR
  • DIFFICULTIES
  • DYSREGULATION
  • IMPULSIVITY
  • NEUROSCIENCE
  • QUESTIONNAIRE
  • SELF-REGULATION
  • VALIDITY
  • VIOLENT
  • anger
  • emotion dysregulation
  • hostility
  • mindfulness
  • violence

Cite this

@article{98f467386a5448b59e282b60cfa133a8,
title = "Emotion regulation mediates relationships between mindfulness facets and aggression dimensions",
abstract = "Recent years have witnessed an increase of research on socio‐affective factors that can explain individual differences in aggressive tendencies across community and offender populations. Specifically, mindfulness and emotion regulation have emerged as important factors, which could also constitute important prevention and treatment targets. Yet, recent studies have advanced the possibility that mindfulness may also have a “dark” side, being associated with increased levels of aggression‐related variables, especially when accounting for the variance associated with emotion regulation. The present study sought to elucidate relationships among mindfulness, emotion regulation, and aggression dimensions (i.e., verbal and physical aggression, anger, and hostility) across violent offender (N = 397) and community (N = 324) samples. Results revealed expected associations between both mindfulness and emotion regulation and aggression dimensions, such that greater impairments in mindfulness and emotion regulation were related to increased levels of aggression across samples. Further, analyses of indirect effects revealed that a latent emotion dysregulation factor accounted for (i.e., mediated) relationships between mindfulness facets and aggression dimensions in both samples. Previously reported positive associations between the residual variance in mindfulness scales (i.e., controlling for emotion regulation) and aggression‐related variables were not replicated in the current samples. Taken together, findings suggest that mindfulness and emotion regulation have unequivocal relations with lower levels of aggression, and should therefore be considered as relevant targets for prevention and treatment programs aimed at reducing aggressive tendencies.",
keywords = "ALEXITHYMIA, BEHAVIOR, DIFFICULTIES, DYSREGULATION, IMPULSIVITY, NEUROSCIENCE, QUESTIONNAIRE, SELF-REGULATION, VALIDITY, VIOLENT, anger, emotion dysregulation, hostility, mindfulness, violence",
author = "Carlo Garofalo and Steven Gillespie and Patrizia Velotti",
year = "2019",
doi = "10.1002/ab.21868",
language = "English",
journal = "Aggressive Behavior",
issn = "0096-140X",
publisher = "Wiley-Liss Inc.",

}

Emotion regulation mediates relationships between mindfulness facets and aggression dimensions. / Garofalo, Carlo; Gillespie, Steven; Velotti, Patrizia.

In: Aggressive Behavior, 2019.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Emotion regulation mediates relationships between mindfulness facets and aggression dimensions

AU - Garofalo, Carlo

AU - Gillespie, Steven

AU - Velotti, Patrizia

PY - 2019

Y1 - 2019

N2 - Recent years have witnessed an increase of research on socio‐affective factors that can explain individual differences in aggressive tendencies across community and offender populations. Specifically, mindfulness and emotion regulation have emerged as important factors, which could also constitute important prevention and treatment targets. Yet, recent studies have advanced the possibility that mindfulness may also have a “dark” side, being associated with increased levels of aggression‐related variables, especially when accounting for the variance associated with emotion regulation. The present study sought to elucidate relationships among mindfulness, emotion regulation, and aggression dimensions (i.e., verbal and physical aggression, anger, and hostility) across violent offender (N = 397) and community (N = 324) samples. Results revealed expected associations between both mindfulness and emotion regulation and aggression dimensions, such that greater impairments in mindfulness and emotion regulation were related to increased levels of aggression across samples. Further, analyses of indirect effects revealed that a latent emotion dysregulation factor accounted for (i.e., mediated) relationships between mindfulness facets and aggression dimensions in both samples. Previously reported positive associations between the residual variance in mindfulness scales (i.e., controlling for emotion regulation) and aggression‐related variables were not replicated in the current samples. Taken together, findings suggest that mindfulness and emotion regulation have unequivocal relations with lower levels of aggression, and should therefore be considered as relevant targets for prevention and treatment programs aimed at reducing aggressive tendencies.

AB - Recent years have witnessed an increase of research on socio‐affective factors that can explain individual differences in aggressive tendencies across community and offender populations. Specifically, mindfulness and emotion regulation have emerged as important factors, which could also constitute important prevention and treatment targets. Yet, recent studies have advanced the possibility that mindfulness may also have a “dark” side, being associated with increased levels of aggression‐related variables, especially when accounting for the variance associated with emotion regulation. The present study sought to elucidate relationships among mindfulness, emotion regulation, and aggression dimensions (i.e., verbal and physical aggression, anger, and hostility) across violent offender (N = 397) and community (N = 324) samples. Results revealed expected associations between both mindfulness and emotion regulation and aggression dimensions, such that greater impairments in mindfulness and emotion regulation were related to increased levels of aggression across samples. Further, analyses of indirect effects revealed that a latent emotion dysregulation factor accounted for (i.e., mediated) relationships between mindfulness facets and aggression dimensions in both samples. Previously reported positive associations between the residual variance in mindfulness scales (i.e., controlling for emotion regulation) and aggression‐related variables were not replicated in the current samples. Taken together, findings suggest that mindfulness and emotion regulation have unequivocal relations with lower levels of aggression, and should therefore be considered as relevant targets for prevention and treatment programs aimed at reducing aggressive tendencies.

KW - ALEXITHYMIA

KW - BEHAVIOR

KW - DIFFICULTIES

KW - DYSREGULATION

KW - IMPULSIVITY

KW - NEUROSCIENCE

KW - QUESTIONNAIRE

KW - SELF-REGULATION

KW - VALIDITY

KW - VIOLENT

KW - anger

KW - emotion dysregulation

KW - hostility

KW - mindfulness

KW - violence

U2 - 10.1002/ab.21868

DO - 10.1002/ab.21868

M3 - Article

JO - Aggressive Behavior

JF - Aggressive Behavior

SN - 0096-140X

ER -