Emotional and non-emotional memories are suppressible under direct suppression instructions

Kevin van Schie*, Elke Geraerts, Michael C. Anderson

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

31 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Research on retrieval suppression has produced varying results concerning whether negatively valenced memories are more or less suppressible than neutral memories. This variability may arise if, across studies, participants adopt different approaches to memory control. Cognitive and neurobiological research points to two mechanisms that achieve retrieval suppression: thought-substitution and direct suppression (Benoit & Anderson, 2012; Bergström, de Fockert, & Richardson-Klavehn, 2009). Using the Think/No-think paradigm, this study examined whether participants can inhibit neutral and negatively valenced memories, using a uniform direct suppression strategy. Importantly, when strategy was controlled, negative and neutral items were comparably inhibited. Participants reported high compliance with direct suppression instructions, and success at controlling awareness predicted forgetting. These findings provide the first evidence that direct suppression can impair negatively valenced events, and suggest that variability in forgetting negative memories in prior studies is unlikely to arise from difficulty using direct suppression to control emotionally negative experiences.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1122-1131
JournalCognition and Emotion
Volume27
Issue number6
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2013
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Direct suppression
  • Memory control
  • Think/No-think paradigm

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Emotional and non-emotional memories are suppressible under direct suppression instructions'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this