Empirical Evidence on Repeated Sequential Games

Riccardo Ghidoni, Sigrid Suetens

Research output: Working paper › Discussion paper › Other research output

43 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Sequentiality of moves in an infinitely repeated prisoner’s dilemma does not change the conditions under which mutual cooperation can be supported in equilibrium as compared to simultaneous decision-making. The nature of the interaction is different, however, given that the second mover in a sequential-move game does not face strategic uncertainty in the stage game. We study in an experiment whether sequentiality has an effect on cooperation rates. We find that with intermediate incentives to cooperate, sequentiality increases cooperation rates by around 40 percentage points after learning, whereas with very low or high incentives to cooperate, cooperation rates are respectively very low or high in both settings.
Original languageEnglish
Place of PublicationTilburg
PublisherCentER, Center for Economic Research
Number of pages61
Volume2019-016
Publication statusPublished - 8 May 2019

Publication series

NameCentER Discussion Paper
Volume2019-016

Fingerprint

Empirical evidence
Sequential game
Incentives
Strategic uncertainty
Experiment
Decision making
Repeated prisoner's dilemma
Interaction

Keywords

  • cooperation
  • infinitely repeated games
  • sequential prisoner's dilemma
  • strategic uncertainty
  • experiment

Cite this

Ghidoni, R., & Suetens, S. (2019). Empirical Evidence on Repeated Sequential Games. (CentER Discussion Paper; Vol. 2019-016). Tilburg: CentER, Center for Economic Research.
Ghidoni, Riccardo ; Suetens, Sigrid. / Empirical Evidence on Repeated Sequential Games. Tilburg : CentER, Center for Economic Research, 2019. (CentER Discussion Paper).
@techreport{ff3a441fe1964e45ba59c86864a966fc,
title = "Empirical Evidence on Repeated Sequential Games",
abstract = "Sequentiality of moves in an infinitely repeated prisoner’s dilemma does not change the conditions under which mutual cooperation can be supported in equilibrium as compared to simultaneous decision-making. The nature of the interaction is different, however, given that the second mover in a sequential-move game does not face strategic uncertainty in the stage game. We study in an experiment whether sequentiality has an effect on cooperation rates. We find that with intermediate incentives to cooperate, sequentiality increases cooperation rates by around 40 percentage points after learning, whereas with very low or high incentives to cooperate, cooperation rates are respectively very low or high in both settings.",
keywords = "cooperation, infinitely repeated games, sequential prisoner's dilemma, strategic uncertainty, experiment",
author = "Riccardo Ghidoni and Sigrid Suetens",
note = "CentER Discussion Paper Nr. 2019-016",
year = "2019",
month = "5",
day = "8",
language = "English",
volume = "2019-016",
series = "CentER Discussion Paper",
publisher = "CentER, Center for Economic Research",
type = "WorkingPaper",
institution = "CentER, Center for Economic Research",

}

Ghidoni, R & Suetens, S 2019 'Empirical Evidence on Repeated Sequential Games' CentER Discussion Paper, vol. 2019-016, CentER, Center for Economic Research, Tilburg.

Empirical Evidence on Repeated Sequential Games. / Ghidoni, Riccardo; Suetens, Sigrid.

Tilburg : CentER, Center for Economic Research, 2019. (CentER Discussion Paper; Vol. 2019-016).

Research output: Working paper › Discussion paper › Other research output

TY - UNPB

T1 - Empirical Evidence on Repeated Sequential Games

AU - Ghidoni, Riccardo

AU - Suetens, Sigrid

N1 - CentER Discussion Paper Nr. 2019-016

PY - 2019/5/8

Y1 - 2019/5/8

N2 - Sequentiality of moves in an infinitely repeated prisoner’s dilemma does not change the conditions under which mutual cooperation can be supported in equilibrium as compared to simultaneous decision-making. The nature of the interaction is different, however, given that the second mover in a sequential-move game does not face strategic uncertainty in the stage game. We study in an experiment whether sequentiality has an effect on cooperation rates. We find that with intermediate incentives to cooperate, sequentiality increases cooperation rates by around 40 percentage points after learning, whereas with very low or high incentives to cooperate, cooperation rates are respectively very low or high in both settings.

AB - Sequentiality of moves in an infinitely repeated prisoner’s dilemma does not change the conditions under which mutual cooperation can be supported in equilibrium as compared to simultaneous decision-making. The nature of the interaction is different, however, given that the second mover in a sequential-move game does not face strategic uncertainty in the stage game. We study in an experiment whether sequentiality has an effect on cooperation rates. We find that with intermediate incentives to cooperate, sequentiality increases cooperation rates by around 40 percentage points after learning, whereas with very low or high incentives to cooperate, cooperation rates are respectively very low or high in both settings.

KW - cooperation

KW - infinitely repeated games

KW - sequential prisoner's dilemma

KW - strategic uncertainty

KW - experiment

M3 - Discussion paper

VL - 2019-016

T3 - CentER Discussion Paper

BT - Empirical Evidence on Repeated Sequential Games

PB - CentER, Center for Economic Research

CY - Tilburg

ER -

Ghidoni R, Suetens S. Empirical Evidence on Repeated Sequential Games. Tilburg: CentER, Center for Economic Research. 2019 May 8. (CentER Discussion Paper).

Access to Document