Empirical Tests of Optimal Cognitive Distance

S.H.K. Wuyts, M. Colombo, S. Dutta, B. Nooteboom

Research output: Working paperDiscussion paperOther research output

361 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

This article provides empirical tests of the hypothesis of optimal cognitive distance , proposed by Nooteboom (1999, 2000), in two distinct empirical settings.Variety of cognition, needed for learning, has two dimensions: the number of agents with different cognition, and differences in cognition between them (cognitive distance).The hypothesis is that in interfirm relationships optimal learning entails a trade-off between the advantage of increased cognitive distance for a higher novelty value of a partner s knowledge, and the disadvantage of less mutual understanding.If the value of learning is the mathematical product of novelty value and understandability, it has an inverse-U shaped relation with cognitive distance, with an optimum level that yields maximal value of learning.With auxiliary hypotheses, the hypothesis is tested on interfirm agreements between pharmaceutical companies and biotech companies, as well as on interfirm agreements in ICT industries.
Original languageEnglish
Place of PublicationTilburg
PublisherMarketing
Number of pages36
Volume2005-45
Publication statusPublished - 2005

Publication series

NameCentER Discussion Paper
Volume2005-45

Fingerprint

Cognitive distance
Empirical test
Cognition
Novelty
Biotech
Pharmaceuticals
ICT industry
Trade-offs
Disadvantage
Interfirm relationships

Keywords

  • alliances
  • innovation
  • organizational learning
  • biotechnology
  • ICT

Cite this

Wuyts, S. H. K., Colombo, M., Dutta, S., & Nooteboom, B. (2005). Empirical Tests of Optimal Cognitive Distance. (CentER Discussion Paper; Vol. 2005-45). Tilburg: Marketing.
Wuyts, S.H.K. ; Colombo, M. ; Dutta, S. ; Nooteboom, B. / Empirical Tests of Optimal Cognitive Distance. Tilburg : Marketing, 2005. (CentER Discussion Paper).
@techreport{bb2687cd57244e0ca58ca6546cc61eeb,
title = "Empirical Tests of Optimal Cognitive Distance",
abstract = "This article provides empirical tests of the hypothesis of optimal cognitive distance , proposed by Nooteboom (1999, 2000), in two distinct empirical settings.Variety of cognition, needed for learning, has two dimensions: the number of agents with different cognition, and differences in cognition between them (cognitive distance).The hypothesis is that in interfirm relationships optimal learning entails a trade-off between the advantage of increased cognitive distance for a higher novelty value of a partner s knowledge, and the disadvantage of less mutual understanding.If the value of learning is the mathematical product of novelty value and understandability, it has an inverse-U shaped relation with cognitive distance, with an optimum level that yields maximal value of learning.With auxiliary hypotheses, the hypothesis is tested on interfirm agreements between pharmaceutical companies and biotech companies, as well as on interfirm agreements in ICT industries.",
keywords = "alliances, innovation, organizational learning, biotechnology, ICT",
author = "S.H.K. Wuyts and M. Colombo and S. Dutta and B. Nooteboom",
note = "Pagination: 36",
year = "2005",
language = "English",
volume = "2005-45",
series = "CentER Discussion Paper",
publisher = "Marketing",
type = "WorkingPaper",
institution = "Marketing",

}

Wuyts, SHK, Colombo, M, Dutta, S & Nooteboom, B 2005 'Empirical Tests of Optimal Cognitive Distance' CentER Discussion Paper, vol. 2005-45, Marketing, Tilburg.

Empirical Tests of Optimal Cognitive Distance. / Wuyts, S.H.K.; Colombo, M.; Dutta, S.; Nooteboom, B.

Tilburg : Marketing, 2005. (CentER Discussion Paper; Vol. 2005-45).

Research output: Working paperDiscussion paperOther research output

TY - UNPB

T1 - Empirical Tests of Optimal Cognitive Distance

AU - Wuyts, S.H.K.

AU - Colombo, M.

AU - Dutta, S.

AU - Nooteboom, B.

N1 - Pagination: 36

PY - 2005

Y1 - 2005

N2 - This article provides empirical tests of the hypothesis of optimal cognitive distance , proposed by Nooteboom (1999, 2000), in two distinct empirical settings.Variety of cognition, needed for learning, has two dimensions: the number of agents with different cognition, and differences in cognition between them (cognitive distance).The hypothesis is that in interfirm relationships optimal learning entails a trade-off between the advantage of increased cognitive distance for a higher novelty value of a partner s knowledge, and the disadvantage of less mutual understanding.If the value of learning is the mathematical product of novelty value and understandability, it has an inverse-U shaped relation with cognitive distance, with an optimum level that yields maximal value of learning.With auxiliary hypotheses, the hypothesis is tested on interfirm agreements between pharmaceutical companies and biotech companies, as well as on interfirm agreements in ICT industries.

AB - This article provides empirical tests of the hypothesis of optimal cognitive distance , proposed by Nooteboom (1999, 2000), in two distinct empirical settings.Variety of cognition, needed for learning, has two dimensions: the number of agents with different cognition, and differences in cognition between them (cognitive distance).The hypothesis is that in interfirm relationships optimal learning entails a trade-off between the advantage of increased cognitive distance for a higher novelty value of a partner s knowledge, and the disadvantage of less mutual understanding.If the value of learning is the mathematical product of novelty value and understandability, it has an inverse-U shaped relation with cognitive distance, with an optimum level that yields maximal value of learning.With auxiliary hypotheses, the hypothesis is tested on interfirm agreements between pharmaceutical companies and biotech companies, as well as on interfirm agreements in ICT industries.

KW - alliances

KW - innovation

KW - organizational learning

KW - biotechnology

KW - ICT

M3 - Discussion paper

VL - 2005-45

T3 - CentER Discussion Paper

BT - Empirical Tests of Optimal Cognitive Distance

PB - Marketing

CY - Tilburg

ER -

Wuyts SHK, Colombo M, Dutta S, Nooteboom B. Empirical Tests of Optimal Cognitive Distance. Tilburg: Marketing. 2005. (CentER Discussion Paper).