Enhancing climate resilience of transboundary water allocation agreements

The impact of shortening the agreement’s lifetime on cooperation stability

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

    Abstract

    Efficient use of transboundary rivers under climate change requires periodic adaptation of their governing regime to the hydrological realities of the basin. Applying a short-term time horizon to an agreement on water allocation can make it easier for the riparian states to update the terms of their cooperation periodically, and thus, adapt them to changes in water availability resulting from climate change. However, agreements with a pre-agreed termination date can only increase the efficiency of water use if they lead to a stable cooperation. In this paper, I analyze how riparian states’ previous knowledge of the termination date of a water allocation agreement affects the agreement’s stability. The results show that when riparian states are aware of the agreement’s termination date, there is a higher chance for them to free-ride. However, certain cases may occur in which previous knowledge of the agreement’s termination date can contribute to the stability of an agreement by enforcing compliance.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)707-722
    Number of pages16
    JournalInternational Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics
    Volume18
    Issue number5
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 2018

    Fingerprint

    resilience
    climate
    water
    climate change
    river
    regime
    efficiency
    Water allocation
    Climate
    Resilience
    Transboundary
    Termination
    Climate change

    Cite this

    @article{15bef56699d64b678394bb6417023fa9,
    title = "Enhancing climate resilience of transboundary water allocation agreements: The impact of shortening the agreement’s lifetime on cooperation stability",
    abstract = "Efficient use of transboundary rivers under climate change requires periodic adaptation of their governing regime to the hydrological realities of the basin. Applying a short-term time horizon to an agreement on water allocation can make it easier for the riparian states to update the terms of their cooperation periodically, and thus, adapt them to changes in water availability resulting from climate change. However, agreements with a pre-agreed termination date can only increase the efficiency of water use if they lead to a stable cooperation. In this paper, I analyze how riparian states’ previous knowledge of the termination date of a water allocation agreement affects the agreement’s stability. The results show that when riparian states are aware of the agreement’s termination date, there is a higher chance for them to free-ride. However, certain cases may occur in which previous knowledge of the agreement’s termination date can contribute to the stability of an agreement by enforcing compliance.",
    author = "Maryam Jafroudi",
    year = "2018",
    doi = "10.1007/s10784-018-9412-2",
    language = "English",
    volume = "18",
    pages = "707--722",
    journal = "International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics",
    issn = "1567-9764",
    publisher = "Springere",
    number = "5",

    }

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - Enhancing climate resilience of transboundary water allocation agreements

    T2 - The impact of shortening the agreement’s lifetime on cooperation stability

    AU - Jafroudi, Maryam

    PY - 2018

    Y1 - 2018

    N2 - Efficient use of transboundary rivers under climate change requires periodic adaptation of their governing regime to the hydrological realities of the basin. Applying a short-term time horizon to an agreement on water allocation can make it easier for the riparian states to update the terms of their cooperation periodically, and thus, adapt them to changes in water availability resulting from climate change. However, agreements with a pre-agreed termination date can only increase the efficiency of water use if they lead to a stable cooperation. In this paper, I analyze how riparian states’ previous knowledge of the termination date of a water allocation agreement affects the agreement’s stability. The results show that when riparian states are aware of the agreement’s termination date, there is a higher chance for them to free-ride. However, certain cases may occur in which previous knowledge of the agreement’s termination date can contribute to the stability of an agreement by enforcing compliance.

    AB - Efficient use of transboundary rivers under climate change requires periodic adaptation of their governing regime to the hydrological realities of the basin. Applying a short-term time horizon to an agreement on water allocation can make it easier for the riparian states to update the terms of their cooperation periodically, and thus, adapt them to changes in water availability resulting from climate change. However, agreements with a pre-agreed termination date can only increase the efficiency of water use if they lead to a stable cooperation. In this paper, I analyze how riparian states’ previous knowledge of the termination date of a water allocation agreement affects the agreement’s stability. The results show that when riparian states are aware of the agreement’s termination date, there is a higher chance for them to free-ride. However, certain cases may occur in which previous knowledge of the agreement’s termination date can contribute to the stability of an agreement by enforcing compliance.

    U2 - 10.1007/s10784-018-9412-2

    DO - 10.1007/s10784-018-9412-2

    M3 - Article

    VL - 18

    SP - 707

    EP - 722

    JO - International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics

    JF - International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics

    SN - 1567-9764

    IS - 5

    ER -