Equality and Tax Law

A Matter of Principle

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contributionScientificpeer-review

Abstract

Nowadays, tax legislation provides fewer safeguards as regards general principles of justice such as legal certainty, equality, impartiality and neutrality. This article shows that the concept of checks and balances is indispensable in tax law. By reviewing tax legislation, the Netherlands Supreme Court functions as a check on the legislature. The Court has dealt with several issues concerning the principle of equality in Dutch tax law. This fundamental principle is the most important judicial instrument to check seriously flawed tax legislation. Thus, the case law of the tax division of the Netherlands Supreme Court is in line with the case law of the ECtHR. The judiciary has the task to ensure the legislature's compliance with the principle of equality. As for testing of tax law against the principle of equality, the Netherlands Supreme Court acknowledges the primary margin of appreciation of the legislator. This goes for judging the equality of cases as well as for judging whether there is an objective and reasonable justification for any inequality of treatment. Most courts, therefore, seldom 'overrule' the legislature. They generally leave the democratically legitimized legislature a wide margin of appreciation. If the Court does establish a violation of the principle of equality, it subsequently acts very carefully. When no unambiguous resolution is available to eliminate the unjustified unequal treatment of equal cases, the Court leaves the choice to the legislator, which has to bring the legislation in accordance with the principle of equality in the short term. The tax division of the Netherlands Supreme Court has, thus, made a valuable contribution to the constitutional system of checks and balances. The Court underlines the significance of the principle of equality for fair tax legislation. After all, each violation of the principle of equality damages the quality of the tax system.
Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationL' année fiscale
Place of PublicationParis
PublisherPresses Universitaires de France
Pages127-143
Number of pages17
ISBN (Print)2130551769
Publication statusPublished - 2005

Fingerprint

tax law
equality
tax legislation
Supreme Court
Netherlands
case law
taxes
tax system
neutrality
judiciary
damages
justice
legislation

Cite this

Gribnau, J. L. M., & Happé, R. H. (2005). Equality and Tax Law: A Matter of Principle. In L' année fiscale (pp. 127-143). Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.
Gribnau, J.L.M. ; Happé, R.H. / Equality and Tax Law : A Matter of Principle. L' année fiscale. Paris : Presses Universitaires de France, 2005. pp. 127-143
@inproceedings{f868d2d61a9d4b559de5f4e83d486b1f,
title = "Equality and Tax Law: A Matter of Principle",
abstract = "Nowadays, tax legislation provides fewer safeguards as regards general principles of justice such as legal certainty, equality, impartiality and neutrality. This article shows that the concept of checks and balances is indispensable in tax law. By reviewing tax legislation, the Netherlands Supreme Court functions as a check on the legislature. The Court has dealt with several issues concerning the principle of equality in Dutch tax law. This fundamental principle is the most important judicial instrument to check seriously flawed tax legislation. Thus, the case law of the tax division of the Netherlands Supreme Court is in line with the case law of the ECtHR. The judiciary has the task to ensure the legislature's compliance with the principle of equality. As for testing of tax law against the principle of equality, the Netherlands Supreme Court acknowledges the primary margin of appreciation of the legislator. This goes for judging the equality of cases as well as for judging whether there is an objective and reasonable justification for any inequality of treatment. Most courts, therefore, seldom 'overrule' the legislature. They generally leave the democratically legitimized legislature a wide margin of appreciation. If the Court does establish a violation of the principle of equality, it subsequently acts very carefully. When no unambiguous resolution is available to eliminate the unjustified unequal treatment of equal cases, the Court leaves the choice to the legislator, which has to bring the legislation in accordance with the principle of equality in the short term. The tax division of the Netherlands Supreme Court has, thus, made a valuable contribution to the constitutional system of checks and balances. The Court underlines the significance of the principle of equality for fair tax legislation. After all, each violation of the principle of equality damages the quality of the tax system.",
author = "J.L.M. Gribnau and R.H. Happ{\'e}",
note = "Pagination: 17",
year = "2005",
language = "English",
isbn = "2130551769",
pages = "127--143",
booktitle = "L' ann{\'e}e fiscale",
publisher = "Presses Universitaires de France",
address = "France",

}

Gribnau, JLM & Happé, RH 2005, Equality and Tax Law: A Matter of Principle. in L' année fiscale. Presses Universitaires de France, Paris, pp. 127-143.

Equality and Tax Law : A Matter of Principle. / Gribnau, J.L.M.; Happé, R.H.

L' année fiscale. Paris : Presses Universitaires de France, 2005. p. 127-143.

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contributionScientificpeer-review

TY - GEN

T1 - Equality and Tax Law

T2 - A Matter of Principle

AU - Gribnau, J.L.M.

AU - Happé, R.H.

N1 - Pagination: 17

PY - 2005

Y1 - 2005

N2 - Nowadays, tax legislation provides fewer safeguards as regards general principles of justice such as legal certainty, equality, impartiality and neutrality. This article shows that the concept of checks and balances is indispensable in tax law. By reviewing tax legislation, the Netherlands Supreme Court functions as a check on the legislature. The Court has dealt with several issues concerning the principle of equality in Dutch tax law. This fundamental principle is the most important judicial instrument to check seriously flawed tax legislation. Thus, the case law of the tax division of the Netherlands Supreme Court is in line with the case law of the ECtHR. The judiciary has the task to ensure the legislature's compliance with the principle of equality. As for testing of tax law against the principle of equality, the Netherlands Supreme Court acknowledges the primary margin of appreciation of the legislator. This goes for judging the equality of cases as well as for judging whether there is an objective and reasonable justification for any inequality of treatment. Most courts, therefore, seldom 'overrule' the legislature. They generally leave the democratically legitimized legislature a wide margin of appreciation. If the Court does establish a violation of the principle of equality, it subsequently acts very carefully. When no unambiguous resolution is available to eliminate the unjustified unequal treatment of equal cases, the Court leaves the choice to the legislator, which has to bring the legislation in accordance with the principle of equality in the short term. The tax division of the Netherlands Supreme Court has, thus, made a valuable contribution to the constitutional system of checks and balances. The Court underlines the significance of the principle of equality for fair tax legislation. After all, each violation of the principle of equality damages the quality of the tax system.

AB - Nowadays, tax legislation provides fewer safeguards as regards general principles of justice such as legal certainty, equality, impartiality and neutrality. This article shows that the concept of checks and balances is indispensable in tax law. By reviewing tax legislation, the Netherlands Supreme Court functions as a check on the legislature. The Court has dealt with several issues concerning the principle of equality in Dutch tax law. This fundamental principle is the most important judicial instrument to check seriously flawed tax legislation. Thus, the case law of the tax division of the Netherlands Supreme Court is in line with the case law of the ECtHR. The judiciary has the task to ensure the legislature's compliance with the principle of equality. As for testing of tax law against the principle of equality, the Netherlands Supreme Court acknowledges the primary margin of appreciation of the legislator. This goes for judging the equality of cases as well as for judging whether there is an objective and reasonable justification for any inequality of treatment. Most courts, therefore, seldom 'overrule' the legislature. They generally leave the democratically legitimized legislature a wide margin of appreciation. If the Court does establish a violation of the principle of equality, it subsequently acts very carefully. When no unambiguous resolution is available to eliminate the unjustified unequal treatment of equal cases, the Court leaves the choice to the legislator, which has to bring the legislation in accordance with the principle of equality in the short term. The tax division of the Netherlands Supreme Court has, thus, made a valuable contribution to the constitutional system of checks and balances. The Court underlines the significance of the principle of equality for fair tax legislation. After all, each violation of the principle of equality damages the quality of the tax system.

M3 - Conference contribution

SN - 2130551769

SP - 127

EP - 143

BT - L' année fiscale

PB - Presses Universitaires de France

CY - Paris

ER -

Gribnau JLM, Happé RH. Equality and Tax Law: A Matter of Principle. In L' année fiscale. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France. 2005. p. 127-143