EU labelling practices for products imported from disputed territories

Olia Kanevskaia

Research output: Working paperDiscussion paperOther research output

Abstract

On 13 June 2019, Advocate General Hogan issued his opinion on Case C-363/18 Organisation juive européenne, Vignoble Psagot Ltd v Ministre de l'Economie et des Finances, currently pending with the Court of Justice. In this case, referred by the Conseil d’État, the Court was invited to rule whether EU law requires for products originating in a territory occupied by Israel since 1967 (“Israeli settlements”), an indication that the product comes from that territory. While this question was answered affirmatively by the Advocate General, it remains unclear if the Court’s forthcoming decision, whether or not it will follow Mr. Hogan’s opinion, will have consequences on EU trade policy for occupied, disputed or annexed territories other than Israeli settlements.

This paper aims to review TBT measures adopted by the EU against the territories whose military and economic occupation was openly condemned by international arena. By examining the EU’s trade agreements with States that claim sovereignty over the disputed territories, it reveals which rules of origin apply to products imported into the EU from the Israeli settlements, Turkish Republic of Northern Cyprus, Western Sahara and Crimea. In particular, this paper focuses on conditions that exporters have to fulfil to bring their product into the EU under preferential trading rules. The findings suggest that the EU lacks coherence both in its policy and practice towards trade with disputed territories, which in turn undermines the effectiveness of its measures and weakens the EU’s position in international arena.
Original languageEnglish
Number of pages24
Publication statusPublished - 19 Jul 2019

Publication series

NameTILEC Discussion Paper Series
No.15
Volume2019

Fingerprint

EU
Israeli
Western Sahara
occupied territory
court of justice
European Law
trade policy
Cyprus
court decision
sovereignty
indication
Israel
finance
occupation
Military
lack
economics

Keywords

  • rules of origin
  • technical barriers to trade
  • labelling
  • occupied territories

Cite this

Kanevskaia, O. (2019). EU labelling practices for products imported from disputed territories. (TILEC Discussion Paper Series ; Vol. 2019, No. 15).
Kanevskaia, Olia. / EU labelling practices for products imported from disputed territories. 2019. (TILEC Discussion Paper Series ; 15).
@techreport{d729639556c9447c9992d33856b744b2,
title = "EU labelling practices for products imported from disputed territories",
abstract = "On 13 June 2019, Advocate General Hogan issued his opinion on Case C-363/18 Organisation juive europ{\'e}enne, Vignoble Psagot Ltd v Ministre de l'Economie et des Finances, currently pending with the Court of Justice. In this case, referred by the Conseil d’{\'E}tat, the Court was invited to rule whether EU law requires for products originating in a territory occupied by Israel since 1967 (“Israeli settlements”), an indication that the product comes from that territory. While this question was answered affirmatively by the Advocate General, it remains unclear if the Court’s forthcoming decision, whether or not it will follow Mr. Hogan’s opinion, will have consequences on EU trade policy for occupied, disputed or annexed territories other than Israeli settlements.This paper aims to review TBT measures adopted by the EU against the territories whose military and economic occupation was openly condemned by international arena. By examining the EU’s trade agreements with States that claim sovereignty over the disputed territories, it reveals which rules of origin apply to products imported into the EU from the Israeli settlements, Turkish Republic of Northern Cyprus, Western Sahara and Crimea. In particular, this paper focuses on conditions that exporters have to fulfil to bring their product into the EU under preferential trading rules. The findings suggest that the EU lacks coherence both in its policy and practice towards trade with disputed territories, which in turn undermines the effectiveness of its measures and weakens the EU’s position in international arena.",
keywords = "rules of origin, technical barriers to trade, labelling, occupied territories",
author = "Olia Kanevskaia",
year = "2019",
month = "7",
day = "19",
language = "English",
series = "TILEC Discussion Paper Series",
number = "15",
type = "WorkingPaper",

}

Kanevskaia, O 2019 'EU labelling practices for products imported from disputed territories' TILEC Discussion Paper Series , no. 15, vol. 2019.

EU labelling practices for products imported from disputed territories. / Kanevskaia, Olia.

2019. (TILEC Discussion Paper Series ; Vol. 2019, No. 15).

Research output: Working paperDiscussion paperOther research output

TY - UNPB

T1 - EU labelling practices for products imported from disputed territories

AU - Kanevskaia, Olia

PY - 2019/7/19

Y1 - 2019/7/19

N2 - On 13 June 2019, Advocate General Hogan issued his opinion on Case C-363/18 Organisation juive européenne, Vignoble Psagot Ltd v Ministre de l'Economie et des Finances, currently pending with the Court of Justice. In this case, referred by the Conseil d’État, the Court was invited to rule whether EU law requires for products originating in a territory occupied by Israel since 1967 (“Israeli settlements”), an indication that the product comes from that territory. While this question was answered affirmatively by the Advocate General, it remains unclear if the Court’s forthcoming decision, whether or not it will follow Mr. Hogan’s opinion, will have consequences on EU trade policy for occupied, disputed or annexed territories other than Israeli settlements.This paper aims to review TBT measures adopted by the EU against the territories whose military and economic occupation was openly condemned by international arena. By examining the EU’s trade agreements with States that claim sovereignty over the disputed territories, it reveals which rules of origin apply to products imported into the EU from the Israeli settlements, Turkish Republic of Northern Cyprus, Western Sahara and Crimea. In particular, this paper focuses on conditions that exporters have to fulfil to bring their product into the EU under preferential trading rules. The findings suggest that the EU lacks coherence both in its policy and practice towards trade with disputed territories, which in turn undermines the effectiveness of its measures and weakens the EU’s position in international arena.

AB - On 13 June 2019, Advocate General Hogan issued his opinion on Case C-363/18 Organisation juive européenne, Vignoble Psagot Ltd v Ministre de l'Economie et des Finances, currently pending with the Court of Justice. In this case, referred by the Conseil d’État, the Court was invited to rule whether EU law requires for products originating in a territory occupied by Israel since 1967 (“Israeli settlements”), an indication that the product comes from that territory. While this question was answered affirmatively by the Advocate General, it remains unclear if the Court’s forthcoming decision, whether or not it will follow Mr. Hogan’s opinion, will have consequences on EU trade policy for occupied, disputed or annexed territories other than Israeli settlements.This paper aims to review TBT measures adopted by the EU against the territories whose military and economic occupation was openly condemned by international arena. By examining the EU’s trade agreements with States that claim sovereignty over the disputed territories, it reveals which rules of origin apply to products imported into the EU from the Israeli settlements, Turkish Republic of Northern Cyprus, Western Sahara and Crimea. In particular, this paper focuses on conditions that exporters have to fulfil to bring their product into the EU under preferential trading rules. The findings suggest that the EU lacks coherence both in its policy and practice towards trade with disputed territories, which in turn undermines the effectiveness of its measures and weakens the EU’s position in international arena.

KW - rules of origin

KW - technical barriers to trade

KW - labelling

KW - occupied territories

M3 - Discussion paper

T3 - TILEC Discussion Paper Series

BT - EU labelling practices for products imported from disputed territories

ER -

Kanevskaia O. EU labelling practices for products imported from disputed territories. 2019 Jul 19. (TILEC Discussion Paper Series ; 15).