European Union - Compatibility with fundamental freedoms of a municipal surcharge distinguishing between residents and non-Residents for the purposes of the applicable rate: Opinion statement ECJ-TF 4/2023 on the decision of the EFTA court of 4 July 2023 in RS (Case E-11/22)

Alfredo Garcia Prats*, Werner Haslehner*, Eric Kemmeren, Georg Kofler*, Michael Lang*, João Félix Pinto Nogueira*, Christiana HJI Panayi*, Stella Raventos-Calvo*, Isabelle Richelle*, Alexander Rust

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleProfessional

Abstract

This is an Opinion Statement prepared by the CFE ECJ Task Force on the RS case, in which the EFTA Court delivered its decision on 4 July 2023. At issue in the RS case was the question whether and to what extent municipal surcharges are compatible with the fundamental freedoms. In Liechtenstein, workers were subject to an income tax at national level. In addition, the income of resident workers was also taxable at the level of the municipality in the form of a municipal surcharge. The tax rates for the municipal surcharge varied from municipality to municipality. Non-resident workers were not subject to the municipal surcharge but to a surcharge which was a supplementary national tax. The tax rate for the supplementary national tax was higher than the highest municipal tax rate. The EFTA Court ruled that non-resident workers may not be subjected to a higher rate of taxation than the lowest municipal tax rate.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)115-118
Number of pages4
JournalEuropean Taxation
Volume64
Issue number2/3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jan 2024

Keywords

  • municipal surcharges
  • EU tax law
  • free movement of workers

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'European Union - Compatibility with fundamental freedoms of a municipal surcharge distinguishing between residents and non-Residents for the purposes of the applicable rate: Opinion statement ECJ-TF 4/2023 on the decision of the EFTA court of 4 July 2023 in RS (Case E-11/22)'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this