Evaluating a staff training program on the interaction between staff and people with intellectual disability and challenging behaviour: An observational study

P.J.C.M. Embregts*, L. Zijlmans, L. Gerits, A.M.T. Bosman

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

9 Citations (Scopus)
123 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Background:
The aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of a training program focusing on improvement of emotional intelligence (EI) and support staffs’ awareness of their behaviour towards people with an intellectual disability based on interactional patterns. The support provided regarding the needs for autonomy, relatedness, and competence was observed in line with self-determination theory (SDT).
Method:
A pre-test–post-test control group design (N = 29) was used, with 17 support staff participating in the experimental group. For both groups, video recordings of interactions between staff and clients were analysed with an SDT-observation system.
Results:
The results showed that a training program focusing on EI and interactional patterns positively affected the support provided by staff with regard to clients’ needs for autonomy, relatedness, and competence.
Conclusions:
As most EI studies focus on insights and understanding of oneself, this study is an important first step in focusing on staff behaviour during daily interactions.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)131-138
JournalJournal of Intellectual and Developmental Disability
Volume44
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2019

Keywords

  • ADOLESCENTS
  • BURNOUT
  • EMOTIONAL INTELLIGENCE
  • IMPACT
  • INTRINSIC MOTIVATION
  • Intellectual disability
  • SELF-DETERMINATION THEORY
  • SERVICES
  • STRESS
  • SUPPORT STAFF
  • WORKING
  • observational study
  • self-determination theory
  • staff training

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Evaluating a staff training program on the interaction between staff and people with intellectual disability and challenging behaviour: An observational study'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this