Evaluating the learning outcomes of interfaith initiatives: a systematic literature review

Hannah J. Visser*, Anke I. Liefbroer, Linda J. Schoonmade

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Interfaith initiatives are seen as promising sites for societal change and personal transformation. However, many questions about the actual outcomes of such initiatives have remained unanswered. Therefore, a systematic review was conducted, focusing on 1) the outcomes of interfaith initiatives and 2) the methods used to evaluate these outcomes. This review analyses 47 empirical studies on interfaith initiatives. The review of the initiatives’ outcomes indicates that interfaith initiatives can positively impact participants’ knowledge about other worldviews, communication skills and appreciation for other worldviews. At the same time, it can be challenging for interfaith initiatives to positively impact participants’ knowledge of socio-political challenges, awareness of power imbalance and privilege and behaviour as interfaith leaders. The analysis of the methods used to evaluate the impact of inter-faith initiatives shows that most studies used qualitative methods. For studies using quantitative or mixed methods designs, a variety of measurement instruments were used, whereby there was little overlap or consensus regarding the concepts being used. The findings of this article will stimulate scholars to focus more on learning activities and evaluation methods that take societal learning out-comes into consideration. It emphasises the need to build on previous evaluation and research efforts.
Original languageEnglish
Number of pages24
JournalJournal of Beliefs and Values
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 17 Apr 2023

Keywords

  • Interfaith
  • evaluation
  • learning outcomes
  • systematic review

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Evaluating the learning outcomes of interfaith initiatives: a systematic literature review'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this