Evaluating the quality of Dutch academic legal publications

Results from a survey

W.H. van Boom, Rob van Gestel

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

Abstract

In the Netherlands, law as an academic discipline seems to be moving from the humanities towards the social sciences. This transition has an impact on how the quality of legal research is perceived and assessed. Legal scholars appear to have different epistemic and strategic agendas with regard to what counts as an academic or professional publication, whether law journals and legal publishers should opt for peer review or the use of metrics to evaluate the quality of legal research, and what the purpose of research evaluation by law schools should be. Behind this are long-term developments that have an impact on legal scholarship, such as a movement from national-oriented research towards a more European and international focus, a shift in focus from monodisciplinarity to multi- and interdisciplinarity in legal research, and a potential shift from financing legal research via lump sum budgeting towards more competition for research funding. These developments are important for the identity of Dutch academic legal research. This is the reason why we undertook a survey among Dutch legal scholars in order to ask them how they feel about the quality of research in general and publications in particular, as well as how this quality should be valued and assessed.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)9-27
JournalUtrecht Law Review
Volume13
Issue number3
Publication statusPublished - 2017

Fingerprint

interdisciplinarity
Law
evaluation research
school law
peer review
Netherlands
social science
funding

Cite this

@article{048bfcc8dc8d4099a3034a9c182e7ea8,
title = "Evaluating the quality of Dutch academic legal publications: Results from a survey",
abstract = "In the Netherlands, law as an academic discipline seems to be moving from the humanities towards the social sciences. This transition has an impact on how the quality of legal research is perceived and assessed. Legal scholars appear to have different epistemic and strategic agendas with regard to what counts as an academic or professional publication, whether law journals and legal publishers should opt for peer review or the use of metrics to evaluate the quality of legal research, and what the purpose of research evaluation by law schools should be. Behind this are long-term developments that have an impact on legal scholarship, such as a movement from national-oriented research towards a more European and international focus, a shift in focus from monodisciplinarity to multi- and interdisciplinarity in legal research, and a potential shift from financing legal research via lump sum budgeting towards more competition for research funding. These developments are important for the identity of Dutch academic legal research. This is the reason why we undertook a survey among Dutch legal scholars in order to ask them how they feel about the quality of research in general and publications in particular, as well as how this quality should be valued and assessed.",
author = "{van Boom}, W.H. and {van Gestel}, Rob",
year = "2017",
language = "English",
volume = "13",
pages = "9--27",
journal = "Utrecht Law Review",
issn = "1871-515X",
publisher = "Igitur, Utrecht Publishing and Archiving Services",
number = "3",

}

Evaluating the quality of Dutch academic legal publications : Results from a survey. / van Boom, W.H.; van Gestel, Rob.

In: Utrecht Law Review, Vol. 13, No. 3, 2017, p. 9-27.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Evaluating the quality of Dutch academic legal publications

T2 - Results from a survey

AU - van Boom, W.H.

AU - van Gestel, Rob

PY - 2017

Y1 - 2017

N2 - In the Netherlands, law as an academic discipline seems to be moving from the humanities towards the social sciences. This transition has an impact on how the quality of legal research is perceived and assessed. Legal scholars appear to have different epistemic and strategic agendas with regard to what counts as an academic or professional publication, whether law journals and legal publishers should opt for peer review or the use of metrics to evaluate the quality of legal research, and what the purpose of research evaluation by law schools should be. Behind this are long-term developments that have an impact on legal scholarship, such as a movement from national-oriented research towards a more European and international focus, a shift in focus from monodisciplinarity to multi- and interdisciplinarity in legal research, and a potential shift from financing legal research via lump sum budgeting towards more competition for research funding. These developments are important for the identity of Dutch academic legal research. This is the reason why we undertook a survey among Dutch legal scholars in order to ask them how they feel about the quality of research in general and publications in particular, as well as how this quality should be valued and assessed.

AB - In the Netherlands, law as an academic discipline seems to be moving from the humanities towards the social sciences. This transition has an impact on how the quality of legal research is perceived and assessed. Legal scholars appear to have different epistemic and strategic agendas with regard to what counts as an academic or professional publication, whether law journals and legal publishers should opt for peer review or the use of metrics to evaluate the quality of legal research, and what the purpose of research evaluation by law schools should be. Behind this are long-term developments that have an impact on legal scholarship, such as a movement from national-oriented research towards a more European and international focus, a shift in focus from monodisciplinarity to multi- and interdisciplinarity in legal research, and a potential shift from financing legal research via lump sum budgeting towards more competition for research funding. These developments are important for the identity of Dutch academic legal research. This is the reason why we undertook a survey among Dutch legal scholars in order to ask them how they feel about the quality of research in general and publications in particular, as well as how this quality should be valued and assessed.

M3 - Article

VL - 13

SP - 9

EP - 27

JO - Utrecht Law Review

JF - Utrecht Law Review

SN - 1871-515X

IS - 3

ER -