Everyday life after a hip fracture:

What community-living older adults perceive as most beneficial for their recovery

M. Pol*, S. Peek, F. van Nes, M. van Hartingsveldt, B. Buurman, B. Kröse

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

1 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Objective:
To gain insight into what older adults after hip fracture perceive as most beneficial to their recovery to everyday life.
Design:
Qualitative research approach.
Setting:
Six skilled nursing facilities.
Participants:
19 older community dwelling older adults (aged 65–94), who had recently received geriatric rehabilitation after hip fracture.
Methods:
semi-structured interviews were conducted with 19 older adults after hip fracture. Coding techniques based on constructivist grounded theory were applied.
Results:
Four categories were derived from the data: ‘restrictions for everyday life’, ‘recovery process’, ‘resources for recovery’ and ‘performing everyday activities’. Physical and psychological restrictions are consequences of hip fracture that older adults have struggled to address during recovery. Three different resources were found to be beneficial for recovery; ‘supporting and coaching’,
‘myself’ and ‘technological support’. These resources influenced the recovery process. Having successful experiences during recovery led to doing everyday activities in the same manner as before; unsuccessful experiences led to ceasing certain activities altogether.
Conclusion:
Participants highlight their own role (‘myself’) as essential for recovery. Additionally, coaching provides emotional support, which boosts self-confidence in performing everyday activities. Furthermore, technology can encourage older adults to become more active and being engaged in the recovery process. The findings suggest that more attention should be paid to follow-up interventions after discharge from inpatient rehabilitation to support older adults in finding new routines in their everyday activities. A conceptual model is presented and provides an understanding of the participants’ experiences and perspectives concerning their process of recovery after hip fracture to everyday life.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)440-447
JournalAge and Ageing
Volume48
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2019

Fingerprint

Independent Living
Geriatrics
Inpatients
Interviews
Mentoring

Keywords

  • COMPENSATION
  • CONSEQUENCES
  • EXPERIENCES
  • FUNCTIONAL RECOVERY
  • OPTIMIZATION
  • SELECTION
  • coaching
  • everyday activities
  • geriatric rehabilitation
  • older people
  • resources for recovery
  • technology

Cite this

Pol, M. ; Peek, S. ; van Nes, F. ; van Hartingsveldt, M. ; Buurman, B. ; Kröse, B. / Everyday life after a hip fracture: What community-living older adults perceive as most beneficial for their recovery. In: Age and Ageing. 2019 ; Vol. 48, No. 3. pp. 440-447.
@article{5516bce5c4d64924a02658c149a7b558,
title = "Everyday life after a hip fracture:: What community-living older adults perceive as most beneficial for their recovery",
abstract = "Objective: To gain insight into what older adults after hip fracture perceive as most beneficial to their recovery to everyday life.Design: Qualitative research approach.Setting: Six skilled nursing facilities.Participants: 19 older community dwelling older adults (aged 65–94), who had recently received geriatric rehabilitation after hip fracture.Methods: semi-structured interviews were conducted with 19 older adults after hip fracture. Coding techniques based on constructivist grounded theory were applied.Results: Four categories were derived from the data: ‘restrictions for everyday life’, ‘recovery process’, ‘resources for recovery’ and ‘performing everyday activities’. Physical and psychological restrictions are consequences of hip fracture that older adults have struggled to address during recovery. Three different resources were found to be beneficial for recovery; ‘supporting and coaching’,‘myself’ and ‘technological support’. These resources influenced the recovery process. Having successful experiences during recovery led to doing everyday activities in the same manner as before; unsuccessful experiences led to ceasing certain activities altogether.Conclusion: Participants highlight their own role (‘myself’) as essential for recovery. Additionally, coaching provides emotional support, which boosts self-confidence in performing everyday activities. Furthermore, technology can encourage older adults to become more active and being engaged in the recovery process. The findings suggest that more attention should be paid to follow-up interventions after discharge from inpatient rehabilitation to support older adults in finding new routines in their everyday activities. A conceptual model is presented and provides an understanding of the participants’ experiences and perspectives concerning their process of recovery after hip fracture to everyday life.",
keywords = "COMPENSATION, CONSEQUENCES, EXPERIENCES, FUNCTIONAL RECOVERY, OPTIMIZATION, SELECTION, coaching, everyday activities, geriatric rehabilitation, older people, resources for recovery, technology",
author = "M. Pol and S. Peek and {van Nes}, F. and {van Hartingsveldt}, M. and B. Buurman and B. Kr{\"o}se",
year = "2019",
doi = "10.1093/ageing/afz012",
language = "English",
volume = "48",
pages = "440--447",
journal = "Age and Ageing",
issn = "0002-0729",
publisher = "Oxford University Press",
number = "3",

}

Everyday life after a hip fracture: What community-living older adults perceive as most beneficial for their recovery. / Pol, M.; Peek, S.; van Nes, F.; van Hartingsveldt, M.; Buurman, B.; Kröse, B.

In: Age and Ageing, Vol. 48, No. 3, 2019, p. 440-447.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Everyday life after a hip fracture:

T2 - What community-living older adults perceive as most beneficial for their recovery

AU - Pol, M.

AU - Peek, S.

AU - van Nes, F.

AU - van Hartingsveldt, M.

AU - Buurman, B.

AU - Kröse, B.

PY - 2019

Y1 - 2019

N2 - Objective: To gain insight into what older adults after hip fracture perceive as most beneficial to their recovery to everyday life.Design: Qualitative research approach.Setting: Six skilled nursing facilities.Participants: 19 older community dwelling older adults (aged 65–94), who had recently received geriatric rehabilitation after hip fracture.Methods: semi-structured interviews were conducted with 19 older adults after hip fracture. Coding techniques based on constructivist grounded theory were applied.Results: Four categories were derived from the data: ‘restrictions for everyday life’, ‘recovery process’, ‘resources for recovery’ and ‘performing everyday activities’. Physical and psychological restrictions are consequences of hip fracture that older adults have struggled to address during recovery. Three different resources were found to be beneficial for recovery; ‘supporting and coaching’,‘myself’ and ‘technological support’. These resources influenced the recovery process. Having successful experiences during recovery led to doing everyday activities in the same manner as before; unsuccessful experiences led to ceasing certain activities altogether.Conclusion: Participants highlight their own role (‘myself’) as essential for recovery. Additionally, coaching provides emotional support, which boosts self-confidence in performing everyday activities. Furthermore, technology can encourage older adults to become more active and being engaged in the recovery process. The findings suggest that more attention should be paid to follow-up interventions after discharge from inpatient rehabilitation to support older adults in finding new routines in their everyday activities. A conceptual model is presented and provides an understanding of the participants’ experiences and perspectives concerning their process of recovery after hip fracture to everyday life.

AB - Objective: To gain insight into what older adults after hip fracture perceive as most beneficial to their recovery to everyday life.Design: Qualitative research approach.Setting: Six skilled nursing facilities.Participants: 19 older community dwelling older adults (aged 65–94), who had recently received geriatric rehabilitation after hip fracture.Methods: semi-structured interviews were conducted with 19 older adults after hip fracture. Coding techniques based on constructivist grounded theory were applied.Results: Four categories were derived from the data: ‘restrictions for everyday life’, ‘recovery process’, ‘resources for recovery’ and ‘performing everyday activities’. Physical and psychological restrictions are consequences of hip fracture that older adults have struggled to address during recovery. Three different resources were found to be beneficial for recovery; ‘supporting and coaching’,‘myself’ and ‘technological support’. These resources influenced the recovery process. Having successful experiences during recovery led to doing everyday activities in the same manner as before; unsuccessful experiences led to ceasing certain activities altogether.Conclusion: Participants highlight their own role (‘myself’) as essential for recovery. Additionally, coaching provides emotional support, which boosts self-confidence in performing everyday activities. Furthermore, technology can encourage older adults to become more active and being engaged in the recovery process. The findings suggest that more attention should be paid to follow-up interventions after discharge from inpatient rehabilitation to support older adults in finding new routines in their everyday activities. A conceptual model is presented and provides an understanding of the participants’ experiences and perspectives concerning their process of recovery after hip fracture to everyday life.

KW - COMPENSATION

KW - CONSEQUENCES

KW - EXPERIENCES

KW - FUNCTIONAL RECOVERY

KW - OPTIMIZATION

KW - SELECTION

KW - coaching

KW - everyday activities

KW - geriatric rehabilitation

KW - older people

KW - resources for recovery

KW - technology

U2 - 10.1093/ageing/afz012

DO - 10.1093/ageing/afz012

M3 - Article

VL - 48

SP - 440

EP - 447

JO - Age and Ageing

JF - Age and Ageing

SN - 0002-0729

IS - 3

ER -