Evidence for a cognitive bias of interpretation toward threat in individuals with a Type D personality

Delphine Grynberg, Yori Gidron, J. Denollet, Olivier Luminet

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

Abstract

Biological and behavioral mediators link Type D personality with a poor prognosis in heart disease. However, the mediator role of cognitive biases is still unknown. This study tested whether Type D individuals exhibit an interpretative bias for ambiguous social situations. For this aim we examined Type D and non-Type D individuals' evaluations of written social situations that varied in terms of situations' clarity (clear, ambiguous) and social judgment (neutral, negative). A convenience sample of 42 young, healthy adults rated each situation in relation to the difficulty of formulating a verbal response, anticipated distress, and perceived threat, and they completed the Type D personality scale (DS14; Denollet, 2005). Results showed an interpretation bias among Type D individuals, as they rated ambiguous or neutral situations as significantly more distressing compared to non-Type D individuals. Only clearly negative situations were rated similarly by Type D and non-Type D individuals. The discussion suggests that this interpretation bias in Type D individuals would increase their vulnerability to perceived stress.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)95-102
JournalJournal of Behavioral Medicine
Volume35
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2012

Fingerprint

Young Adult

Keywords

  • Adolescent
  • Adult
  • Attention
  • Depression
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Male
  • Personality
  • Personality Inventory
  • Social Perception

Cite this

Grynberg, Delphine ; Gidron, Yori ; Denollet, J. ; Luminet, Olivier. / Evidence for a cognitive bias of interpretation toward threat in individuals with a Type D personality. In: Journal of Behavioral Medicine. 2012 ; Vol. 35, No. 1. pp. 95-102.
@article{818308cef1a54abb86cc24a2313441e4,
title = "Evidence for a cognitive bias of interpretation toward threat in individuals with a Type D personality",
abstract = "Biological and behavioral mediators link Type D personality with a poor prognosis in heart disease. However, the mediator role of cognitive biases is still unknown. This study tested whether Type D individuals exhibit an interpretative bias for ambiguous social situations. For this aim we examined Type D and non-Type D individuals' evaluations of written social situations that varied in terms of situations' clarity (clear, ambiguous) and social judgment (neutral, negative). A convenience sample of 42 young, healthy adults rated each situation in relation to the difficulty of formulating a verbal response, anticipated distress, and perceived threat, and they completed the Type D personality scale (DS14; Denollet, 2005). Results showed an interpretation bias among Type D individuals, as they rated ambiguous or neutral situations as significantly more distressing compared to non-Type D individuals. Only clearly negative situations were rated similarly by Type D and non-Type D individuals. The discussion suggests that this interpretation bias in Type D individuals would increase their vulnerability to perceived stress.",
keywords = "Adolescent, Adult, Attention, Depression, Female, Humans, Male, Personality, Personality Inventory, Social Perception",
author = "Delphine Grynberg and Yori Gidron and J. Denollet and Olivier Luminet",
year = "2012",
doi = "10.1007/s10865-011-9351-7",
language = "English",
volume = "35",
pages = "95--102",
journal = "Journal of Behavioral Medicine",
issn = "0160-7715",
publisher = "KLUWER ACADEMIC/PLENUM PUBL",
number = "1",

}

Evidence for a cognitive bias of interpretation toward threat in individuals with a Type D personality. / Grynberg, Delphine; Gidron, Yori; Denollet, J.; Luminet, Olivier.

In: Journal of Behavioral Medicine, Vol. 35, No. 1, 2012, p. 95-102.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Evidence for a cognitive bias of interpretation toward threat in individuals with a Type D personality

AU - Grynberg, Delphine

AU - Gidron, Yori

AU - Denollet, J.

AU - Luminet, Olivier

PY - 2012

Y1 - 2012

N2 - Biological and behavioral mediators link Type D personality with a poor prognosis in heart disease. However, the mediator role of cognitive biases is still unknown. This study tested whether Type D individuals exhibit an interpretative bias for ambiguous social situations. For this aim we examined Type D and non-Type D individuals' evaluations of written social situations that varied in terms of situations' clarity (clear, ambiguous) and social judgment (neutral, negative). A convenience sample of 42 young, healthy adults rated each situation in relation to the difficulty of formulating a verbal response, anticipated distress, and perceived threat, and they completed the Type D personality scale (DS14; Denollet, 2005). Results showed an interpretation bias among Type D individuals, as they rated ambiguous or neutral situations as significantly more distressing compared to non-Type D individuals. Only clearly negative situations were rated similarly by Type D and non-Type D individuals. The discussion suggests that this interpretation bias in Type D individuals would increase their vulnerability to perceived stress.

AB - Biological and behavioral mediators link Type D personality with a poor prognosis in heart disease. However, the mediator role of cognitive biases is still unknown. This study tested whether Type D individuals exhibit an interpretative bias for ambiguous social situations. For this aim we examined Type D and non-Type D individuals' evaluations of written social situations that varied in terms of situations' clarity (clear, ambiguous) and social judgment (neutral, negative). A convenience sample of 42 young, healthy adults rated each situation in relation to the difficulty of formulating a verbal response, anticipated distress, and perceived threat, and they completed the Type D personality scale (DS14; Denollet, 2005). Results showed an interpretation bias among Type D individuals, as they rated ambiguous or neutral situations as significantly more distressing compared to non-Type D individuals. Only clearly negative situations were rated similarly by Type D and non-Type D individuals. The discussion suggests that this interpretation bias in Type D individuals would increase their vulnerability to perceived stress.

KW - Adolescent

KW - Adult

KW - Attention

KW - Depression

KW - Female

KW - Humans

KW - Male

KW - Personality

KW - Personality Inventory

KW - Social Perception

U2 - 10.1007/s10865-011-9351-7

DO - 10.1007/s10865-011-9351-7

M3 - Article

VL - 35

SP - 95

EP - 102

JO - Journal of Behavioral Medicine

JF - Journal of Behavioral Medicine

SN - 0160-7715

IS - 1

ER -