Evolution of EU retail payments law

Agnieszka Janczuk

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

Abstract

This paper traces the evolution of EU payments law for retail payments, identifying four phases of its development. In spite of the EU’s founding principle of free movement of payments, the first two phases of EU payments law were characterized by negative integration and soft law measures with limited effects on the performance of cross-border payments. The introduction of the euro started the third phase of EU payments law in which the EU became more aggressive in its approach to regulating payments. Nevertheless, EU legislation was mainly aimed at triggering and supporting “voluntary self-regulation” by the banking industry. As a result, EU payments law acquired a hybrid character. The ensuing Single Euro Payments Area (“SEPA”) is composed of publicly- and privately-made rules which became mingled together into a single system. Finally, the fourth phase of the development of EU payments law has witnessed, on an unprecedented scale, EU public regulation colonizing areas that used to be in the private domain. It also marks a nuanced shift of objectives of EU payments law: integration is no longer the overarching objective but “regulation for competition” has surfaced as an equally important goal.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)858-876
Number of pages18
JournalEuropean Law Review
Volume40
Issue number6
Publication statusPublished - 2015

Fingerprint

EU
Law
Euro
regulation
self-regulation
banking
legislation
industry
performance

Cite this

Janczuk, A. (2015). Evolution of EU retail payments law. European Law Review, 40(6), 858-876.
Janczuk, Agnieszka. / Evolution of EU retail payments law. In: European Law Review. 2015 ; Vol. 40, No. 6. pp. 858-876.
@article{1fca92caaf8d4d9bafe6ac59e328e103,
title = "Evolution of EU retail payments law",
abstract = "This paper traces the evolution of EU payments law for retail payments, identifying four phases of its development. In spite of the EU’s founding principle of free movement of payments, the first two phases of EU payments law were characterized by negative integration and soft law measures with limited effects on the performance of cross-border payments. The introduction of the euro started the third phase of EU payments law in which the EU became more aggressive in its approach to regulating payments. Nevertheless, EU legislation was mainly aimed at triggering and supporting “voluntary self-regulation” by the banking industry. As a result, EU payments law acquired a hybrid character. The ensuing Single Euro Payments Area (“SEPA”) is composed of publicly- and privately-made rules which became mingled together into a single system. Finally, the fourth phase of the development of EU payments law has witnessed, on an unprecedented scale, EU public regulation colonizing areas that used to be in the private domain. It also marks a nuanced shift of objectives of EU payments law: integration is no longer the overarching objective but “regulation for competition” has surfaced as an equally important goal.",
author = "Agnieszka Janczuk",
year = "2015",
language = "English",
volume = "40",
pages = "858--876",
journal = "European Law Review",
issn = "0307-5400",
publisher = "Sweet and Maxwell Ltd.",
number = "6",

}

Janczuk, A 2015, 'Evolution of EU retail payments law', European Law Review, vol. 40, no. 6, pp. 858-876.

Evolution of EU retail payments law. / Janczuk, Agnieszka.

In: European Law Review, Vol. 40, No. 6, 2015, p. 858-876.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Evolution of EU retail payments law

AU - Janczuk, Agnieszka

PY - 2015

Y1 - 2015

N2 - This paper traces the evolution of EU payments law for retail payments, identifying four phases of its development. In spite of the EU’s founding principle of free movement of payments, the first two phases of EU payments law were characterized by negative integration and soft law measures with limited effects on the performance of cross-border payments. The introduction of the euro started the third phase of EU payments law in which the EU became more aggressive in its approach to regulating payments. Nevertheless, EU legislation was mainly aimed at triggering and supporting “voluntary self-regulation” by the banking industry. As a result, EU payments law acquired a hybrid character. The ensuing Single Euro Payments Area (“SEPA”) is composed of publicly- and privately-made rules which became mingled together into a single system. Finally, the fourth phase of the development of EU payments law has witnessed, on an unprecedented scale, EU public regulation colonizing areas that used to be in the private domain. It also marks a nuanced shift of objectives of EU payments law: integration is no longer the overarching objective but “regulation for competition” has surfaced as an equally important goal.

AB - This paper traces the evolution of EU payments law for retail payments, identifying four phases of its development. In spite of the EU’s founding principle of free movement of payments, the first two phases of EU payments law were characterized by negative integration and soft law measures with limited effects on the performance of cross-border payments. The introduction of the euro started the third phase of EU payments law in which the EU became more aggressive in its approach to regulating payments. Nevertheless, EU legislation was mainly aimed at triggering and supporting “voluntary self-regulation” by the banking industry. As a result, EU payments law acquired a hybrid character. The ensuing Single Euro Payments Area (“SEPA”) is composed of publicly- and privately-made rules which became mingled together into a single system. Finally, the fourth phase of the development of EU payments law has witnessed, on an unprecedented scale, EU public regulation colonizing areas that used to be in the private domain. It also marks a nuanced shift of objectives of EU payments law: integration is no longer the overarching objective but “regulation for competition” has surfaced as an equally important goal.

M3 - Article

VL - 40

SP - 858

EP - 876

JO - European Law Review

JF - European Law Review

SN - 0307-5400

IS - 6

ER -