Expertise affects aesthetic evolution: Evidence from artistic fieldwork and psychological experiments

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapterScientific

Abstract

An unmade bed. A cigarette glued to the wall. A replica of a soup can box. Drippings on a canvas. Can an evolutionary approach help us understand the production and appreciation of, sometimes perplexing, modern and contemporary art? This chapter attempts at this by investigating two hypotheses about the evolution of human aesthetics in the domain of art. The first hypothesis, commonly called evolutionary aesthetics, asserts that aesthetic preferences, such as those for particular faces, body shapes and animals, have evolved in our ancestors because they motivated adaptive behavior. Artworks (e.g., those depicting facial beauty) may exploit these ancestral aesthetic preferences. In contrast, the second hypothesis states that aesthetic preferences continuously coevolve with artworks, and that they are subject to learning from, especially prestigious, other individuals. We called this mechanism prestige driven coevolutionary aesthetics. Here I report artistic fieldwork and psychological experiments we conducted. We found that while exploitation of ancestral aesthetic preferences prevails among non-experts, prestige driven coevolutionary aesthetics dominates expert appreciation. I speculate that the latter mechanism can explain modern and contemporary art’s deviations from evolutionary aesthetics as well as the existence and persistence of its elusiveness. I also discuss the potential relevance of our findings to major fields studying aesthetics, that is, empirical aesthetics, and sociological and historical approaches to art.
LanguageEnglish
Title of host publicationExploring transdisciplinarity in art and sciences
EditorsZ. Kapoula, Z. Volle, J. Renoult, M. Andreatta
PublisherSpringer International
Chapter16
Pages303-326
Edition1
ISBN (Print)978-3-319-76054-4
Publication statusPublished - 2018

Fingerprint

Aesthetics
Psychological
Experiment
Expertise
Field Work
Art
Aesthetic Preference
Evolutionary
Artwork
Prestige
Canvas
Exploitation
Empirical Aesthetics
Animals
Ancestors
Persistence
Deviation

Cite this

Verpooten, J. (2018). Expertise affects aesthetic evolution: Evidence from artistic fieldwork and psychological experiments. In Z. Kapoula, Z. Volle, J. Renoult, & M. Andreatta (Eds.), Exploring transdisciplinarity in art and sciences (1 ed., pp. 303-326). Springer International.
Verpooten, Jan. / Expertise affects aesthetic evolution : Evidence from artistic fieldwork and psychological experiments. Exploring transdisciplinarity in art and sciences. editor / Z. Kapoula ; Z. Volle ; J. Renoult ; M. Andreatta. 1. ed. Springer International, 2018. pp. 303-326
@inbook{67bd1df0d96346589867b4987de98821,
title = "Expertise affects aesthetic evolution: Evidence from artistic fieldwork and psychological experiments",
abstract = "An unmade bed. A cigarette glued to the wall. A replica of a soup can box. Drippings on a canvas. Can an evolutionary approach help us understand the production and appreciation of, sometimes perplexing, modern and contemporary art? This chapter attempts at this by investigating two hypotheses about the evolution of human aesthetics in the domain of art. The first hypothesis, commonly called evolutionary aesthetics, asserts that aesthetic preferences, such as those for particular faces, body shapes and animals, have evolved in our ancestors because they motivated adaptive behavior. Artworks (e.g., those depicting facial beauty) may exploit these ancestral aesthetic preferences. In contrast, the second hypothesis states that aesthetic preferences continuously coevolve with artworks, and that they are subject to learning from, especially prestigious, other individuals. We called this mechanism prestige driven coevolutionary aesthetics. Here I report artistic fieldwork and psychological experiments we conducted. We found that while exploitation of ancestral aesthetic preferences prevails among non-experts, prestige driven coevolutionary aesthetics dominates expert appreciation. I speculate that the latter mechanism can explain modern and contemporary art’s deviations from evolutionary aesthetics as well as the existence and persistence of its elusiveness. I also discuss the potential relevance of our findings to major fields studying aesthetics, that is, empirical aesthetics, and sociological and historical approaches to art.",
author = "Jan Verpooten",
year = "2018",
language = "English",
isbn = "978-3-319-76054-4",
pages = "303--326",
editor = "Z. Kapoula and Z. Volle and J. Renoult and M. Andreatta",
booktitle = "Exploring transdisciplinarity in art and sciences",
publisher = "Springer International",
edition = "1",

}

Verpooten, J 2018, Expertise affects aesthetic evolution: Evidence from artistic fieldwork and psychological experiments. in Z Kapoula, Z Volle, J Renoult & M Andreatta (eds), Exploring transdisciplinarity in art and sciences. 1 edn, Springer International, pp. 303-326.

Expertise affects aesthetic evolution : Evidence from artistic fieldwork and psychological experiments. / Verpooten, Jan.

Exploring transdisciplinarity in art and sciences. ed. / Z. Kapoula; Z. Volle; J. Renoult; M. Andreatta. 1. ed. Springer International, 2018. p. 303-326.

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapterScientific

TY - CHAP

T1 - Expertise affects aesthetic evolution

T2 - Evidence from artistic fieldwork and psychological experiments

AU - Verpooten, Jan

PY - 2018

Y1 - 2018

N2 - An unmade bed. A cigarette glued to the wall. A replica of a soup can box. Drippings on a canvas. Can an evolutionary approach help us understand the production and appreciation of, sometimes perplexing, modern and contemporary art? This chapter attempts at this by investigating two hypotheses about the evolution of human aesthetics in the domain of art. The first hypothesis, commonly called evolutionary aesthetics, asserts that aesthetic preferences, such as those for particular faces, body shapes and animals, have evolved in our ancestors because they motivated adaptive behavior. Artworks (e.g., those depicting facial beauty) may exploit these ancestral aesthetic preferences. In contrast, the second hypothesis states that aesthetic preferences continuously coevolve with artworks, and that they are subject to learning from, especially prestigious, other individuals. We called this mechanism prestige driven coevolutionary aesthetics. Here I report artistic fieldwork and psychological experiments we conducted. We found that while exploitation of ancestral aesthetic preferences prevails among non-experts, prestige driven coevolutionary aesthetics dominates expert appreciation. I speculate that the latter mechanism can explain modern and contemporary art’s deviations from evolutionary aesthetics as well as the existence and persistence of its elusiveness. I also discuss the potential relevance of our findings to major fields studying aesthetics, that is, empirical aesthetics, and sociological and historical approaches to art.

AB - An unmade bed. A cigarette glued to the wall. A replica of a soup can box. Drippings on a canvas. Can an evolutionary approach help us understand the production and appreciation of, sometimes perplexing, modern and contemporary art? This chapter attempts at this by investigating two hypotheses about the evolution of human aesthetics in the domain of art. The first hypothesis, commonly called evolutionary aesthetics, asserts that aesthetic preferences, such as those for particular faces, body shapes and animals, have evolved in our ancestors because they motivated adaptive behavior. Artworks (e.g., those depicting facial beauty) may exploit these ancestral aesthetic preferences. In contrast, the second hypothesis states that aesthetic preferences continuously coevolve with artworks, and that they are subject to learning from, especially prestigious, other individuals. We called this mechanism prestige driven coevolutionary aesthetics. Here I report artistic fieldwork and psychological experiments we conducted. We found that while exploitation of ancestral aesthetic preferences prevails among non-experts, prestige driven coevolutionary aesthetics dominates expert appreciation. I speculate that the latter mechanism can explain modern and contemporary art’s deviations from evolutionary aesthetics as well as the existence and persistence of its elusiveness. I also discuss the potential relevance of our findings to major fields studying aesthetics, that is, empirical aesthetics, and sociological and historical approaches to art.

M3 - Chapter

SN - 978-3-319-76054-4

SP - 303

EP - 326

BT - Exploring transdisciplinarity in art and sciences

A2 - Kapoula, Z.

A2 - Volle, Z.

A2 - Renoult, J.

A2 - Andreatta, M.

PB - Springer International

ER -

Verpooten J. Expertise affects aesthetic evolution: Evidence from artistic fieldwork and psychological experiments. In Kapoula Z, Volle Z, Renoult J, Andreatta M, editors, Exploring transdisciplinarity in art and sciences. 1 ed. Springer International. 2018. p. 303-326