Explaining online ambassadorship behaviors on Facebook and LinkedIn

Ward van Zoonen*, Jos Bartels, Anne-Marie van Prooijen, Alexander P. Schouten

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

Abstract

Due to technological advancement work is situated within a broader network where work communiques become public and observable by anyone at any time. This study draws on identity theory and boundary management preferences to examine the extent to which employees use their Facebook and LinkedIn accounts to share updates about their organization. This study reports on a two-wave panel study among Dutch employees (N = 515). Drawing on boundary theory and organizational citizenship literature this study shows that self enhancement motives are important predictors for ambassadorship behaviors on Facebook and LinkedIn. Conversely, segmentation preferences and identification processes significantly affect ambassadorship behaviors on Facebook, but not on Linkedln. Hence, social media afford similar behaviors across platforms but the antecedents may differ across social media platforms.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)354-362
Number of pages9
JournalComputers in Human Behavior
Volume87
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Oct 2018

Keywords

  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • Boundary preferences
  • Organizational identification
  • Organizational ambassadorship
  • Self-enhancement
  • SOCIAL NETWORKING SITES
  • STRATEGIC SELF-PRESENTATION
  • WORK-HOME SEGMENTATION
  • ORGANIZATIONAL IDENTIFICATION
  • IMPRESSION MANAGEMENT
  • MEDIA USE
  • JOB-SATISFACTION
  • ENHANCEMENT
  • COMMITMENT
  • TWITTER

Cite this

@article{858aa3bc310d4441b2296fe6cbab4b14,
title = "Explaining online ambassadorship behaviors on Facebook and LinkedIn",
abstract = "Due to technological advancement work is situated within a broader network where work communiques become public and observable by anyone at any time. This study draws on identity theory and boundary management preferences to examine the extent to which employees use their Facebook and LinkedIn accounts to share updates about their organization. This study reports on a two-wave panel study among Dutch employees (N = 515). Drawing on boundary theory and organizational citizenship literature this study shows that self enhancement motives are important predictors for ambassadorship behaviors on Facebook and LinkedIn. Conversely, segmentation preferences and identification processes significantly affect ambassadorship behaviors on Facebook, but not on Linkedln. Hence, social media afford similar behaviors across platforms but the antecedents may differ across social media platforms.",
keywords = "Facebook, LinkedIn, Boundary preferences, Organizational identification, Organizational ambassadorship, Self-enhancement, SOCIAL NETWORKING SITES, STRATEGIC SELF-PRESENTATION, WORK-HOME SEGMENTATION, ORGANIZATIONAL IDENTIFICATION, IMPRESSION MANAGEMENT, MEDIA USE, JOB-SATISFACTION, ENHANCEMENT, COMMITMENT, TWITTER",
author = "{van Zoonen}, Ward and Jos Bartels and {van Prooijen}, Anne-Marie and Schouten, {Alexander P.}",
year = "2018",
month = "10",
doi = "10.1016/j.chb.2018.05.031",
language = "English",
volume = "87",
pages = "354--362",
journal = "Computers in Human Behavior",
issn = "0747-5632",
publisher = "PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD",

}

Explaining online ambassadorship behaviors on Facebook and LinkedIn. / van Zoonen, Ward; Bartels, Jos; van Prooijen, Anne-Marie; Schouten, Alexander P.

In: Computers in Human Behavior, Vol. 87, 10.2018, p. 354-362.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Explaining online ambassadorship behaviors on Facebook and LinkedIn

AU - van Zoonen, Ward

AU - Bartels, Jos

AU - van Prooijen, Anne-Marie

AU - Schouten, Alexander P.

PY - 2018/10

Y1 - 2018/10

N2 - Due to technological advancement work is situated within a broader network where work communiques become public and observable by anyone at any time. This study draws on identity theory and boundary management preferences to examine the extent to which employees use their Facebook and LinkedIn accounts to share updates about their organization. This study reports on a two-wave panel study among Dutch employees (N = 515). Drawing on boundary theory and organizational citizenship literature this study shows that self enhancement motives are important predictors for ambassadorship behaviors on Facebook and LinkedIn. Conversely, segmentation preferences and identification processes significantly affect ambassadorship behaviors on Facebook, but not on Linkedln. Hence, social media afford similar behaviors across platforms but the antecedents may differ across social media platforms.

AB - Due to technological advancement work is situated within a broader network where work communiques become public and observable by anyone at any time. This study draws on identity theory and boundary management preferences to examine the extent to which employees use their Facebook and LinkedIn accounts to share updates about their organization. This study reports on a two-wave panel study among Dutch employees (N = 515). Drawing on boundary theory and organizational citizenship literature this study shows that self enhancement motives are important predictors for ambassadorship behaviors on Facebook and LinkedIn. Conversely, segmentation preferences and identification processes significantly affect ambassadorship behaviors on Facebook, but not on Linkedln. Hence, social media afford similar behaviors across platforms but the antecedents may differ across social media platforms.

KW - Facebook

KW - LinkedIn

KW - Boundary preferences

KW - Organizational identification

KW - Organizational ambassadorship

KW - Self-enhancement

KW - SOCIAL NETWORKING SITES

KW - STRATEGIC SELF-PRESENTATION

KW - WORK-HOME SEGMENTATION

KW - ORGANIZATIONAL IDENTIFICATION

KW - IMPRESSION MANAGEMENT

KW - MEDIA USE

KW - JOB-SATISFACTION

KW - ENHANCEMENT

KW - COMMITMENT

KW - TWITTER

U2 - 10.1016/j.chb.2018.05.031

DO - 10.1016/j.chb.2018.05.031

M3 - Article

VL - 87

SP - 354

EP - 362

JO - Computers in Human Behavior

JF - Computers in Human Behavior

SN - 0747-5632

ER -