Explanatory justice: The case of disjunctive explanations

Michael Cohen*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Recent years have witnessed an effort to explicate the concept of explanatory power in a Bayesian framework by constructing explanatory measures. It has been argued that those measures should not violate the principle of explanatory justice, which states that explanatory power cannot be extended “for free.” I argue, by formal means, that one recent measure claiming to be immune from explanatory injustice fails to be so. I end by concluding that the explanatory justice criticism can be dissolved, given a natural interpretation of the concept of negative explanatory power.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)442-454
Number of pages13
JournalPhilosophy of Science
Volume85
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jul 2018
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Explanatory Power
  • Bayesian Framework
  • Explanatory Justice

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Explanatory justice: The case of disjunctive explanations'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this