Externalizing Europe’s energy policy in EU free trade agreements

A cognitive dissonance between promoting sustainable development and ensuring security of supply

Anna Marhold

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

    Abstract

    It is no secret that while the European Union (EU) has taken up commitments to combat climate change under the UNFCCC Paris Agreement and its own 2020 and 2030 climate and energy package strategy, the Union continues to be heavily dependent on the import of fossil fuels from abroad. One may even say that this leads to a cognitive dissonance, i.e. the discomfort which ensues if one holds two contradictory values, with respect to the externalization of the Union’s energy and sustainable development policy.
    One the one hand, the EU aims to become a global frontrunner in the field of promoting renewable energy and sustainable development. This expresses itself through the inclusion of specific chapters on trade and sustainable development in the EU’s Free Trade Agreements (FTAs) (standard since the 2011 EU-South Korea FTA). On the other, the EU realises that it is imperative to secure the Union’s security of energy supply, still largely guaranteed by fossil fuels. Therefore, the Union in parallel attempts to eliminate discriminatory practices in international fossil fuel trade in its bilateral agreements (e.g. in the EU-Ukraine DCFTA).
    This paper will explore the root causes of these dilemmas and research what elements could contribute to ensuring more uniformity in a more holistic EU external energy policy. The objectives of sustainable development and security of supply are not necessarily contradictory per sé. However, clearer delineations between the two objectives and a more holistic approach in this policy area are necessary in EU external relations in general, and in the Union’s FTAs more specifically. This also applies to relations between Members States and the Union in this area, as well as to the interactions between the relevant EU institutions tasked with energy, sustainable development and the environment.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)1-30
    Number of pages30
    JournalEurope and the World: A Law Review
    Publication statusSubmitted - 6 Jun 2018

    Fingerprint

    cognitive dissonance
    energy policy
    free trade
    sustainable development
    supply
    energy
    energy supply
    policy area
    holistic approach
    renewable energy
    Ukraine
    South Korea
    development policy
    import
    climate change
    EU
    inclusion
    climate
    commitment
    cause

    Cite this

    @article{0a063abd68184820a725ad65332a2509,
    title = "Externalizing Europe’s energy policy in EU free trade agreements: A cognitive dissonance between promoting sustainable development and ensuring security of supply",
    abstract = "It is no secret that while the European Union (EU) has taken up commitments to combat climate change under the UNFCCC Paris Agreement and its own 2020 and 2030 climate and energy package strategy, the Union continues to be heavily dependent on the import of fossil fuels from abroad. One may even say that this leads to a cognitive dissonance, i.e. the discomfort which ensues if one holds two contradictory values, with respect to the externalization of the Union’s energy and sustainable development policy.One the one hand, the EU aims to become a global frontrunner in the field of promoting renewable energy and sustainable development. This expresses itself through the inclusion of specific chapters on trade and sustainable development in the EU’s Free Trade Agreements (FTAs) (standard since the 2011 EU-South Korea FTA). On the other, the EU realises that it is imperative to secure the Union’s security of energy supply, still largely guaranteed by fossil fuels. Therefore, the Union in parallel attempts to eliminate discriminatory practices in international fossil fuel trade in its bilateral agreements (e.g. in the EU-Ukraine DCFTA). This paper will explore the root causes of these dilemmas and research what elements could contribute to ensuring more uniformity in a more holistic EU external energy policy. The objectives of sustainable development and security of supply are not necessarily contradictory per s{\'e}. However, clearer delineations between the two objectives and a more holistic approach in this policy area are necessary in EU external relations in general, and in the Union’s FTAs more specifically. This also applies to relations between Members States and the Union in this area, as well as to the interactions between the relevant EU institutions tasked with energy, sustainable development and the environment.",
    author = "Anna Marhold",
    year = "2018",
    month = "6",
    day = "6",
    language = "English",
    pages = "1--30",
    journal = "Europe and the World: A Law Review",
    issn = "2399-2875",

    }

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - Externalizing Europe’s energy policy in EU free trade agreements

    T2 - A cognitive dissonance between promoting sustainable development and ensuring security of supply

    AU - Marhold, Anna

    PY - 2018/6/6

    Y1 - 2018/6/6

    N2 - It is no secret that while the European Union (EU) has taken up commitments to combat climate change under the UNFCCC Paris Agreement and its own 2020 and 2030 climate and energy package strategy, the Union continues to be heavily dependent on the import of fossil fuels from abroad. One may even say that this leads to a cognitive dissonance, i.e. the discomfort which ensues if one holds two contradictory values, with respect to the externalization of the Union’s energy and sustainable development policy.One the one hand, the EU aims to become a global frontrunner in the field of promoting renewable energy and sustainable development. This expresses itself through the inclusion of specific chapters on trade and sustainable development in the EU’s Free Trade Agreements (FTAs) (standard since the 2011 EU-South Korea FTA). On the other, the EU realises that it is imperative to secure the Union’s security of energy supply, still largely guaranteed by fossil fuels. Therefore, the Union in parallel attempts to eliminate discriminatory practices in international fossil fuel trade in its bilateral agreements (e.g. in the EU-Ukraine DCFTA). This paper will explore the root causes of these dilemmas and research what elements could contribute to ensuring more uniformity in a more holistic EU external energy policy. The objectives of sustainable development and security of supply are not necessarily contradictory per sé. However, clearer delineations between the two objectives and a more holistic approach in this policy area are necessary in EU external relations in general, and in the Union’s FTAs more specifically. This also applies to relations between Members States and the Union in this area, as well as to the interactions between the relevant EU institutions tasked with energy, sustainable development and the environment.

    AB - It is no secret that while the European Union (EU) has taken up commitments to combat climate change under the UNFCCC Paris Agreement and its own 2020 and 2030 climate and energy package strategy, the Union continues to be heavily dependent on the import of fossil fuels from abroad. One may even say that this leads to a cognitive dissonance, i.e. the discomfort which ensues if one holds two contradictory values, with respect to the externalization of the Union’s energy and sustainable development policy.One the one hand, the EU aims to become a global frontrunner in the field of promoting renewable energy and sustainable development. This expresses itself through the inclusion of specific chapters on trade and sustainable development in the EU’s Free Trade Agreements (FTAs) (standard since the 2011 EU-South Korea FTA). On the other, the EU realises that it is imperative to secure the Union’s security of energy supply, still largely guaranteed by fossil fuels. Therefore, the Union in parallel attempts to eliminate discriminatory practices in international fossil fuel trade in its bilateral agreements (e.g. in the EU-Ukraine DCFTA). This paper will explore the root causes of these dilemmas and research what elements could contribute to ensuring more uniformity in a more holistic EU external energy policy. The objectives of sustainable development and security of supply are not necessarily contradictory per sé. However, clearer delineations between the two objectives and a more holistic approach in this policy area are necessary in EU external relations in general, and in the Union’s FTAs more specifically. This also applies to relations between Members States and the Union in this area, as well as to the interactions between the relevant EU institutions tasked with energy, sustainable development and the environment.

    M3 - Article

    SP - 1

    EP - 30

    JO - Europe and the World: A Law Review

    JF - Europe and the World: A Law Review

    SN - 2399-2875

    ER -