Extremism reduces conflict arousal and increases values affirmation in response to meaning violations

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

Abstract

In the social psychological threat-compensation literature, there is an apparent contradiction whereby relatively extreme beliefs both decrease markers of physiological arousal following meaning violations, and increase the values affirmation behaviors understood as a palliative responses to this arousal. We hypothesize that this is due to the differential impact of measuring extremism on behavioral inhibition and approach systems following meaning violations, whereby extremism both reduces markers of conflict arousal (BIS) and increases values affirmation (BAS) unrelated to this initial arousal. Using pupil dilation as a proxy for immediate conflict arousal, we found that the same meaning violation (anomalous playing cards) evoked greater pupil dilation, and that this pupillary reaction was diminished in participants who earlier reported extreme beliefs. We also found that reporting extreme beliefs was associated with greater affirmation of an unrelated meaning framework, where this affirmation was unrelated to physiological markers of conflict arousal.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)126–131
JournalBiological Psychology
Volume108
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2015

Fingerprint

Dilatation
Proxy
Conflict (Psychology)

Cite this

@article{11bef65bdf4941b7bae3b441bade2f87,
title = "Extremism reduces conflict arousal and increases values affirmation in response to meaning violations",
abstract = "In the social psychological threat-compensation literature, there is an apparent contradiction whereby relatively extreme beliefs both decrease markers of physiological arousal following meaning violations, and increase the values affirmation behaviors understood as a palliative responses to this arousal. We hypothesize that this is due to the differential impact of measuring extremism on behavioral inhibition and approach systems following meaning violations, whereby extremism both reduces markers of conflict arousal (BIS) and increases values affirmation (BAS) unrelated to this initial arousal. Using pupil dilation as a proxy for immediate conflict arousal, we found that the same meaning violation (anomalous playing cards) evoked greater pupil dilation, and that this pupillary reaction was diminished in participants who earlier reported extreme beliefs. We also found that reporting extreme beliefs was associated with greater affirmation of an unrelated meaning framework, where this affirmation was unrelated to physiological markers of conflict arousal.",
author = "W.W.A. Sleegers and T. Proulx and {van Beest}, I.",
year = "2015",
doi = "10.1016/j.biopsycho.2015.03.012",
language = "English",
volume = "108",
pages = "126–131",
journal = "Biological Psychology",
issn = "0301-0511",
publisher = "Elsevier Science BV",

}

Extremism reduces conflict arousal and increases values affirmation in response to meaning violations. / Sleegers, W.W.A.; Proulx, T.; van Beest, I.

In: Biological Psychology, Vol. 108, 2015, p. 126–131.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Extremism reduces conflict arousal and increases values affirmation in response to meaning violations

AU - Sleegers, W.W.A.

AU - Proulx, T.

AU - van Beest, I.

PY - 2015

Y1 - 2015

N2 - In the social psychological threat-compensation literature, there is an apparent contradiction whereby relatively extreme beliefs both decrease markers of physiological arousal following meaning violations, and increase the values affirmation behaviors understood as a palliative responses to this arousal. We hypothesize that this is due to the differential impact of measuring extremism on behavioral inhibition and approach systems following meaning violations, whereby extremism both reduces markers of conflict arousal (BIS) and increases values affirmation (BAS) unrelated to this initial arousal. Using pupil dilation as a proxy for immediate conflict arousal, we found that the same meaning violation (anomalous playing cards) evoked greater pupil dilation, and that this pupillary reaction was diminished in participants who earlier reported extreme beliefs. We also found that reporting extreme beliefs was associated with greater affirmation of an unrelated meaning framework, where this affirmation was unrelated to physiological markers of conflict arousal.

AB - In the social psychological threat-compensation literature, there is an apparent contradiction whereby relatively extreme beliefs both decrease markers of physiological arousal following meaning violations, and increase the values affirmation behaviors understood as a palliative responses to this arousal. We hypothesize that this is due to the differential impact of measuring extremism on behavioral inhibition and approach systems following meaning violations, whereby extremism both reduces markers of conflict arousal (BIS) and increases values affirmation (BAS) unrelated to this initial arousal. Using pupil dilation as a proxy for immediate conflict arousal, we found that the same meaning violation (anomalous playing cards) evoked greater pupil dilation, and that this pupillary reaction was diminished in participants who earlier reported extreme beliefs. We also found that reporting extreme beliefs was associated with greater affirmation of an unrelated meaning framework, where this affirmation was unrelated to physiological markers of conflict arousal.

UR - http://hdl.handle.net/10411/20645

U2 - 10.1016/j.biopsycho.2015.03.012

DO - 10.1016/j.biopsycho.2015.03.012

M3 - Article

VL - 108

SP - 126

EP - 131

JO - Biological Psychology

JF - Biological Psychology

SN - 0301-0511

ER -