Fairness matters when responding to disasters: An experimental study of government legitimacy

Honorata Mazepus*, Florian van Leeuwen

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Governments worldwide are regularly faced with severe weather conditions and disasters caused by natural hazards. Does the way in which governments respond to disasters affect their legitimacy? The current study investigated how evaluations of authorities were influenced by four aspects of a governmental response to a hypothetical disaster. In a survey experiment participants read a scenario in which a government distributed aid in the aftermath of a flooding. Data were collected from the Netherlands, France, Poland, Ukraine, and Russia (N = 2,677). Results showed that the government was seen as more legitimate when it was described as distributing resources fairly, following fair procedures, and providing a material benefit to the participant. However, in contrast to predictions derived from system‐justification theory, results showed that outcome dependence was associated with reduced legitimacy. These findings suggest that response policies that address both instrumental and fairness concerns might help maintain positive evaluations of governments.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)621-637
JournalGovernance: An International Journal of Policy and Administration
Volume33
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2020

Keywords

  • BLAME
  • GENERATE
  • INSTITUTIONAL LEGITIMACY
  • NATURAL DISASTER
  • PROCEDURAL JUSTICE
  • SATISFACTION
  • SOCIAL-JUSTICE
  • SYSTEM JUSTIFICATION
  • VOICE

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Fairness matters when responding to disasters: An experimental study of government legitimacy'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this