Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Fidelity and clinical competence in providing illness management and recovery: An explorative study

  • B-J. Roosenschoon*
  • , J. van Weeghel
  • , M.L. Deen
  • , E.W. Van Esveld
  • , A.M. Kamperman
  • , C. L. Mulder
  • *Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

66 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Illness Management and Recovery (IMR) is a psychosocial intervention supporting people with serious mental illnesses. In this study, 15 IMR groups were assessed for fidelity and clinician competency to establish the implementation level of all IMR elements and explore complementarity of the IMR Treatment Integrity Scale (IT-IS) to the standard IMR Fidelity Scale. Use of the IT-IS was adapted, similar to the IMR Fidelity Scale. Descriptive statistics were applied. Implementation success of IMR elements varied widely on the IMR Fidelity Scale and IT-IS (M = 3.94, SD = 1.13, and M = 3.29, SD = 1.05, respectively). Twelve IMR elements (60%) were well-implemented, whereas eight (40%) were implemented insufficiently, including some critical cognitive-behavioral techniques (e.g., role-playing). The scales appeared largely complementary, though strongly correlated (r (13) = 0.74, p = 0.002). Providing all IMR elements adequately requires a variety of clinical skills. Specific additional training and supervision may be necessary.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1508-1520
JournalCommunity Mental Health Journal
Volume59
Issue number8
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2023

Keywords

  • illness management and recovery
  • severe mental illness
  • psychosocial treatment
  • self-management
  • fidelity
  • recovery

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Fidelity and clinical competence in providing illness management and recovery: An explorative study'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this