Field validity of the HCR-20 in forensic medium security units in Flanders

Inge Jeandarme, Claudia Pouls, Jan De Laender, T. I. Oei, S. Bogaerts

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

Abstract

Structured risk assessment has become a part of routine practice in forensic settings. However, little attention has been paid to the clinical applicability of existing tools. The present research focused on the performance of the Historical Clinical Risk Management-20 (HCR-20) – one of the most commonly used tools for structured professional judgment – in the daily practice of three medium security units in Flanders. Areas under the curve for the prediction of violent recidivism during (N = 168) and after (N = 105) medium security treatment were non-significant. In addition, analyses showed that the HCR-20 was mainly of interest in identifying low-risk individuals. Further research measuring different aspects of predictive validity in applied settings is recommended.
Keywords: Risk assessment, structured professional judgment, HCR-20, forensic psychiatry, field validity
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)305-322
JournalPsychology Crime & Law
Volume23
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 21 Apr 2017

Fingerprint

risk management
risk assessment
psychiatry
Area Under Curve
performance

Cite this

Jeandarme, Inge ; Pouls, Claudia ; De Laender, Jan ; Oei, T. I. ; Bogaerts, S. / Field validity of the HCR-20 in forensic medium security units in Flanders. In: Psychology Crime & Law. 2017 ; Vol. 23, No. 4. pp. 305-322.
@article{d04275e0981f4988b342bf9244f4a8fa,
title = "Field validity of the HCR-20 in forensic medium security units in Flanders",
abstract = "Structured risk assessment has become a part of routine practice in forensic settings. However, little attention has been paid to the clinical applicability of existing tools. The present research focused on the performance of the Historical Clinical Risk Management-20 (HCR-20) – one of the most commonly used tools for structured professional judgment – in the daily practice of three medium security units in Flanders. Areas under the curve for the prediction of violent recidivism during (N = 168) and after (N = 105) medium security treatment were non-significant. In addition, analyses showed that the HCR-20 was mainly of interest in identifying low-risk individuals. Further research measuring different aspects of predictive validity in applied settings is recommended.Keywords: Risk assessment, structured professional judgment, HCR-20, forensic psychiatry, field validity",
author = "Inge Jeandarme and Claudia Pouls and {De Laender}, Jan and Oei, {T. I.} and S. Bogaerts",
year = "2017",
month = "4",
day = "21",
doi = "10.1080/1068316X.2016.1258467",
language = "English",
volume = "23",
pages = "305--322",
journal = "Psychology Crime & Law",
issn = "1068-316X",
publisher = "Routledge",
number = "4",

}

Field validity of the HCR-20 in forensic medium security units in Flanders. / Jeandarme, Inge; Pouls, Claudia; De Laender, Jan; Oei, T. I.; Bogaerts, S.

In: Psychology Crime & Law, Vol. 23, No. 4, 21.04.2017, p. 305-322.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Field validity of the HCR-20 in forensic medium security units in Flanders

AU - Jeandarme, Inge

AU - Pouls, Claudia

AU - De Laender, Jan

AU - Oei, T. I.

AU - Bogaerts, S.

PY - 2017/4/21

Y1 - 2017/4/21

N2 - Structured risk assessment has become a part of routine practice in forensic settings. However, little attention has been paid to the clinical applicability of existing tools. The present research focused on the performance of the Historical Clinical Risk Management-20 (HCR-20) – one of the most commonly used tools for structured professional judgment – in the daily practice of three medium security units in Flanders. Areas under the curve for the prediction of violent recidivism during (N = 168) and after (N = 105) medium security treatment were non-significant. In addition, analyses showed that the HCR-20 was mainly of interest in identifying low-risk individuals. Further research measuring different aspects of predictive validity in applied settings is recommended.Keywords: Risk assessment, structured professional judgment, HCR-20, forensic psychiatry, field validity

AB - Structured risk assessment has become a part of routine practice in forensic settings. However, little attention has been paid to the clinical applicability of existing tools. The present research focused on the performance of the Historical Clinical Risk Management-20 (HCR-20) – one of the most commonly used tools for structured professional judgment – in the daily practice of three medium security units in Flanders. Areas under the curve for the prediction of violent recidivism during (N = 168) and after (N = 105) medium security treatment were non-significant. In addition, analyses showed that the HCR-20 was mainly of interest in identifying low-risk individuals. Further research measuring different aspects of predictive validity in applied settings is recommended.Keywords: Risk assessment, structured professional judgment, HCR-20, forensic psychiatry, field validity

U2 - 10.1080/1068316X.2016.1258467

DO - 10.1080/1068316X.2016.1258467

M3 - Article

VL - 23

SP - 305

EP - 322

JO - Psychology Crime & Law

JF - Psychology Crime & Law

SN - 1068-316X

IS - 4

ER -