Abstract
We develop a model where institutions form connections through swaps of projects in order to diversify their individual risk. These connections lead to two different network structures. In a clustered network groups of financial institutions hold identical portfolios and default together. In an unclustered network defaults are more dispersed. With long term finance welfare is the same in both networks. In contrast, when short term finance is used, the network structure matters. Upon the arrival of a signal about banks’ future defaults, investors update their expectations of bank solvency. If their expectations are low, they do not roll over the debt and there is systemic risk in that all institutions are early liquidated. We compare investors’ rollover decisions and welfare in the two networks.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Place of Publication | Tilburg |
| Publisher | EBC |
| Number of pages | 43 |
| Volume | 2010-23S |
| Publication status | Published - 2010 |
Publication series
| Name | EBC Discussion Paper |
|---|---|
| Volume | 2010-23S |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 1 No Poverty
-
SDG 8 Decent Work and Economic Growth
-
SDG 10 Reduced Inequalities
Keywords
- Financial networks
- diversification
- short term finance
- rollover risk
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Financial Connections and Systemic Risk'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver