Five Reinforcement Sensitivity Theory (RST) of personality questionnaires

Comparison, validity and generalization

D. Krupić, P.J. Corr, S. Ručević, V. Križanić, A. Gracanin

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

Abstract

There are six purpose-built Reinforcement Sensitivity Theory (RST) personality questionnaires currently in use to measure the fight-flight-freeze system (FFFS), the behavioural inhibition system (BIS), and the behavioural approach system (BAS). They differ in their conceptualizations and operational constructs, and this poses a problem for their differential validity and the generalizability of results, and comparison of results from different studies. This paper examined the psychometric properties of five of these RST questionnaires, with a total sample of 821 participants, taken from the factor structures for the Croatian translations of BIS/BAS scales, SPSRQ, Jackson-5, RSQ and RST-PQ. Data were analysed by correlational and confirmatory factor analyses. We found some of these questionnaires achieved marginal to adequate fit indices, and they showed ambiguity in terms of convergent validity for all three general behavioural systems. These findings highlight the difficulties with generalization and comparison of results with the use of different RST questionnaires. Based on these findings, as well as the ongoing debate concerning how best to measure RST constructs, we provide information on how to interpret results from the studies conducted with different RST scales.
Keywords: Reinforcement sensitivity theory, Exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis, Generalizability
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)19–24
JournalPersonality and Individual Differences
Volume97
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2016

Fingerprint

Statistical Factor Analysis
Surveys and Questionnaires

Cite this

Krupić, D. ; Corr, P.J. ; Ručević, S. ; Križanić, V. ; Gracanin, A. / Five Reinforcement Sensitivity Theory (RST) of personality questionnaires : Comparison, validity and generalization. In: Personality and Individual Differences. 2016 ; Vol. 97. pp. 19–24.
@article{afbe27b63b4f4b96af0298c5d3971a52,
title = "Five Reinforcement Sensitivity Theory (RST) of personality questionnaires: Comparison, validity and generalization",
abstract = "There are six purpose-built Reinforcement Sensitivity Theory (RST) personality questionnaires currently in use to measure the fight-flight-freeze system (FFFS), the behavioural inhibition system (BIS), and the behavioural approach system (BAS). They differ in their conceptualizations and operational constructs, and this poses a problem for their differential validity and the generalizability of results, and comparison of results from different studies. This paper examined the psychometric properties of five of these RST questionnaires, with a total sample of 821 participants, taken from the factor structures for the Croatian translations of BIS/BAS scales, SPSRQ, Jackson-5, RSQ and RST-PQ. Data were analysed by correlational and confirmatory factor analyses. We found some of these questionnaires achieved marginal to adequate fit indices, and they showed ambiguity in terms of convergent validity for all three general behavioural systems. These findings highlight the difficulties with generalization and comparison of results with the use of different RST questionnaires. Based on these findings, as well as the ongoing debate concerning how best to measure RST constructs, we provide information on how to interpret results from the studies conducted with different RST scales.Keywords: Reinforcement sensitivity theory, Exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis, Generalizability",
author = "D. Krupić and P.J. Corr and S. Ručević and V. Križanić and A. Gracanin",
note = "Affiliatie: Department of Psychology, Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences, University of Rijeka, Croatia",
year = "2016",
doi = "10.1016/j.paid.2016.03.012",
language = "English",
volume = "97",
pages = "19–24",
journal = "Personality and Individual Differences",
issn = "0191-8869",
publisher = "PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD",

}

Five Reinforcement Sensitivity Theory (RST) of personality questionnaires : Comparison, validity and generalization. / Krupić, D.; Corr, P.J.; Ručević, S.; Križanić, V.; Gracanin, A.

In: Personality and Individual Differences, Vol. 97, 2016, p. 19–24.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Five Reinforcement Sensitivity Theory (RST) of personality questionnaires

T2 - Comparison, validity and generalization

AU - Krupić, D.

AU - Corr, P.J.

AU - Ručević, S.

AU - Križanić, V.

AU - Gracanin, A.

N1 - Affiliatie: Department of Psychology, Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences, University of Rijeka, Croatia

PY - 2016

Y1 - 2016

N2 - There are six purpose-built Reinforcement Sensitivity Theory (RST) personality questionnaires currently in use to measure the fight-flight-freeze system (FFFS), the behavioural inhibition system (BIS), and the behavioural approach system (BAS). They differ in their conceptualizations and operational constructs, and this poses a problem for their differential validity and the generalizability of results, and comparison of results from different studies. This paper examined the psychometric properties of five of these RST questionnaires, with a total sample of 821 participants, taken from the factor structures for the Croatian translations of BIS/BAS scales, SPSRQ, Jackson-5, RSQ and RST-PQ. Data were analysed by correlational and confirmatory factor analyses. We found some of these questionnaires achieved marginal to adequate fit indices, and they showed ambiguity in terms of convergent validity for all three general behavioural systems. These findings highlight the difficulties with generalization and comparison of results with the use of different RST questionnaires. Based on these findings, as well as the ongoing debate concerning how best to measure RST constructs, we provide information on how to interpret results from the studies conducted with different RST scales.Keywords: Reinforcement sensitivity theory, Exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis, Generalizability

AB - There are six purpose-built Reinforcement Sensitivity Theory (RST) personality questionnaires currently in use to measure the fight-flight-freeze system (FFFS), the behavioural inhibition system (BIS), and the behavioural approach system (BAS). They differ in their conceptualizations and operational constructs, and this poses a problem for their differential validity and the generalizability of results, and comparison of results from different studies. This paper examined the psychometric properties of five of these RST questionnaires, with a total sample of 821 participants, taken from the factor structures for the Croatian translations of BIS/BAS scales, SPSRQ, Jackson-5, RSQ and RST-PQ. Data were analysed by correlational and confirmatory factor analyses. We found some of these questionnaires achieved marginal to adequate fit indices, and they showed ambiguity in terms of convergent validity for all three general behavioural systems. These findings highlight the difficulties with generalization and comparison of results with the use of different RST questionnaires. Based on these findings, as well as the ongoing debate concerning how best to measure RST constructs, we provide information on how to interpret results from the studies conducted with different RST scales.Keywords: Reinforcement sensitivity theory, Exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis, Generalizability

U2 - 10.1016/j.paid.2016.03.012

DO - 10.1016/j.paid.2016.03.012

M3 - Article

VL - 97

SP - 19

EP - 24

JO - Personality and Individual Differences

JF - Personality and Individual Differences

SN - 0191-8869

ER -