Abstract
This article responds to and develops the fragmented literature exploring intermediation in public administration
and urban governance. It uses Q-methodology to provide a systematic comparative empirical analysis of practitioners
who are perceived as making a difference in urban neighborhoods. Through this analysis, an original set of five
profiles of practitioners—enduring, struggling, facilitating, organizing, and trailblazing—is identified and compared.
This research challenges and advances the existing literature by emphasizing the multiplicity, complexity, and hybridity,
rather than the singularity, of individuals perceived as making a difference, arguing that different practitioners make
a difference in different ways. The authors set out a research agenda, overlooked in current theorization, that focuses
on the relationships and transitions between the five profiles and the conditions that inform them, opening up new
avenues for understanding and supporting practice.
and urban governance. It uses Q-methodology to provide a systematic comparative empirical analysis of practitioners
who are perceived as making a difference in urban neighborhoods. Through this analysis, an original set of five
profiles of practitioners—enduring, struggling, facilitating, organizing, and trailblazing—is identified and compared.
This research challenges and advances the existing literature by emphasizing the multiplicity, complexity, and hybridity,
rather than the singularity, of individuals perceived as making a difference, arguing that different practitioners make
a difference in different ways. The authors set out a research agenda, overlooked in current theorization, that focuses
on the relationships and transitions between the five profiles and the conditions that inform them, opening up new
avenues for understanding and supporting practice.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Article number | DOI: 10.1111/puar.12502 |
Pages (from-to) | 576-586 |
Number of pages | 11 |
Journal | Public Administration Review |
Volume | 76 |
Issue number | 4 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - Jul 2016 |