Flexibility stigma across Europe: How national contexts can shift the extent to which flexible workers are stigmatised

H. Chung*, H. Seo

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

33 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Although flexible working has expanded rapidly, especially during the pandemic, biased views against flexible workers – namely, flexibility stigma - are still prevalent and returning. Flexibility stigma hinders worker’s take up of flexible working arrangements and can make flexible working arrangements result in negative outcomes for worker’s well-being and productivity. This study examines how national cultural and policy contexts shape flexibility stigma levels within a country. We use a multilevel approach using the Eurobarometer dataset of 2018, covering 28 European countries, matched with national level aggregate data on policy and culture. Results show that in countries with a more work-life balance work culture and egalitarian gender norms, we see less prevalence of flexibility stigma. Similarly, in countries with generous family-friendly policies, workers are less likely to have negative perception towards flexible working. Finally, stronger bargaining positions of workers, may it be through stronger union power or through better labour market conditions, helps remove stigmatised views around workers who use flexible working arrangements. This study evidences the importance of contexts that shape views around flexible working, to help us better understand policy changes needed to ensure better flexible working practices.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)945-965
Number of pages21
JournalSocial Indicators Research
Volume174
Early online date2024
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2024

Keywords

  • Cross-national variation
  • Culture
  • Europe
  • Flexible working
  • Policies
  • Stigma

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Flexibility stigma across Europe: How national contexts can shift the extent to which flexible workers are stigmatised'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this