Forensic psychiatric treatment evaluation: The Clinical evaluation of treatment progress with multiple forensic routine outcome monitoring measures

F. van der Veeken*, J. Lucieer, Stefan Bogaerts

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

Abstract

The likelihood of recidivism is considered to be the most important outcome measure in forensic psychiatry. Therefore, forensic psychiatric treatment focuses on the reduction of the risk of recidivism by treating dynamic risk and protective factors, aiming to reduce risk factors while enhancing protective factors during treatment.

The goal of this study is to assess treatment progress with the Instrument for Forensic Treatment Evaluation (IFTE) in a Dutch forensic psychiatric centre (n = 240). Latent Class Analysis was conducted to reconfirm previously found patient profiles. Patient profiles were based on risk factors, psychopathology, and offence type. Repeated measures ANOVAs were conducted to assess treatment progress for the whole patient group, for high and low risk patients, and for patients who had been in treatment for a period longer and shorter than one year.

Latent Class Analysis has not reconfirmed the previously found profiles, therefore a repeated measures ANOVA was not conducted on profile level. On group-level, no significant progress was found. Though, patients with low protective behaviour, low resocialization scores, and high problem behaviour scores displayed significant treatment progress. Patients with low problematic behaviour showed a significant increase of problematic behaviour and patients with high protective behaviour a decrease of protective behaviour. Results indicated an interaction effect between time of admission and the factor resocialization skills, however this effect was not found for the other two factors.

Results imply that higher risk patients can show more treatment progress than lower risk patients.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)9-16
JournalInternational Journal of Law and Psychiatry
Volume57
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2018

Fingerprint

psychiatric treatment
monitoring
evaluation
resocialization
psychopathology
psychiatry
Group
Risk Reduction Behavior
offense
interaction

Cite this

@article{bb1636f01b4b4586915baa03e765dfb3,
title = "Forensic psychiatric treatment evaluation: The Clinical evaluation of treatment progress with multiple forensic routine outcome monitoring measures",
abstract = "The likelihood of recidivism is considered to be the most important outcome measure in forensic psychiatry. Therefore, forensic psychiatric treatment focuses on the reduction of the risk of recidivism by treating dynamic risk and protective factors, aiming to reduce risk factors while enhancing protective factors during treatment.The goal of this study is to assess treatment progress with the Instrument for Forensic Treatment Evaluation (IFTE) in a Dutch forensic psychiatric centre (n = 240). Latent Class Analysis was conducted to reconfirm previously found patient profiles. Patient profiles were based on risk factors, psychopathology, and offence type. Repeated measures ANOVAs were conducted to assess treatment progress for the whole patient group, for high and low risk patients, and for patients who had been in treatment for a period longer and shorter than one year.Latent Class Analysis has not reconfirmed the previously found profiles, therefore a repeated measures ANOVA was not conducted on profile level. On group-level, no significant progress was found. Though, patients with low protective behaviour, low resocialization scores, and high problem behaviour scores displayed significant treatment progress. Patients with low problematic behaviour showed a significant increase of problematic behaviour and patients with high protective behaviour a decrease of protective behaviour. Results indicated an interaction effect between time of admission and the factor resocialization skills, however this effect was not found for the other two factors.Results imply that higher risk patients can show more treatment progress than lower risk patients.",
author = "{van der Veeken}, F. and J. Lucieer and Stefan Bogaerts",
year = "2018",
doi = "10.1016/j.ijlp.2017.12.002",
language = "English",
volume = "57",
pages = "9--16",
journal = "International Journal of Law and Psychiatry",
issn = "0160-2527",
publisher = "Elsevier Limited",

}

Forensic psychiatric treatment evaluation : The Clinical evaluation of treatment progress with multiple forensic routine outcome monitoring measures. / van der Veeken, F.; Lucieer, J.; Bogaerts, Stefan.

In: International Journal of Law and Psychiatry, Vol. 57, 2018, p. 9-16.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Forensic psychiatric treatment evaluation

T2 - The Clinical evaluation of treatment progress with multiple forensic routine outcome monitoring measures

AU - van der Veeken, F.

AU - Lucieer, J.

AU - Bogaerts, Stefan

PY - 2018

Y1 - 2018

N2 - The likelihood of recidivism is considered to be the most important outcome measure in forensic psychiatry. Therefore, forensic psychiatric treatment focuses on the reduction of the risk of recidivism by treating dynamic risk and protective factors, aiming to reduce risk factors while enhancing protective factors during treatment.The goal of this study is to assess treatment progress with the Instrument for Forensic Treatment Evaluation (IFTE) in a Dutch forensic psychiatric centre (n = 240). Latent Class Analysis was conducted to reconfirm previously found patient profiles. Patient profiles were based on risk factors, psychopathology, and offence type. Repeated measures ANOVAs were conducted to assess treatment progress for the whole patient group, for high and low risk patients, and for patients who had been in treatment for a period longer and shorter than one year.Latent Class Analysis has not reconfirmed the previously found profiles, therefore a repeated measures ANOVA was not conducted on profile level. On group-level, no significant progress was found. Though, patients with low protective behaviour, low resocialization scores, and high problem behaviour scores displayed significant treatment progress. Patients with low problematic behaviour showed a significant increase of problematic behaviour and patients with high protective behaviour a decrease of protective behaviour. Results indicated an interaction effect between time of admission and the factor resocialization skills, however this effect was not found for the other two factors.Results imply that higher risk patients can show more treatment progress than lower risk patients.

AB - The likelihood of recidivism is considered to be the most important outcome measure in forensic psychiatry. Therefore, forensic psychiatric treatment focuses on the reduction of the risk of recidivism by treating dynamic risk and protective factors, aiming to reduce risk factors while enhancing protective factors during treatment.The goal of this study is to assess treatment progress with the Instrument for Forensic Treatment Evaluation (IFTE) in a Dutch forensic psychiatric centre (n = 240). Latent Class Analysis was conducted to reconfirm previously found patient profiles. Patient profiles were based on risk factors, psychopathology, and offence type. Repeated measures ANOVAs were conducted to assess treatment progress for the whole patient group, for high and low risk patients, and for patients who had been in treatment for a period longer and shorter than one year.Latent Class Analysis has not reconfirmed the previously found profiles, therefore a repeated measures ANOVA was not conducted on profile level. On group-level, no significant progress was found. Though, patients with low protective behaviour, low resocialization scores, and high problem behaviour scores displayed significant treatment progress. Patients with low problematic behaviour showed a significant increase of problematic behaviour and patients with high protective behaviour a decrease of protective behaviour. Results indicated an interaction effect between time of admission and the factor resocialization skills, however this effect was not found for the other two factors.Results imply that higher risk patients can show more treatment progress than lower risk patients.

U2 - 10.1016/j.ijlp.2017.12.002

DO - 10.1016/j.ijlp.2017.12.002

M3 - Article

VL - 57

SP - 9

EP - 16

JO - International Journal of Law and Psychiatry

JF - International Journal of Law and Psychiatry

SN - 0160-2527

ER -