Framing and the Annuitization Decision: Experimental Evidence from a Dutch Pension Fund

Christian Bockweg, Eduard Ponds, O.W. Steenbeek, Joyce Vonken

Research output: Working paperDiscussion paperOther research output

Abstract

We report the effects of framing and default settings in annuity demand after conducting a survey-based experiment with over 3,000 members of a Dutch occupational pension plan. The participants were asked to allocate their real projected pension accrual between a life annuity and a partial lump sum. In particular, we investigated the joint effects of consumption and investment frames and gain and loss frames. We present strong evidence for framing and default setting effects in annuity demand. We also find robust evidence of individual characteristics of influence annuity demand, highlighting the importance of heterogeneity among participants. Framing and default effects remain significant when we control for individual characteristics. We conclude Dutch plan members generally welcome the partial lump sum option over full annuitization. Framing and default settings are generally capable of predictively steering annuity demand. The precise effect framing may have also depends on the institutional environment, which predefines the perspective through which individuals filter annuities.
Original languageEnglish
Place of PublicationTilburg
PublisherNETSPAR
Number of pages33
Publication statusPublished - 2 Mar 2016

Publication series

NameNetspar Discussion Paper
Volume03/2016-007

Keywords

  • annuity puzzle
  • framing
  • pension annuities
  • lump sum

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Framing and the Annuitization Decision: Experimental Evidence from a Dutch Pension Fund'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this