Framing and the Annuitization Decision: Experimental Evidence from a Dutch Pension Fund

Christian Bockweg, Eduard Ponds, O.W. Steenbeek, Joyce Vonken

Research output: Working paperDiscussion paperOther research output

91 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

We report the effects of framing and default settings in annuity demand after conducting a survey-based experiment with over 3,000 members of a Dutch occupational pension plan. The participants were asked to allocate their real projected pension accrual between a life annuity and a partial lump sum. In particular, we investigated the joint effects of consumption and investment frames and gain and loss frames. We present strong evidence for framing and default setting effects in annuity demand. We also find robust evidence of individual characteristics of influence annuity demand, highlighting the importance of heterogeneity among participants. Framing and default effects remain significant when we control for individual characteristics. We conclude Dutch plan members generally welcome the partial lump sum option over full annuitization. Framing and default settings are generally capable of predictively steering annuity demand. The precise effect framing may have also depends on the institutional environment, which predefines the perspective through which individuals filter annuities.
Original languageEnglish
Place of PublicationTilburg
PublisherNETSPAR
Number of pages33
Publication statusPublished - 2 Mar 2016

Publication series

NameNetspar Discussion Paper
Volume03/2016-007

Fingerprint

Annuitization
Pension funds
Annuities
Individual characteristics
Framing effects
Life annuities
Pension plans
Experiment
Pensions
Occupational pension
Institutional environment
Filter

Keywords

  • annuity puzzle
  • framing
  • pension annuities
  • lump sum

Cite this

Bockweg, C., Ponds, E., Steenbeek, O. W., & Vonken, J. (2016). Framing and the Annuitization Decision: Experimental Evidence from a Dutch Pension Fund. (Netspar Discussion Paper; Vol. 03/2016-007). Tilburg: NETSPAR.
Bockweg, Christian ; Ponds, Eduard ; Steenbeek, O.W. ; Vonken, Joyce. / Framing and the Annuitization Decision : Experimental Evidence from a Dutch Pension Fund. Tilburg : NETSPAR, 2016. (Netspar Discussion Paper).
@techreport{92cb586537594017abd255ea010827bc,
title = "Framing and the Annuitization Decision: Experimental Evidence from a Dutch Pension Fund",
abstract = "We report the effects of framing and default settings in annuity demand after conducting a survey-based experiment with over 3,000 members of a Dutch occupational pension plan. The participants were asked to allocate their real projected pension accrual between a life annuity and a partial lump sum. In particular, we investigated the joint effects of consumption and investment frames and gain and loss frames. We present strong evidence for framing and default setting effects in annuity demand. We also find robust evidence of individual characteristics of influence annuity demand, highlighting the importance of heterogeneity among participants. Framing and default effects remain significant when we control for individual characteristics. We conclude Dutch plan members generally welcome the partial lump sum option over full annuitization. Framing and default settings are generally capable of predictively steering annuity demand. The precise effect framing may have also depends on the institutional environment, which predefines the perspective through which individuals filter annuities.",
keywords = "annuity puzzle, framing, pension annuities, lump sum",
author = "Christian Bockweg and Eduard Ponds and O.W. Steenbeek and Joyce Vonken",
year = "2016",
month = "3",
day = "2",
language = "English",
series = "Netspar Discussion Paper",
publisher = "NETSPAR",
type = "WorkingPaper",
institution = "NETSPAR",

}

Bockweg, C, Ponds, E, Steenbeek, OW & Vonken, J 2016 'Framing and the Annuitization Decision: Experimental Evidence from a Dutch Pension Fund' Netspar Discussion Paper, vol. 03/2016-007, NETSPAR, Tilburg.

Framing and the Annuitization Decision : Experimental Evidence from a Dutch Pension Fund. / Bockweg, Christian; Ponds, Eduard; Steenbeek, O.W.; Vonken, Joyce.

Tilburg : NETSPAR, 2016. (Netspar Discussion Paper; Vol. 03/2016-007).

Research output: Working paperDiscussion paperOther research output

TY - UNPB

T1 - Framing and the Annuitization Decision

T2 - Experimental Evidence from a Dutch Pension Fund

AU - Bockweg, Christian

AU - Ponds, Eduard

AU - Steenbeek, O.W.

AU - Vonken, Joyce

PY - 2016/3/2

Y1 - 2016/3/2

N2 - We report the effects of framing and default settings in annuity demand after conducting a survey-based experiment with over 3,000 members of a Dutch occupational pension plan. The participants were asked to allocate their real projected pension accrual between a life annuity and a partial lump sum. In particular, we investigated the joint effects of consumption and investment frames and gain and loss frames. We present strong evidence for framing and default setting effects in annuity demand. We also find robust evidence of individual characteristics of influence annuity demand, highlighting the importance of heterogeneity among participants. Framing and default effects remain significant when we control for individual characteristics. We conclude Dutch plan members generally welcome the partial lump sum option over full annuitization. Framing and default settings are generally capable of predictively steering annuity demand. The precise effect framing may have also depends on the institutional environment, which predefines the perspective through which individuals filter annuities.

AB - We report the effects of framing and default settings in annuity demand after conducting a survey-based experiment with over 3,000 members of a Dutch occupational pension plan. The participants were asked to allocate their real projected pension accrual between a life annuity and a partial lump sum. In particular, we investigated the joint effects of consumption and investment frames and gain and loss frames. We present strong evidence for framing and default setting effects in annuity demand. We also find robust evidence of individual characteristics of influence annuity demand, highlighting the importance of heterogeneity among participants. Framing and default effects remain significant when we control for individual characteristics. We conclude Dutch plan members generally welcome the partial lump sum option over full annuitization. Framing and default settings are generally capable of predictively steering annuity demand. The precise effect framing may have also depends on the institutional environment, which predefines the perspective through which individuals filter annuities.

KW - annuity puzzle

KW - framing

KW - pension annuities

KW - lump sum

M3 - Discussion paper

T3 - Netspar Discussion Paper

BT - Framing and the Annuitization Decision

PB - NETSPAR

CY - Tilburg

ER -

Bockweg C, Ponds E, Steenbeek OW, Vonken J. Framing and the Annuitization Decision: Experimental Evidence from a Dutch Pension Fund. Tilburg: NETSPAR. 2016 Mar 2. (Netspar Discussion Paper).