Abstract
Voters using Voting Advice Applications (VAAs) often struggle with comprehension, leading to satisficing behavior. Conversational Agent VAAs (CAVAAs) aim to improve understanding by allowing users to ask a chatbot comprehension questions. While early research shows positive effects, studies have only compared CAVAAs to basic VAAs, not to enhanced VAAs (VAA+s) with clickable information buttons. Current study compares four versions: a basic VAA, a VAA+, a CAVAA, and a CAVAA+, tested on desktop (Study 1) and smartphone (Study 2). Results show that all three information-rich versions reduce non-directional answers and positively impact political and tool evaluation measures, suggesting that added information, regardless of format, improves response quality and user experience. Interestingly, users request more information in the enhanced web-based VAA+ than via the chatbot. We discuss these and other findings in the paper.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Number of pages | 28 |
| Journal | Communication Research |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | E-pub ahead of print - 19 Mar 2026 |
Keywords
- conversational agent
- voting advice application
- smartphone
- desktop
- political information
- satisficing behavior
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'From buttons to bots: Exploring the impact of enhanced features in voting advice applications on desktops and smartphones'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver