From Policy “Frames” to “Framing”

Theorizing a More Dynamic, Political Approach

M.J. van Hulst, Dvora Yanow

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

876 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

The concept of frames or framing, especially cast as “frame analysis,” has an established history in public policy. Taking off from the work of Donald Schön and Martin Rein, we develop the idea of policy analytic framing, the more dynamic of the two terms, in ways that strengthen what we see as its promise for a more process-oriented and politically sensitive understanding of the activities it is used to characterize. We argue that such an approach needs to engage
the following aspects of the work that framing does: sense-making; selecting, naming, and categorizing; and storytelling. In addition, frame theorizing needs to engage not only the way issues are framed but also the intertwining of framing and frame-makers’ identities, and the meta-communicative framing of policy processes.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)92–112
JournalThe American Review of Public Administration
Volume46
Issue number1
Publication statusPublished - 2016

Fingerprint

public policy
history
Theorizing
Storytelling
Public policy
Sensemaking
Policy process

Keywords

  • policy framing, policy frames, frame analysis, policy analysis, sense-making, naming, categorizing,

Cite this

@article{78a6142b7f3c46c78ade590613a8d9fa,
title = "From Policy “Frames” to “Framing”: Theorizing a More Dynamic, Political Approach",
abstract = "The concept of frames or framing, especially cast as “frame analysis,” has an established history in public policy. Taking off from the work of Donald Sch{\"o}n and Martin Rein, we develop the idea of policy analytic framing, the more dynamic of the two terms, in ways that strengthen what we see as its promise for a more process-oriented and politically sensitive understanding of the activities it is used to characterize. We argue that such an approach needs to engagethe following aspects of the work that framing does: sense-making; selecting, naming, and categorizing; and storytelling. In addition, frame theorizing needs to engage not only the way issues are framed but also the intertwining of framing and frame-makers’ identities, and the meta-communicative framing of policy processes.",
keywords = "policy framing, policy frames, frame analysis, policy analysis, sense-making, naming, categorizing,",
author = "{van Hulst}, M.J. and Dvora Yanow",
year = "2016",
language = "English",
volume = "46",
pages = "92–112",
journal = "The American Review of Public Administration",
issn = "0275-0740",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Inc.",
number = "1",

}

From Policy “Frames” to “Framing” : Theorizing a More Dynamic, Political Approach. / van Hulst, M.J.; Yanow, Dvora.

In: The American Review of Public Administration, Vol. 46, No. 1, 2016, p. 92–112.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - From Policy “Frames” to “Framing”

T2 - Theorizing a More Dynamic, Political Approach

AU - van Hulst, M.J.

AU - Yanow, Dvora

PY - 2016

Y1 - 2016

N2 - The concept of frames or framing, especially cast as “frame analysis,” has an established history in public policy. Taking off from the work of Donald Schön and Martin Rein, we develop the idea of policy analytic framing, the more dynamic of the two terms, in ways that strengthen what we see as its promise for a more process-oriented and politically sensitive understanding of the activities it is used to characterize. We argue that such an approach needs to engagethe following aspects of the work that framing does: sense-making; selecting, naming, and categorizing; and storytelling. In addition, frame theorizing needs to engage not only the way issues are framed but also the intertwining of framing and frame-makers’ identities, and the meta-communicative framing of policy processes.

AB - The concept of frames or framing, especially cast as “frame analysis,” has an established history in public policy. Taking off from the work of Donald Schön and Martin Rein, we develop the idea of policy analytic framing, the more dynamic of the two terms, in ways that strengthen what we see as its promise for a more process-oriented and politically sensitive understanding of the activities it is used to characterize. We argue that such an approach needs to engagethe following aspects of the work that framing does: sense-making; selecting, naming, and categorizing; and storytelling. In addition, frame theorizing needs to engage not only the way issues are framed but also the intertwining of framing and frame-makers’ identities, and the meta-communicative framing of policy processes.

KW - policy framing, policy frames, frame analysis, policy analysis, sense-making, naming, categorizing,

M3 - Article

VL - 46

SP - 92

EP - 112

JO - The American Review of Public Administration

JF - The American Review of Public Administration

SN - 0275-0740

IS - 1

ER -