From what to where: A setting-sensitive approach to organizational storytelling

Merlijn van Hulst, Sierk Ybema

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

Abstract

Extant literature on organizational storytelling assumes storytelling to be context-bound, but does not empirically detail or theorize how storytelling might differ across organizational settings. In the context of members’ everyday work lives, organizational storytelling research tends to focus on the content of stories and not on the actual telling. By addressing this omission, this paper makes three contributions. First, we offer a generic framework for analysing storytelling in situ by zooming in on the situated occurrence of storytelling through a focus on four questions: (1) What makes an event tellable? (2) What triggers its telling? (3) What form does the storytelling take? (4) What work does it do? By using ethnographic data gathered on storytelling in everyday police work, we empirically substantiate this framework. Our second contribution,
then, is to show how a setting-specific approach to studying storytelling may help to flesh out a fuller, more grounded account of story life in organizations. Finally, we propose a typology of different forms of settingspecific
discourse – meeting-room talk, workstation talk, canteen talk and closed-door talk – which allows researchers to further sensitize organizational research to the situated nature of organizational discourse.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1-27
Number of pages27
JournalOrganization Studies
DOIs
Publication statusE-pub ahead of print - 2019

Fingerprint

Law enforcement
Storytelling

Keywords

  • Context
  • discourse
  • ethnography
  • narrative
  • police
  • storytelling

Cite this

@article{3e98eae98efc48498064b2e9304168c1,
title = "From what to where: A setting-sensitive approach to organizational storytelling",
abstract = "Extant literature on organizational storytelling assumes storytelling to be context-bound, but does not empirically detail or theorize how storytelling might differ across organizational settings. In the context of members’ everyday work lives, organizational storytelling research tends to focus on the content of stories and not on the actual telling. By addressing this omission, this paper makes three contributions. First, we offer a generic framework for analysing storytelling in situ by zooming in on the situated occurrence of storytelling through a focus on four questions: (1) What makes an event tellable? (2) What triggers its telling? (3) What form does the storytelling take? (4) What work does it do? By using ethnographic data gathered on storytelling in everyday police work, we empirically substantiate this framework. Our second contribution,then, is to show how a setting-specific approach to studying storytelling may help to flesh out a fuller, more grounded account of story life in organizations. Finally, we propose a typology of different forms of settingspecificdiscourse – meeting-room talk, workstation talk, canteen talk and closed-door talk – which allows researchers to further sensitize organizational research to the situated nature of organizational discourse.",
keywords = "Context, discourse, ethnography, narrative, police, storytelling",
author = "{van Hulst}, Merlijn and Sierk Ybema",
year = "2019",
doi = "10.1177/0170840618815523",
language = "English",
pages = "1--27",
journal = "Organization Studies",
issn = "0170-8406",
publisher = "Sage Publications Ltd",

}

From what to where : A setting-sensitive approach to organizational storytelling. / van Hulst, Merlijn; Ybema, Sierk.

In: Organization Studies, 2019, p. 1-27.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - From what to where

T2 - A setting-sensitive approach to organizational storytelling

AU - van Hulst, Merlijn

AU - Ybema, Sierk

PY - 2019

Y1 - 2019

N2 - Extant literature on organizational storytelling assumes storytelling to be context-bound, but does not empirically detail or theorize how storytelling might differ across organizational settings. In the context of members’ everyday work lives, organizational storytelling research tends to focus on the content of stories and not on the actual telling. By addressing this omission, this paper makes three contributions. First, we offer a generic framework for analysing storytelling in situ by zooming in on the situated occurrence of storytelling through a focus on four questions: (1) What makes an event tellable? (2) What triggers its telling? (3) What form does the storytelling take? (4) What work does it do? By using ethnographic data gathered on storytelling in everyday police work, we empirically substantiate this framework. Our second contribution,then, is to show how a setting-specific approach to studying storytelling may help to flesh out a fuller, more grounded account of story life in organizations. Finally, we propose a typology of different forms of settingspecificdiscourse – meeting-room talk, workstation talk, canteen talk and closed-door talk – which allows researchers to further sensitize organizational research to the situated nature of organizational discourse.

AB - Extant literature on organizational storytelling assumes storytelling to be context-bound, but does not empirically detail or theorize how storytelling might differ across organizational settings. In the context of members’ everyday work lives, organizational storytelling research tends to focus on the content of stories and not on the actual telling. By addressing this omission, this paper makes three contributions. First, we offer a generic framework for analysing storytelling in situ by zooming in on the situated occurrence of storytelling through a focus on four questions: (1) What makes an event tellable? (2) What triggers its telling? (3) What form does the storytelling take? (4) What work does it do? By using ethnographic data gathered on storytelling in everyday police work, we empirically substantiate this framework. Our second contribution,then, is to show how a setting-specific approach to studying storytelling may help to flesh out a fuller, more grounded account of story life in organizations. Finally, we propose a typology of different forms of settingspecificdiscourse – meeting-room talk, workstation talk, canteen talk and closed-door talk – which allows researchers to further sensitize organizational research to the situated nature of organizational discourse.

KW - Context

KW - discourse

KW - ethnography

KW - narrative

KW - police

KW - storytelling

U2 - 10.1177/0170840618815523

DO - 10.1177/0170840618815523

M3 - Article

SP - 1

EP - 27

JO - Organization Studies

JF - Organization Studies

SN - 0170-8406

ER -