From zero to hero:

How zero-rating became a debate about human rights

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleProfessional

752 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Zero rating has become a perfect storm incorporating politics, profit and technical complexity. The claim that everyone has a right to internet connectivity is coming into conflict with the argument for net neutrality: will the provision of free data services via mobile phones worldwide privilege a small minority of content providers such as Facebook and Google, or will it provide valuable access to information and services for low-income people worldwide? This dichotomy, however, is based on a reductivist perspective that does not take into account the possible disadvantages of a reliance on mobile connectivity for a majority of the world’s citizens. If we add geographical and economic context into the debate, it becomes apparent that zero-rating could benefit some, but could also impoverish and further disadvantage many. Who are the winners and losers from a global perspective, and what are their chances against the prevailing wisdom of Silicon Valley?
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)79-83
Number of pages5
JournalIEEE Internet Computing
VolumeJuly/August
Publication statusPublished - 8 Jul 2016

Fingerprint

Mobile phones
Profitability
Internet
Silicon
Economics

Keywords

  • big data
  • human rights
  • mobile telecommuinications
  • INTERNET

Cite this

@article{4188cdd150d24decaf211c012f13c57c,
title = "From zero to hero:: How zero-rating became a debate about human rights",
abstract = "Zero rating has become a perfect storm incorporating politics, profit and technical complexity. The claim that everyone has a right to internet connectivity is coming into conflict with the argument for net neutrality: will the provision of free data services via mobile phones worldwide privilege a small minority of content providers such as Facebook and Google, or will it provide valuable access to information and services for low-income people worldwide? This dichotomy, however, is based on a reductivist perspective that does not take into account the possible disadvantages of a reliance on mobile connectivity for a majority of the world’s citizens. If we add geographical and economic context into the debate, it becomes apparent that zero-rating could benefit some, but could also impoverish and further disadvantage many. Who are the winners and losers from a global perspective, and what are their chances against the prevailing wisdom of Silicon Valley?",
keywords = "big data, human rights, mobile telecommuinications, INTERNET",
author = "Linnet Taylor",
year = "2016",
month = "7",
day = "8",
language = "English",
volume = "July/August",
pages = "79--83",
journal = "IEEE Internet Computing",
issn = "1089-7801",
publisher = "Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc.",

}

From zero to hero: How zero-rating became a debate about human rights. / Taylor, Linnet.

In: IEEE Internet Computing, Vol. July/August, 08.07.2016, p. 79-83.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleProfessional

TY - JOUR

T1 - From zero to hero:

T2 - How zero-rating became a debate about human rights

AU - Taylor, Linnet

PY - 2016/7/8

Y1 - 2016/7/8

N2 - Zero rating has become a perfect storm incorporating politics, profit and technical complexity. The claim that everyone has a right to internet connectivity is coming into conflict with the argument for net neutrality: will the provision of free data services via mobile phones worldwide privilege a small minority of content providers such as Facebook and Google, or will it provide valuable access to information and services for low-income people worldwide? This dichotomy, however, is based on a reductivist perspective that does not take into account the possible disadvantages of a reliance on mobile connectivity for a majority of the world’s citizens. If we add geographical and economic context into the debate, it becomes apparent that zero-rating could benefit some, but could also impoverish and further disadvantage many. Who are the winners and losers from a global perspective, and what are their chances against the prevailing wisdom of Silicon Valley?

AB - Zero rating has become a perfect storm incorporating politics, profit and technical complexity. The claim that everyone has a right to internet connectivity is coming into conflict with the argument for net neutrality: will the provision of free data services via mobile phones worldwide privilege a small minority of content providers such as Facebook and Google, or will it provide valuable access to information and services for low-income people worldwide? This dichotomy, however, is based on a reductivist perspective that does not take into account the possible disadvantages of a reliance on mobile connectivity for a majority of the world’s citizens. If we add geographical and economic context into the debate, it becomes apparent that zero-rating could benefit some, but could also impoverish and further disadvantage many. Who are the winners and losers from a global perspective, and what are their chances against the prevailing wisdom of Silicon Valley?

KW - big data

KW - human rights

KW - mobile telecommuinications

KW - INTERNET

M3 - Article

VL - July/August

SP - 79

EP - 83

JO - IEEE Internet Computing

JF - IEEE Internet Computing

SN - 1089-7801

ER -