Galona’s review of victim labelling theory

A rejoinder

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

Abstract

In this article the author responds to a review by Galona (2018) of the historical-theological parts of victim labelling theory as elaborated previously in this journal and elsewhere (van Dijk, 2009).
According to Galona, the term ‘victima/victim’ as a special name for Jesus Christ was not coined by Reformation theologians like Calvin, as asserted by van Dijk, but was for example already widely used by Roman poets. It also appeared in pre-Reformation theological writings for centuries. In his rejoinder, the author explains that Roman poets indeed sometimes used the term ‘victima’ for
human beings but did so in a purely metaphorical sense. He agrees with Galona that the use of this label in its figural sense denoting Christ’s deep and innocent suffering emerged in theological writings pre-dating the Reformation. However, the label only ‘went viral’ around the time of the Reformation and has, from that time onwards, been the universal colloquial term for ordinary people victimised by crime across the Western world. In the second part of the article, the author
elaborates on the theoretical and practical implications of the Christian roots of the ‘victima’ label.
For centuries, victims of crime were expected to undergo their suffering meekly, in imitation of Christ. Ongoing secularisation has emancipated crime victims from the restraining ‘victima’ label, allowing them to freely speak up for themselves. Recent victim-friendly reforms of criminal justice have been driven by the need to find a new, victim-centred legitimacy in an increasingly secularised world.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)125-131
Number of pages7
JournalInternational Review of Victimology
Volume25
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jan 2019

Fingerprint

reformation
offense
writer
colloquial
theologian
secularization
imitation
Western world
legitimacy
justice
reform
time

Keywords

  • victims
  • labelling
  • Jesus Christ
  • the Reformation
  • retraumatisation
  • secularisation
  • criminal justice

Cite this

@article{2a9d978de8514a15a4806d2635eb3587,
title = "Galona’s review of victim labelling theory: A rejoinder",
abstract = "In this article the author responds to a review by Galona (2018) of the historical-theological parts of victim labelling theory as elaborated previously in this journal and elsewhere (van Dijk, 2009).According to Galona, the term ‘victima/victim’ as a special name for Jesus Christ was not coined by Reformation theologians like Calvin, as asserted by van Dijk, but was for example already widely used by Roman poets. It also appeared in pre-Reformation theological writings for centuries. In his rejoinder, the author explains that Roman poets indeed sometimes used the term ‘victima’ forhuman beings but did so in a purely metaphorical sense. He agrees with Galona that the use of this label in its figural sense denoting Christ’s deep and innocent suffering emerged in theological writings pre-dating the Reformation. However, the label only ‘went viral’ around the time of the Reformation and has, from that time onwards, been the universal colloquial term for ordinary people victimised by crime across the Western world. In the second part of the article, the authorelaborates on the theoretical and practical implications of the Christian roots of the ‘victima’ label.For centuries, victims of crime were expected to undergo their suffering meekly, in imitation of Christ. Ongoing secularisation has emancipated crime victims from the restraining ‘victima’ label, allowing them to freely speak up for themselves. Recent victim-friendly reforms of criminal justice have been driven by the need to find a new, victim-centred legitimacy in an increasingly secularised world.",
keywords = "victims, labelling, Jesus Christ, the Reformation, retraumatisation, secularisation, criminal justice",
author = "{van Dijk}, Jan",
year = "2019",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1177/0269758018805558",
language = "English",
volume = "25",
pages = "125--131",
journal = "International Review of Victimology",
issn = "0269-7580",
publisher = "A B Academic Publishers",
number = "1",

}

Galona’s review of victim labelling theory : A rejoinder. / van Dijk, Jan.

In: International Review of Victimology, Vol. 25 , No. 1, 01.01.2019, p. 125-131.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Galona’s review of victim labelling theory

T2 - A rejoinder

AU - van Dijk, Jan

PY - 2019/1/1

Y1 - 2019/1/1

N2 - In this article the author responds to a review by Galona (2018) of the historical-theological parts of victim labelling theory as elaborated previously in this journal and elsewhere (van Dijk, 2009).According to Galona, the term ‘victima/victim’ as a special name for Jesus Christ was not coined by Reformation theologians like Calvin, as asserted by van Dijk, but was for example already widely used by Roman poets. It also appeared in pre-Reformation theological writings for centuries. In his rejoinder, the author explains that Roman poets indeed sometimes used the term ‘victima’ forhuman beings but did so in a purely metaphorical sense. He agrees with Galona that the use of this label in its figural sense denoting Christ’s deep and innocent suffering emerged in theological writings pre-dating the Reformation. However, the label only ‘went viral’ around the time of the Reformation and has, from that time onwards, been the universal colloquial term for ordinary people victimised by crime across the Western world. In the second part of the article, the authorelaborates on the theoretical and practical implications of the Christian roots of the ‘victima’ label.For centuries, victims of crime were expected to undergo their suffering meekly, in imitation of Christ. Ongoing secularisation has emancipated crime victims from the restraining ‘victima’ label, allowing them to freely speak up for themselves. Recent victim-friendly reforms of criminal justice have been driven by the need to find a new, victim-centred legitimacy in an increasingly secularised world.

AB - In this article the author responds to a review by Galona (2018) of the historical-theological parts of victim labelling theory as elaborated previously in this journal and elsewhere (van Dijk, 2009).According to Galona, the term ‘victima/victim’ as a special name for Jesus Christ was not coined by Reformation theologians like Calvin, as asserted by van Dijk, but was for example already widely used by Roman poets. It also appeared in pre-Reformation theological writings for centuries. In his rejoinder, the author explains that Roman poets indeed sometimes used the term ‘victima’ forhuman beings but did so in a purely metaphorical sense. He agrees with Galona that the use of this label in its figural sense denoting Christ’s deep and innocent suffering emerged in theological writings pre-dating the Reformation. However, the label only ‘went viral’ around the time of the Reformation and has, from that time onwards, been the universal colloquial term for ordinary people victimised by crime across the Western world. In the second part of the article, the authorelaborates on the theoretical and practical implications of the Christian roots of the ‘victima’ label.For centuries, victims of crime were expected to undergo their suffering meekly, in imitation of Christ. Ongoing secularisation has emancipated crime victims from the restraining ‘victima’ label, allowing them to freely speak up for themselves. Recent victim-friendly reforms of criminal justice have been driven by the need to find a new, victim-centred legitimacy in an increasingly secularised world.

KW - victims

KW - labelling

KW - Jesus Christ

KW - the Reformation

KW - retraumatisation

KW - secularisation

KW - criminal justice

U2 - 10.1177/0269758018805558

DO - 10.1177/0269758018805558

M3 - Article

VL - 25

SP - 125

EP - 131

JO - International Review of Victimology

JF - International Review of Victimology

SN - 0269-7580

IS - 1

ER -