Getting behind closed doors

Reflections on legislation to prevent domestic violence

R. Römkens, K. Lünnemann

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

Abstract

The call for preventive interventions to curb domestic violence is becoming stronger. The barring order has been launched as an innovative approach to preventing domestic violence. It allows the police to temporarily bar the perpetrator of domestic violence from entering his or her home, as a way to create safety for the victim and children and to start support programmes for victim and perpetrator. This article provides a brief review of experiences with the barring order in Austria, Germany, and the Netherlands. The results of the evaluation of the recently proposed Dutch barring order will be discussed, as well as their theoretical implications. The results indicate that the implementation of the new measure is facing reluctance among the police. It is argued that this points to more than empirical start-up problems, but reflects the dominant impact of law. Because the implementation of the barring order is in the hands of the police, a dynamic is created that is often at odds with the preventive nature of the measure, which requires taking a less legalistic and more process-oriented approach to domestic violence. It begs the fundamental question of whether and how prevention of domestic violence can be realized when assigning the gate-keeping task to the police. Related to this is a broader question: how can perpetrators’ and victims’ interests, and victims’ agency, be safeguarded when the state takes control?
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)173-194
JournalInternational Journal of Comparative and Applied Criminal Justice
Volume32
Issue number2
Publication statusPublished - 2008

Fingerprint

Legislation
domestic violence
Police
legislation
police
Austria
Netherlands
Germany
Law
evaluation
experience

Cite this

@article{1c84716c6df54b44b008767410e4650c,
title = "Getting behind closed doors: Reflections on legislation to prevent domestic violence",
abstract = "The call for preventive interventions to curb domestic violence is becoming stronger. The barring order has been launched as an innovative approach to preventing domestic violence. It allows the police to temporarily bar the perpetrator of domestic violence from entering his or her home, as a way to create safety for the victim and children and to start support programmes for victim and perpetrator. This article provides a brief review of experiences with the barring order in Austria, Germany, and the Netherlands. The results of the evaluation of the recently proposed Dutch barring order will be discussed, as well as their theoretical implications. The results indicate that the implementation of the new measure is facing reluctance among the police. It is argued that this points to more than empirical start-up problems, but reflects the dominant impact of law. Because the implementation of the barring order is in the hands of the police, a dynamic is created that is often at odds with the preventive nature of the measure, which requires taking a less legalistic and more process-oriented approach to domestic violence. It begs the fundamental question of whether and how prevention of domestic violence can be realized when assigning the gate-keeping task to the police. Related to this is a broader question: how can perpetrators’ and victims’ interests, and victims’ agency, be safeguarded when the state takes control?",
author = "R. R{\"o}mkens and K. L{\"u}nnemann",
note = "Journal Article / International / Refereed",
year = "2008",
language = "English",
volume = "32",
pages = "173--194",
journal = "International Journal of Comparative and Applied Criminal Justice",
issn = "0192-4036",
publisher = "Routledge",
number = "2",

}

Getting behind closed doors : Reflections on legislation to prevent domestic violence. / Römkens, R.; Lünnemann, K.

In: International Journal of Comparative and Applied Criminal Justice, Vol. 32, No. 2, 2008, p. 173-194.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Getting behind closed doors

T2 - Reflections on legislation to prevent domestic violence

AU - Römkens, R.

AU - Lünnemann, K.

N1 - Journal Article / International / Refereed

PY - 2008

Y1 - 2008

N2 - The call for preventive interventions to curb domestic violence is becoming stronger. The barring order has been launched as an innovative approach to preventing domestic violence. It allows the police to temporarily bar the perpetrator of domestic violence from entering his or her home, as a way to create safety for the victim and children and to start support programmes for victim and perpetrator. This article provides a brief review of experiences with the barring order in Austria, Germany, and the Netherlands. The results of the evaluation of the recently proposed Dutch barring order will be discussed, as well as their theoretical implications. The results indicate that the implementation of the new measure is facing reluctance among the police. It is argued that this points to more than empirical start-up problems, but reflects the dominant impact of law. Because the implementation of the barring order is in the hands of the police, a dynamic is created that is often at odds with the preventive nature of the measure, which requires taking a less legalistic and more process-oriented approach to domestic violence. It begs the fundamental question of whether and how prevention of domestic violence can be realized when assigning the gate-keeping task to the police. Related to this is a broader question: how can perpetrators’ and victims’ interests, and victims’ agency, be safeguarded when the state takes control?

AB - The call for preventive interventions to curb domestic violence is becoming stronger. The barring order has been launched as an innovative approach to preventing domestic violence. It allows the police to temporarily bar the perpetrator of domestic violence from entering his or her home, as a way to create safety for the victim and children and to start support programmes for victim and perpetrator. This article provides a brief review of experiences with the barring order in Austria, Germany, and the Netherlands. The results of the evaluation of the recently proposed Dutch barring order will be discussed, as well as their theoretical implications. The results indicate that the implementation of the new measure is facing reluctance among the police. It is argued that this points to more than empirical start-up problems, but reflects the dominant impact of law. Because the implementation of the barring order is in the hands of the police, a dynamic is created that is often at odds with the preventive nature of the measure, which requires taking a less legalistic and more process-oriented approach to domestic violence. It begs the fundamental question of whether and how prevention of domestic violence can be realized when assigning the gate-keeping task to the police. Related to this is a broader question: how can perpetrators’ and victims’ interests, and victims’ agency, be safeguarded when the state takes control?

M3 - Article

VL - 32

SP - 173

EP - 194

JO - International Journal of Comparative and Applied Criminal Justice

JF - International Journal of Comparative and Applied Criminal Justice

SN - 0192-4036

IS - 2

ER -