Good tax governance and transparency

A matter of ethical motivation

Ave-Geidi Jallai, Hans Gribnau

Research output: Working paperOther research output

Abstract

Multinationals’ tax practices are the subject of much discussion nowadays. The media has been reporting stories about tax avoidance and/or companies not paying their “fair share” of taxes. Thus, multinational enterprises are currently in the eye of the storm. Their allegedly aggressive tax planning practices have led to public outcry. Politicians have shared this public sentiment, sometimes even accusing these multinationals of “immoral” behaviour. There are no clear signs that the storm will calm soon. What should multinationals do?

The current debate clearly calls for ethical reflection. It appears that there is something inherent in tax planning that is not covered by the traditional legal distinction between (illegal) corporate tax evasion and tax avoidance. Aggressive tax planning is not discussed in terms of legal or illegal behaviour, but in moral terms. This development demands that multinational enterprises reflect on their tax planning strategy – not only in economic and legal terms, but also in ethical terms. Therefore, this article addresses the relationship between society, morality and taxes. Morality regards the behaviour of individuals, but does it also concern the behaviour of businesses? Furthermore, the concept of tax planning is elaborated on, and we will show that the concepts “aggressive tax planning”, “tax evasion” and “tax avoidance” represent different relationships between law and morality. Taxes are a cost item, but aggressive tax planning may also imply certain costs. Reputation damage, for example, may involve considerable costs. It will be argued that in order to improve corporate reputation, corporate social responsibility (CSR) is a helpful tool.
Could (moral) leadership be shown by including tax in a business’ CSR strategy? Moreover, does the ethical obligation to go beyond what is required by the law – key to CSR companies – encompass transparency? Good tax governance should enhance accountability and transparency, thus diminishing information asymmetry. In this regard, we propose to make a distinction between an intrinsic motivation to do the right thing (with a favourable reputation as an upshot) and extrinsic motivation (such as concern for favourable reputation in order to boost shareholder value).
Original languageEnglish
PublisherSSRN
Number of pages17
VolumeTilburg Law School Research Paper No. 06/2016
Publication statusPublished - 2016

Fingerprint

Governance
Tax
Tax planning
Transparency
Morality
Tax avoidance
Multinationals
Corporate Social Responsibility
Costs
Tax evasion
Multinational enterprises
Intrinsic motivation
Information asymmetry
Corporate reputation
Politicians
Extrinsic motivation
Accountability
Damage
Shareholder value
Obligation

Cite this

@techreport{b84f77bf7de242d88eb677312204b46b,
title = "Good tax governance and transparency: A matter of ethical motivation",
abstract = "Multinationals’ tax practices are the subject of much discussion nowadays. The media has been reporting stories about tax avoidance and/or companies not paying their “fair share” of taxes. Thus, multinational enterprises are currently in the eye of the storm. Their allegedly aggressive tax planning practices have led to public outcry. Politicians have shared this public sentiment, sometimes even accusing these multinationals of “immoral” behaviour. There are no clear signs that the storm will calm soon. What should multinationals do? The current debate clearly calls for ethical reflection. It appears that there is something inherent in tax planning that is not covered by the traditional legal distinction between (illegal) corporate tax evasion and tax avoidance. Aggressive tax planning is not discussed in terms of legal or illegal behaviour, but in moral terms. This development demands that multinational enterprises reflect on their tax planning strategy – not only in economic and legal terms, but also in ethical terms. Therefore, this article addresses the relationship between society, morality and taxes. Morality regards the behaviour of individuals, but does it also concern the behaviour of businesses? Furthermore, the concept of tax planning is elaborated on, and we will show that the concepts “aggressive tax planning”, “tax evasion” and “tax avoidance” represent different relationships between law and morality. Taxes are a cost item, but aggressive tax planning may also imply certain costs. Reputation damage, for example, may involve considerable costs. It will be argued that in order to improve corporate reputation, corporate social responsibility (CSR) is a helpful tool.Could (moral) leadership be shown by including tax in a business’ CSR strategy? Moreover, does the ethical obligation to go beyond what is required by the law – key to CSR companies – encompass transparency? Good tax governance should enhance accountability and transparency, thus diminishing information asymmetry. In this regard, we propose to make a distinction between an intrinsic motivation to do the right thing (with a favourable reputation as an upshot) and extrinsic motivation (such as concern for favourable reputation in order to boost shareholder value).",
author = "Ave-Geidi Jallai and Hans Gribnau",
year = "2016",
language = "English",
volume = "Tilburg Law School Research Paper No. 06/2016",
publisher = "SSRN",
type = "WorkingPaper",
institution = "SSRN",

}

Good tax governance and transparency : A matter of ethical motivation. / Jallai, Ave-Geidi; Gribnau, Hans.

SSRN, 2016.

Research output: Working paperOther research output

TY - UNPB

T1 - Good tax governance and transparency

T2 - A matter of ethical motivation

AU - Jallai, Ave-Geidi

AU - Gribnau, Hans

PY - 2016

Y1 - 2016

N2 - Multinationals’ tax practices are the subject of much discussion nowadays. The media has been reporting stories about tax avoidance and/or companies not paying their “fair share” of taxes. Thus, multinational enterprises are currently in the eye of the storm. Their allegedly aggressive tax planning practices have led to public outcry. Politicians have shared this public sentiment, sometimes even accusing these multinationals of “immoral” behaviour. There are no clear signs that the storm will calm soon. What should multinationals do? The current debate clearly calls for ethical reflection. It appears that there is something inherent in tax planning that is not covered by the traditional legal distinction between (illegal) corporate tax evasion and tax avoidance. Aggressive tax planning is not discussed in terms of legal or illegal behaviour, but in moral terms. This development demands that multinational enterprises reflect on their tax planning strategy – not only in economic and legal terms, but also in ethical terms. Therefore, this article addresses the relationship between society, morality and taxes. Morality regards the behaviour of individuals, but does it also concern the behaviour of businesses? Furthermore, the concept of tax planning is elaborated on, and we will show that the concepts “aggressive tax planning”, “tax evasion” and “tax avoidance” represent different relationships between law and morality. Taxes are a cost item, but aggressive tax planning may also imply certain costs. Reputation damage, for example, may involve considerable costs. It will be argued that in order to improve corporate reputation, corporate social responsibility (CSR) is a helpful tool.Could (moral) leadership be shown by including tax in a business’ CSR strategy? Moreover, does the ethical obligation to go beyond what is required by the law – key to CSR companies – encompass transparency? Good tax governance should enhance accountability and transparency, thus diminishing information asymmetry. In this regard, we propose to make a distinction between an intrinsic motivation to do the right thing (with a favourable reputation as an upshot) and extrinsic motivation (such as concern for favourable reputation in order to boost shareholder value).

AB - Multinationals’ tax practices are the subject of much discussion nowadays. The media has been reporting stories about tax avoidance and/or companies not paying their “fair share” of taxes. Thus, multinational enterprises are currently in the eye of the storm. Their allegedly aggressive tax planning practices have led to public outcry. Politicians have shared this public sentiment, sometimes even accusing these multinationals of “immoral” behaviour. There are no clear signs that the storm will calm soon. What should multinationals do? The current debate clearly calls for ethical reflection. It appears that there is something inherent in tax planning that is not covered by the traditional legal distinction between (illegal) corporate tax evasion and tax avoidance. Aggressive tax planning is not discussed in terms of legal or illegal behaviour, but in moral terms. This development demands that multinational enterprises reflect on their tax planning strategy – not only in economic and legal terms, but also in ethical terms. Therefore, this article addresses the relationship between society, morality and taxes. Morality regards the behaviour of individuals, but does it also concern the behaviour of businesses? Furthermore, the concept of tax planning is elaborated on, and we will show that the concepts “aggressive tax planning”, “tax evasion” and “tax avoidance” represent different relationships between law and morality. Taxes are a cost item, but aggressive tax planning may also imply certain costs. Reputation damage, for example, may involve considerable costs. It will be argued that in order to improve corporate reputation, corporate social responsibility (CSR) is a helpful tool.Could (moral) leadership be shown by including tax in a business’ CSR strategy? Moreover, does the ethical obligation to go beyond what is required by the law – key to CSR companies – encompass transparency? Good tax governance should enhance accountability and transparency, thus diminishing information asymmetry. In this regard, we propose to make a distinction between an intrinsic motivation to do the right thing (with a favourable reputation as an upshot) and extrinsic motivation (such as concern for favourable reputation in order to boost shareholder value).

M3 - Working paper

VL - Tilburg Law School Research Paper No. 06/2016

BT - Good tax governance and transparency

PB - SSRN

ER -