Group‐based shame, guilt, and regret across cultures

Marlies de Groot, Juliette Schaafsma, Thomas Castelain, Katarzyna Malinowska, Liesbeth Mann, Yohsuke Ohtsubo, Maria Theresia Asti Wulandari, Ruba Fahmi Bataineh, Douglas P. Fry, Martijn Goudbeek, Angela Suryani

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

Abstract

To date, there has been no systematic examination of cross-cultural differences in group-based shame, guilt, and regret following wrongdoing. Using a community sample (N = 1358), we examined people's reported experiences of shame, guilt, and regret following transgressions by themselves and by different identity groups (i.e., family, community, country) in Burkina Faso, Costa Rica, Indonesia, Japan, Jordan, the Netherlands, Poland, and the United States. We assessed whether any variation in this regard can be explained by the relative endorsement of individualistic or collectivistic values at the individual level and at the country level. Our findings suggest that people's reported experience of these emotions mostly depends on the transgression level. We also observe some variation across individuals and countries, which can be partially explained by the endorsement of collectivistic and individualistic values. The results highlight the importance of taking into account individual and cultural values when studying group-based emotions, as well as the identity groups involved in the transgression.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1198-1212
Number of pages15
JournalEuropean Journal of Social Psychology
Volume51
Issue number7
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Dec 2021

Keywords

  • Group-based emotions
  • Guilt
  • Individualism-collectivism
  • Shame

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Group‐based shame, guilt, and regret across cultures'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this