Health body priming and food choice: An eye tracking study

Valerio Manippa, Laura N. van der Laan, Alfredo Brancucci, Paul A.M. Smeets

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

Abstract

The “gaze bias theory” suggests that people tend to look longer at items that are eventually chosen. This was not entirely confirmed for food choice, a complex phenomenon influenced by many factors. Although it has been shown that health-related primes affect both consumer attention and choice, the effect of unhealthy body shape primes on these outcomes is largely unknown. Therefore, we here investigated how body primes, namely normal weight (NW), severely overweight (OW) and severely underweight (UW) body shapes, influenced attention and choice for low-calorie food (LcFd) and high-calorie food (HcFd). We hypothesized that OW and UW primes would activate opposing health goals (weight-loss vs. weight-gain respectively). Fifty normal weight sated females completed a primed food choice task in which choices between a LcFd and HcFd, matched for subjective liking, were presented after control or human body shapes (NW, UW or OW). In each trial participants had to identify the shape (i.e., non-human, human male or human female) and then choose the food they wanted to eat at that moment. Gaze was recorded by an eye tracker. Results showed that, although primes did not influence the choice, the total dwell time on chosen HcFd was higher when preceded by an OW prime compared with chosen LcFd and chosen HcFd preceded by an UW prime. Also, both total dwell time and the number of fixations were higher for chosen food compared with non-chosen food as well as for HcFd compared with LcFd without a corresponding higher proportion of HcFd choice. Overall, these data shed light on the interactions between attention, health body priming and food choice.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)116-125
Number of pages10
JournalFood Quality and Preference
Volume72
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Mar 2019

Fingerprint

Weights and Measures
Human Body
Weight Gain

Keywords

  • Attention
  • Body shapes
  • Eye-tracking
  • Food choice
  • Food preference
  • Gaze bias theory
  • Health priming

Cite this

Manippa, Valerio ; van der Laan, Laura N. ; Brancucci, Alfredo ; Smeets, Paul A.M. / Health body priming and food choice: An eye tracking study. In: Food Quality and Preference. 2019 ; Vol. 72. pp. 116-125.
@article{1b54a3131c714b969249205f1c293b9a,
title = "Health body priming and food choice: An eye tracking study",
abstract = "The “gaze bias theory” suggests that people tend to look longer at items that are eventually chosen. This was not entirely confirmed for food choice, a complex phenomenon influenced by many factors. Although it has been shown that health-related primes affect both consumer attention and choice, the effect of unhealthy body shape primes on these outcomes is largely unknown. Therefore, we here investigated how body primes, namely normal weight (NW), severely overweight (OW) and severely underweight (UW) body shapes, influenced attention and choice for low-calorie food (LcFd) and high-calorie food (HcFd). We hypothesized that OW and UW primes would activate opposing health goals (weight-loss vs. weight-gain respectively). Fifty normal weight sated females completed a primed food choice task in which choices between a LcFd and HcFd, matched for subjective liking, were presented after control or human body shapes (NW, UW or OW). In each trial participants had to identify the shape (i.e., non-human, human male or human female) and then choose the food they wanted to eat at that moment. Gaze was recorded by an eye tracker. Results showed that, although primes did not influence the choice, the total dwell time on chosen HcFd was higher when preceded by an OW prime compared with chosen LcFd and chosen HcFd preceded by an UW prime. Also, both total dwell time and the number of fixations were higher for chosen food compared with non-chosen food as well as for HcFd compared with LcFd without a corresponding higher proportion of HcFd choice. Overall, these data shed light on the interactions between attention, health body priming and food choice.",
keywords = "Attention, Body shapes, Eye-tracking, Food choice, Food preference, Gaze bias theory, Health priming",
author = "Valerio Manippa and {van der Laan}, {Laura N.} and Alfredo Brancucci and Smeets, {Paul A.M.}",
year = "2019",
month = "3",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.foodqual.2018.10.006",
language = "English",
volume = "72",
pages = "116--125",
journal = "Food Quality and Preference",
issn = "0950-3293",
publisher = "ELSEVIER SCI LTD",

}

Health body priming and food choice: An eye tracking study. / Manippa, Valerio; van der Laan, Laura N.; Brancucci, Alfredo; Smeets, Paul A.M.

In: Food Quality and Preference, Vol. 72, 01.03.2019, p. 116-125.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Health body priming and food choice: An eye tracking study

AU - Manippa, Valerio

AU - van der Laan, Laura N.

AU - Brancucci, Alfredo

AU - Smeets, Paul A.M.

PY - 2019/3/1

Y1 - 2019/3/1

N2 - The “gaze bias theory” suggests that people tend to look longer at items that are eventually chosen. This was not entirely confirmed for food choice, a complex phenomenon influenced by many factors. Although it has been shown that health-related primes affect both consumer attention and choice, the effect of unhealthy body shape primes on these outcomes is largely unknown. Therefore, we here investigated how body primes, namely normal weight (NW), severely overweight (OW) and severely underweight (UW) body shapes, influenced attention and choice for low-calorie food (LcFd) and high-calorie food (HcFd). We hypothesized that OW and UW primes would activate opposing health goals (weight-loss vs. weight-gain respectively). Fifty normal weight sated females completed a primed food choice task in which choices between a LcFd and HcFd, matched for subjective liking, were presented after control or human body shapes (NW, UW or OW). In each trial participants had to identify the shape (i.e., non-human, human male or human female) and then choose the food they wanted to eat at that moment. Gaze was recorded by an eye tracker. Results showed that, although primes did not influence the choice, the total dwell time on chosen HcFd was higher when preceded by an OW prime compared with chosen LcFd and chosen HcFd preceded by an UW prime. Also, both total dwell time and the number of fixations were higher for chosen food compared with non-chosen food as well as for HcFd compared with LcFd without a corresponding higher proportion of HcFd choice. Overall, these data shed light on the interactions between attention, health body priming and food choice.

AB - The “gaze bias theory” suggests that people tend to look longer at items that are eventually chosen. This was not entirely confirmed for food choice, a complex phenomenon influenced by many factors. Although it has been shown that health-related primes affect both consumer attention and choice, the effect of unhealthy body shape primes on these outcomes is largely unknown. Therefore, we here investigated how body primes, namely normal weight (NW), severely overweight (OW) and severely underweight (UW) body shapes, influenced attention and choice for low-calorie food (LcFd) and high-calorie food (HcFd). We hypothesized that OW and UW primes would activate opposing health goals (weight-loss vs. weight-gain respectively). Fifty normal weight sated females completed a primed food choice task in which choices between a LcFd and HcFd, matched for subjective liking, were presented after control or human body shapes (NW, UW or OW). In each trial participants had to identify the shape (i.e., non-human, human male or human female) and then choose the food they wanted to eat at that moment. Gaze was recorded by an eye tracker. Results showed that, although primes did not influence the choice, the total dwell time on chosen HcFd was higher when preceded by an OW prime compared with chosen LcFd and chosen HcFd preceded by an UW prime. Also, both total dwell time and the number of fixations were higher for chosen food compared with non-chosen food as well as for HcFd compared with LcFd without a corresponding higher proportion of HcFd choice. Overall, these data shed light on the interactions between attention, health body priming and food choice.

KW - Attention

KW - Body shapes

KW - Eye-tracking

KW - Food choice

KW - Food preference

KW - Gaze bias theory

KW - Health priming

UR - http://www.mendeley.com/research/health-body-priming-food-choice-eye-tracking-study

U2 - 10.1016/j.foodqual.2018.10.006

DO - 10.1016/j.foodqual.2018.10.006

M3 - Article

VL - 72

SP - 116

EP - 125

JO - Food Quality and Preference

JF - Food Quality and Preference

SN - 0950-3293

ER -