Health status and (health-related) quality of life during the recovery of distal radius fractures

A systematic review

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articleScientificpeer-review

Abstract

Purpose
Distal radius fractures (DRF) cause long-term functional limitations. A subgroup (21.2 %) will never fully recover after DRF. Therefore, it is important to consider the health status (HS) and (health-related) quality of life (HR)QOL of these patients. The aim of this systematic review was to describe (1) the HS and (HR)QOL outcomes following DRF, (2) sociodemographic, clinical, and psychosocial factors associated with HS and (HR)QOL, and to (3) evaluate the conceptualization of HS and (HR)QOL in these studies.
Methods
A systematic literature search was conducted in Pubmed, Embase, The Cochrane Library, and PsycINFO (January 1976–July 2012). A criteria list was used to assess the methodological quality of the studies.
Results
Twenty-six studies were included with a mean quality score of 7.7 (SD = 1.7). The majority of studies had a low methodological quality. Twenty-three studies (88.5 %) focused exclusively on HS and only three studies examined (HR)QOL. However, 34.8 % of the outcomes were labeled as (HR)QOL by the authors, while in fact, HS was assessed. Sex, age, educational level, living situation, and radiocarpal arthritis were associated with HS. In general, no differences were found in HS and (HR)QOL when comparing different treatment modalities.
Conclusions
The focus of outcome research in DRF is mainly on HS instead of (HR)QOL. HS instruments were often mislabeled as (HR)QOL instruments. With inconclusive results of mostly low-quality studies, there is a need for high-quality prospective follow-up studies measuring HS and/or (HR)QOL while using the correct terminology.
Keywords: Health status, Health-related quality of life, Quality of life, Distal radius fractures, Systematic review
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)2399-2416
JournalQuality of Life Research
Volume22
Issue number9
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2013

Fingerprint

PubMed
Terminology
Libraries

Cite this

@article{9707c2e9ba3748a6a2d6a366da5b7394,
title = "Health status and (health-related) quality of life during the recovery of distal radius fractures: A systematic review",
abstract = "PurposeDistal radius fractures (DRF) cause long-term functional limitations. A subgroup (21.2 {\%}) will never fully recover after DRF. Therefore, it is important to consider the health status (HS) and (health-related) quality of life (HR)QOL of these patients. The aim of this systematic review was to describe (1) the HS and (HR)QOL outcomes following DRF, (2) sociodemographic, clinical, and psychosocial factors associated with HS and (HR)QOL, and to (3) evaluate the conceptualization of HS and (HR)QOL in these studies.MethodsA systematic literature search was conducted in Pubmed, Embase, The Cochrane Library, and PsycINFO (January 1976–July 2012). A criteria list was used to assess the methodological quality of the studies.ResultsTwenty-six studies were included with a mean quality score of 7.7 (SD = 1.7). The majority of studies had a low methodological quality. Twenty-three studies (88.5 {\%}) focused exclusively on HS and only three studies examined (HR)QOL. However, 34.8 {\%} of the outcomes were labeled as (HR)QOL by the authors, while in fact, HS was assessed. Sex, age, educational level, living situation, and radiocarpal arthritis were associated with HS. In general, no differences were found in HS and (HR)QOL when comparing different treatment modalities.ConclusionsThe focus of outcome research in DRF is mainly on HS instead of (HR)QOL. HS instruments were often mislabeled as (HR)QOL instruments. With inconclusive results of mostly low-quality studies, there is a need for high-quality prospective follow-up studies measuring HS and/or (HR)QOL while using the correct terminology.Keywords: Health status, Health-related quality of life, Quality of life, Distal radius fractures, Systematic review",
author = "{van Son}, M.A.C. and {de Vries}, J. and J.A. Roukema and {den Oudsten}, B.L.",
year = "2013",
doi = "10.1007/s11136-013-0391-z",
language = "English",
volume = "22",
pages = "2399--2416",
journal = "Quality of Life Research",
issn = "0962-9343",
publisher = "Springer",
number = "9",

}

Health status and (health-related) quality of life during the recovery of distal radius fractures : A systematic review. / van Son, M.A.C.; de Vries, J.; Roukema, J.A.; den Oudsten, B.L.

In: Quality of Life Research, Vol. 22, No. 9, 2013, p. 2399-2416.

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articleScientificpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Health status and (health-related) quality of life during the recovery of distal radius fractures

T2 - A systematic review

AU - van Son, M.A.C.

AU - de Vries, J.

AU - Roukema, J.A.

AU - den Oudsten, B.L.

PY - 2013

Y1 - 2013

N2 - PurposeDistal radius fractures (DRF) cause long-term functional limitations. A subgroup (21.2 %) will never fully recover after DRF. Therefore, it is important to consider the health status (HS) and (health-related) quality of life (HR)QOL of these patients. The aim of this systematic review was to describe (1) the HS and (HR)QOL outcomes following DRF, (2) sociodemographic, clinical, and psychosocial factors associated with HS and (HR)QOL, and to (3) evaluate the conceptualization of HS and (HR)QOL in these studies.MethodsA systematic literature search was conducted in Pubmed, Embase, The Cochrane Library, and PsycINFO (January 1976–July 2012). A criteria list was used to assess the methodological quality of the studies.ResultsTwenty-six studies were included with a mean quality score of 7.7 (SD = 1.7). The majority of studies had a low methodological quality. Twenty-three studies (88.5 %) focused exclusively on HS and only three studies examined (HR)QOL. However, 34.8 % of the outcomes were labeled as (HR)QOL by the authors, while in fact, HS was assessed. Sex, age, educational level, living situation, and radiocarpal arthritis were associated with HS. In general, no differences were found in HS and (HR)QOL when comparing different treatment modalities.ConclusionsThe focus of outcome research in DRF is mainly on HS instead of (HR)QOL. HS instruments were often mislabeled as (HR)QOL instruments. With inconclusive results of mostly low-quality studies, there is a need for high-quality prospective follow-up studies measuring HS and/or (HR)QOL while using the correct terminology.Keywords: Health status, Health-related quality of life, Quality of life, Distal radius fractures, Systematic review

AB - PurposeDistal radius fractures (DRF) cause long-term functional limitations. A subgroup (21.2 %) will never fully recover after DRF. Therefore, it is important to consider the health status (HS) and (health-related) quality of life (HR)QOL of these patients. The aim of this systematic review was to describe (1) the HS and (HR)QOL outcomes following DRF, (2) sociodemographic, clinical, and psychosocial factors associated with HS and (HR)QOL, and to (3) evaluate the conceptualization of HS and (HR)QOL in these studies.MethodsA systematic literature search was conducted in Pubmed, Embase, The Cochrane Library, and PsycINFO (January 1976–July 2012). A criteria list was used to assess the methodological quality of the studies.ResultsTwenty-six studies were included with a mean quality score of 7.7 (SD = 1.7). The majority of studies had a low methodological quality. Twenty-three studies (88.5 %) focused exclusively on HS and only three studies examined (HR)QOL. However, 34.8 % of the outcomes were labeled as (HR)QOL by the authors, while in fact, HS was assessed. Sex, age, educational level, living situation, and radiocarpal arthritis were associated with HS. In general, no differences were found in HS and (HR)QOL when comparing different treatment modalities.ConclusionsThe focus of outcome research in DRF is mainly on HS instead of (HR)QOL. HS instruments were often mislabeled as (HR)QOL instruments. With inconclusive results of mostly low-quality studies, there is a need for high-quality prospective follow-up studies measuring HS and/or (HR)QOL while using the correct terminology.Keywords: Health status, Health-related quality of life, Quality of life, Distal radius fractures, Systematic review

U2 - 10.1007/s11136-013-0391-z

DO - 10.1007/s11136-013-0391-z

M3 - Review article

VL - 22

SP - 2399

EP - 2416

JO - Quality of Life Research

JF - Quality of Life Research

SN - 0962-9343

IS - 9

ER -