Heterogeneous Default Effects on Retirement Saving

Sledgehammers or Precision Instruments

Jochem de Bresser, M.G. Knoef

Research output: Working paperOther research output

54 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

This paper uses a randomized experiment in a representative sample from the Dutch population to investigate the effect of various defaults on retirement saving. In light of the Dutch pension system, with high contributions that afford generous income replace- ment but no flexibility other than the timing of retirement, we consider defaults that encourage less saving as well as more. The aggregate effects of defaults at deviations from the status quo are symmetric and large: they increase the fraction that either suspends or doubles premium payments for three years by 22 percentage points (pp) on a base of less than 10%. The status quo default is less powerful, raising the fraction by 6–13pp from a baseline around 60%. Rich survey data on demographics and prefer- ences matched with administrative records of wealth and forecasted pensions indicate that the different default effects are driven by different groups. A default of increased saving disproportionately affects those with self-control issues, but has a smaller effect on individuals prone to procrastination. Moreover, this is the only default that inter- acts with variables related to preparedness for retirement, with a larger effect on those with high housing wealth and high adequate expenditure goals. The saving reduction default affects women more strongly and has a weaker effect on university graduates.
Original languageEnglish
Publication statusUnpublished - 21 May 2019

Fingerprint

Retirement saving
Retirement
Status quo
Survey data
Deviation
Preparedness
Payment
Self-control
Randomized experiments
Procrastination
Wealth
Housing wealth
Pension system
Income
Demographics
Expenditure
Pensions
Replacement
Premium

Keywords

  • defaults
  • retirement saving
  • pensions
  • heterogenous effects

Cite this

@techreport{c889dcee39b2481799fc70d89014ce63,
title = "Heterogeneous Default Effects on Retirement Saving: Sledgehammers or Precision Instruments",
abstract = "This paper uses a randomized experiment in a representative sample from the Dutch population to investigate the effect of various defaults on retirement saving. In light of the Dutch pension system, with high contributions that afford generous income replace- ment but no flexibility other than the timing of retirement, we consider defaults that encourage less saving as well as more. The aggregate effects of defaults at deviations from the status quo are symmetric and large: they increase the fraction that either suspends or doubles premium payments for three years by 22 percentage points (pp) on a base of less than 10{\%}. The status quo default is less powerful, raising the fraction by 6–13pp from a baseline around 60{\%}. Rich survey data on demographics and prefer- ences matched with administrative records of wealth and forecasted pensions indicate that the different default effects are driven by different groups. A default of increased saving disproportionately affects those with self-control issues, but has a smaller effect on individuals prone to procrastination. Moreover, this is the only default that inter- acts with variables related to preparedness for retirement, with a larger effect on those with high housing wealth and high adequate expenditure goals. The saving reduction default affects women more strongly and has a weaker effect on university graduates.",
keywords = "defaults, retirement saving, pensions, heterogenous effects",
author = "{de Bresser}, Jochem and M.G. Knoef",
year = "2019",
month = "5",
day = "21",
language = "English",
type = "WorkingPaper",

}

Heterogeneous Default Effects on Retirement Saving : Sledgehammers or Precision Instruments. / de Bresser, Jochem; Knoef, M.G.

2019.

Research output: Working paperOther research output

TY - UNPB

T1 - Heterogeneous Default Effects on Retirement Saving

T2 - Sledgehammers or Precision Instruments

AU - de Bresser, Jochem

AU - Knoef, M.G.

PY - 2019/5/21

Y1 - 2019/5/21

N2 - This paper uses a randomized experiment in a representative sample from the Dutch population to investigate the effect of various defaults on retirement saving. In light of the Dutch pension system, with high contributions that afford generous income replace- ment but no flexibility other than the timing of retirement, we consider defaults that encourage less saving as well as more. The aggregate effects of defaults at deviations from the status quo are symmetric and large: they increase the fraction that either suspends or doubles premium payments for three years by 22 percentage points (pp) on a base of less than 10%. The status quo default is less powerful, raising the fraction by 6–13pp from a baseline around 60%. Rich survey data on demographics and prefer- ences matched with administrative records of wealth and forecasted pensions indicate that the different default effects are driven by different groups. A default of increased saving disproportionately affects those with self-control issues, but has a smaller effect on individuals prone to procrastination. Moreover, this is the only default that inter- acts with variables related to preparedness for retirement, with a larger effect on those with high housing wealth and high adequate expenditure goals. The saving reduction default affects women more strongly and has a weaker effect on university graduates.

AB - This paper uses a randomized experiment in a representative sample from the Dutch population to investigate the effect of various defaults on retirement saving. In light of the Dutch pension system, with high contributions that afford generous income replace- ment but no flexibility other than the timing of retirement, we consider defaults that encourage less saving as well as more. The aggregate effects of defaults at deviations from the status quo are symmetric and large: they increase the fraction that either suspends or doubles premium payments for three years by 22 percentage points (pp) on a base of less than 10%. The status quo default is less powerful, raising the fraction by 6–13pp from a baseline around 60%. Rich survey data on demographics and prefer- ences matched with administrative records of wealth and forecasted pensions indicate that the different default effects are driven by different groups. A default of increased saving disproportionately affects those with self-control issues, but has a smaller effect on individuals prone to procrastination. Moreover, this is the only default that inter- acts with variables related to preparedness for retirement, with a larger effect on those with high housing wealth and high adequate expenditure goals. The saving reduction default affects women more strongly and has a weaker effect on university graduates.

KW - defaults

KW - retirement saving

KW - pensions

KW - heterogenous effects

M3 - Working paper

BT - Heterogeneous Default Effects on Retirement Saving

ER -