High frequency body mass measurement, feedback, and health behaviors

P. Kooreman, A. Scherpenzeel

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

Abstract

We analyze weight and fat percentage measurements of respondents in an online general population panel in the Netherlands, collected using wireless scales, with an average frequency of 1.6 measurements per week. First, we document the existence of a weekly cycle; body mass is lowest on Fridays and highest on Mondays, showing significant (p < 0.01) differences of, on average, 0.2 kilogram in weight, 0.06 in BMI value, and 0.03 in fat percentage. Second, we find that in the general population fat-based measures of obesity point at a three times larger prevalence of obesity (53%) than BMI-based measures (17%). Third, we find that feedback that includes a recommended weight range increases the temporal variation in individual body mass by almost ten percent (sd for weight increases from 1.13 to 1.22; sd for BMI increases from 0.37 to 0.41; sd for fat percentage increases from 0.55 to 0.61.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)141-153
JournalEconomics & Human Biology
Volume14
Issue numberJuly
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jul 2014

Fingerprint

Health Behavior
health behavior
Fats
Weights and Measures
Netherlands
Values

Keywords

  • body mass
  • fat percentage
  • obesity
  • feedback
  • health behaviors
  • information technology

Cite this

Kooreman, P. ; Scherpenzeel, A. / High frequency body mass measurement, feedback, and health behaviors. In: Economics & Human Biology. 2014 ; Vol. 14, No. July. pp. 141-153.
@article{fd1dc6f7a99149de8758d1efdd89ad54,
title = "High frequency body mass measurement, feedback, and health behaviors",
abstract = "We analyze weight and fat percentage measurements of respondents in an online general population panel in the Netherlands, collected using wireless scales, with an average frequency of 1.6 measurements per week. First, we document the existence of a weekly cycle; body mass is lowest on Fridays and highest on Mondays, showing significant (p < 0.01) differences of, on average, 0.2 kilogram in weight, 0.06 in BMI value, and 0.03 in fat percentage. Second, we find that in the general population fat-based measures of obesity point at a three times larger prevalence of obesity (53{\%}) than BMI-based measures (17{\%}). Third, we find that feedback that includes a recommended weight range increases the temporal variation in individual body mass by almost ten percent (sd for weight increases from 1.13 to 1.22; sd for BMI increases from 0.37 to 0.41; sd for fat percentage increases from 0.55 to 0.61.",
keywords = "body mass, fat percentage, obesity, feedback, health behaviors, information technology",
author = "P. Kooreman and A. Scherpenzeel",
year = "2014",
month = "7",
doi = "10.1016/j.ehb.2013.12.003",
language = "English",
volume = "14",
pages = "141--153",
journal = "Economics & Human Biology",
issn = "1570-677X",
publisher = "Elsevier",
number = "July",

}

High frequency body mass measurement, feedback, and health behaviors. / Kooreman, P.; Scherpenzeel, A.

In: Economics & Human Biology, Vol. 14, No. July, 07.2014, p. 141-153.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - High frequency body mass measurement, feedback, and health behaviors

AU - Kooreman, P.

AU - Scherpenzeel, A.

PY - 2014/7

Y1 - 2014/7

N2 - We analyze weight and fat percentage measurements of respondents in an online general population panel in the Netherlands, collected using wireless scales, with an average frequency of 1.6 measurements per week. First, we document the existence of a weekly cycle; body mass is lowest on Fridays and highest on Mondays, showing significant (p < 0.01) differences of, on average, 0.2 kilogram in weight, 0.06 in BMI value, and 0.03 in fat percentage. Second, we find that in the general population fat-based measures of obesity point at a three times larger prevalence of obesity (53%) than BMI-based measures (17%). Third, we find that feedback that includes a recommended weight range increases the temporal variation in individual body mass by almost ten percent (sd for weight increases from 1.13 to 1.22; sd for BMI increases from 0.37 to 0.41; sd for fat percentage increases from 0.55 to 0.61.

AB - We analyze weight and fat percentage measurements of respondents in an online general population panel in the Netherlands, collected using wireless scales, with an average frequency of 1.6 measurements per week. First, we document the existence of a weekly cycle; body mass is lowest on Fridays and highest on Mondays, showing significant (p < 0.01) differences of, on average, 0.2 kilogram in weight, 0.06 in BMI value, and 0.03 in fat percentage. Second, we find that in the general population fat-based measures of obesity point at a three times larger prevalence of obesity (53%) than BMI-based measures (17%). Third, we find that feedback that includes a recommended weight range increases the temporal variation in individual body mass by almost ten percent (sd for weight increases from 1.13 to 1.22; sd for BMI increases from 0.37 to 0.41; sd for fat percentage increases from 0.55 to 0.61.

KW - body mass

KW - fat percentage

KW - obesity

KW - feedback

KW - health behaviors

KW - information technology

U2 - 10.1016/j.ehb.2013.12.003

DO - 10.1016/j.ehb.2013.12.003

M3 - Article

VL - 14

SP - 141

EP - 153

JO - Economics & Human Biology

JF - Economics & Human Biology

SN - 1570-677X

IS - July

ER -