Highly esteemed science: An analysis of attitudes towards and perceived attributes of science in letters to the editor in two Dutch newspapers

Stefan P.L. de Jong*, Elena Ketting, Leonie van Drooge

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

23 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Understanding attitudes towards science is crucial to safeguard the future of science, the application of its results and the inclusivity of decision-making processes related to science and technology. Most studies focus on attributes of social groups to explain attitudes towards science. In this study, we aim to move the discussion forward by focusing on perceived attributes of science itself by analysing over 300 letters to the editor in two Dutch national newspapers. The authors of these letters express a large degree of trust in science as a source of societal progress, if research is conducted according to a specific set of rules. Yet, they believe that these rules are under attack. The interests of universities as organizations and individual academics as well as the involvement of industry and government in research are perceived as conflicting with these rules. We conclude with recommendations for further research and practice.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)37-52
JournalPublic Understanding of Science
Volume29
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2020

Keywords

  • BELIEFS
  • DEFICIT MODEL
  • EDUCATION
  • GENDER-DIFFERENCES
  • GOVERNMENT
  • PERCEPTIONS
  • SCIENTIFIC-KNOWLEDGE
  • TRUST
  • academic autonomy
  • attitudes towards science
  • attributes of science
  • conflicts of interest
  • content analysis
  • letters to the editor
  • organization of science

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Highly esteemed science: An analysis of attitudes towards and perceived attributes of science in letters to the editor in two Dutch newspapers'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this